Early medical abortion provision via telehealth in Victoria: A qualitative descriptive study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Australian Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.31128/AJGP-04-23-6799
Susan Saldanha, Cassandra Caddy, Henrietta Williams, Jane S Hocking, Jacqueline Coombe
{"title":"Early medical abortion provision via telehealth in Victoria: A qualitative descriptive study.","authors":"Susan Saldanha, Cassandra Caddy, Henrietta Williams, Jane S Hocking, Jacqueline Coombe","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-04-23-6799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Little is known about the views of service providers currently working in telehealth early medical abortion (EMA) provision in Victoria, Australia. This study aims to contextualise the enablers and barriers to telehealth EMA provision, providing insight for healthcare policy and practice to improve the accessibility of this service.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a qualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews with 14 Victorian stakeholders with expertise and knowledge on telehealth EMA provision. Data were analysed using conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study presents perceived enablers and barriers across four different contexts of the Victorian abortion system: (1) perceived patient context; (2) perceived provider context; (3) health organisation-system context; and (4) sociopolitical context. The COVID-19 pandemic's disruption of healthcare services led to greater patient and provider acceptance of telehealth EMA. However, barriers within the patient context included the inability to ensure safety and confidentiality, digital access and literacy issues, language barriers, and the importance of trusting provider-patient relationships. Providers encountered challenges in delivering holistic care via telehealth, including time and workload issues and working with interpreters. Shortcomings within the organisational context encompassed structural barriers for culturally and linguistically diverse population groups, the absence of standard telehealth guidelines and varying interpretations of telehealth. Although temporary Medicare item number changes improved access, they presented financial challenges for mixed and private billing practices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The application of these findings by relevant health services and policymakers has the potential to improve the quality of, and increase accessibility to, telehealth EMA, better meeting the needs of individuals seeking this service.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"53 11","pages":"794-798"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-04-23-6799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Little is known about the views of service providers currently working in telehealth early medical abortion (EMA) provision in Victoria, Australia. This study aims to contextualise the enablers and barriers to telehealth EMA provision, providing insight for healthcare policy and practice to improve the accessibility of this service.

Method: This was a qualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews with 14 Victorian stakeholders with expertise and knowledge on telehealth EMA provision. Data were analysed using conventional content analysis.

Results: This study presents perceived enablers and barriers across four different contexts of the Victorian abortion system: (1) perceived patient context; (2) perceived provider context; (3) health organisation-system context; and (4) sociopolitical context. The COVID-19 pandemic's disruption of healthcare services led to greater patient and provider acceptance of telehealth EMA. However, barriers within the patient context included the inability to ensure safety and confidentiality, digital access and literacy issues, language barriers, and the importance of trusting provider-patient relationships. Providers encountered challenges in delivering holistic care via telehealth, including time and workload issues and working with interpreters. Shortcomings within the organisational context encompassed structural barriers for culturally and linguistically diverse population groups, the absence of standard telehealth guidelines and varying interpretations of telehealth. Although temporary Medicare item number changes improved access, they presented financial challenges for mixed and private billing practices.

Discussion: The application of these findings by relevant health services and policymakers has the potential to improve the quality of, and increase accessibility to, telehealth EMA, better meeting the needs of individuals seeking this service.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维多利亚州通过远程医疗提供早期药物流产:一项定性描述性研究。
背景和目的:目前,澳大利亚维多利亚州远程医疗早期医学流产(EMA)服务提供者的观点鲜为人知。本研究旨在了解提供远程医疗早期医学流产(EMA)的有利因素和障碍,为医疗保健政策和实践提供洞察力,以改善这项服务的可及性:这是一项定性描述性研究,对维多利亚州 14 名具有远程医疗急救医疗服务专业知识的利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈。采用传统的内容分析法对数据进行分析:本研究介绍了维多利亚州人工流产系统四种不同背景下可感知的促进因素和障碍:(1) 可感知的患者背景;(2) 可感知的提供者背景;(3) 卫生组织-系统背景;以及 (4) 社会政治背景。COVID-19 大流行对医疗保健服务的破坏导致患者和医疗服务提供者对远程医疗 EMA 的接受度提高。然而,患者方面的障碍包括无法确保安全和保密性、数字访问和扫盲问题、语言障碍以及提供者与患者之间信任关系的重要性。医疗服务提供者在通过远程医疗提供整体护理时遇到了挑战,包括时间和工作量问题,以及与口译员合作的问题。组织环境中的不足包括文化和语言多样化人群的结构性障碍、缺乏标准的远程医疗指南以及对远程医疗的不同解释。虽然临时性的医疗保险项目编号变更改善了远程医疗的可及性,但也给混合和私人计费业务带来了财务挑战:讨论:相关医疗服务机构和政策制定者应用这些研究结果,有可能提高远程医疗 EMA 的质量并增加其可及性,从而更好地满足寻求这种服务的个人的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
期刊最新文献
An acute, progressive, asymmetrical pruritic eruption. Breast density in screening mammography. Clindamycin and bacterial load reduction as prophylaxis for surgical site infection after below-knee flap and graft procedures: A trial protocol. Clinical care for women seeking pregnancy after miscarriage. Conjunctivitis: A review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1