{"title":"Animal behaviour and dietary preference of dairy cows grazing binary and diverse pastures under the leaf regrowth stage defoliation criterion","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In New Zealand, intensively managed pasture-based dairy systems rely on binary pastures mostly comprised of <em>Lolium perenne</em> L. and <em>Trifolium repens</em> L.. More frequent and extreme climatic events have been negatively affecting the persistency and production of these pastures, which now present increased seasonality, with marked peaks and troughs of production throughout the year. Diversification of plant species offers a solution to deal with increased seasonality. However, little is known about animal behaviour and dietary preferences of dairy cows grazing diverse pastures. The present study aimed to assess the grazing preferences of dairy cows when unrestrictedly offered binary (<em>L. perenne and T. repens</em>; Bi) and diverse pastures (<em>L. perenne, Bromus valdivianus</em> Phil.<em>, Dactylis glomerata</em> L. and <em>T. repens</em>; Mix) subjected to three different leaf regrowth stage (LS) defoliation criteria. Secondarily, the study aimed to determine the main plant-related drivers for any potential animal preference. The treatments were MixLp (defoliated at <em>L. perenne</em> LS), BiLp (defoliated every time MixLp was defoliated), MixBv (defoliated at <em>B. valdivianus</em> LS) and BiBv (defoliated every time MixBv was defoliated), MixDg (defoliated at <em>D. glomerata</em> LS) and BiDg (defoliated every time MixDg was defoliated). Dairy cattle were evaluated over five agricultural seasons. The response variables were grazing time and location, bite rate, animal behavioural activity, pre-grazing herbage mass, undisturbed sward height, lamina:stem ratio, crude protein, metabolisable energy, organic matter digestibility, non-structural carbohydrates, neutral detergent fibre and lignin. Where significant differences were found, binary pastures presented lower sward height and higher non-structural carbohydrate content in comparison to the diverse pastures under the same LS defoliation criteria. However, no significant differences were found in the percentage of time that cows spent grazing both pastures. Season was the greatest contributor to the proportion variation found in all response variables, with values ranging from 47.55 % up to 88.77 %. In winter and spring, cows modulated their grazing behaviour (proportional time spent grazing, ruminating, or idling), investing more time actively grazing pastures under <em>L. perenne</em> LS interval of defoliation (2.5–3.0 LS), the criterion which resulted in shorter grazing rotations. This study allowed us to understand the suitability of diverse pastures from an animal perspective, and highlighted that independent of the pasture type, the positive productive and nutritional effects of defoliation management based on the LS may also extend themselves to positive outcomes in animal preference, interpreted as the percentage of time dairy cows spend grazing rather than ruminating or idling across and within seasons.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124002748","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In New Zealand, intensively managed pasture-based dairy systems rely on binary pastures mostly comprised of Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L.. More frequent and extreme climatic events have been negatively affecting the persistency and production of these pastures, which now present increased seasonality, with marked peaks and troughs of production throughout the year. Diversification of plant species offers a solution to deal with increased seasonality. However, little is known about animal behaviour and dietary preferences of dairy cows grazing diverse pastures. The present study aimed to assess the grazing preferences of dairy cows when unrestrictedly offered binary (L. perenne and T. repens; Bi) and diverse pastures (L. perenne, Bromus valdivianus Phil., Dactylis glomerata L. and T. repens; Mix) subjected to three different leaf regrowth stage (LS) defoliation criteria. Secondarily, the study aimed to determine the main plant-related drivers for any potential animal preference. The treatments were MixLp (defoliated at L. perenne LS), BiLp (defoliated every time MixLp was defoliated), MixBv (defoliated at B. valdivianus LS) and BiBv (defoliated every time MixBv was defoliated), MixDg (defoliated at D. glomerata LS) and BiDg (defoliated every time MixDg was defoliated). Dairy cattle were evaluated over five agricultural seasons. The response variables were grazing time and location, bite rate, animal behavioural activity, pre-grazing herbage mass, undisturbed sward height, lamina:stem ratio, crude protein, metabolisable energy, organic matter digestibility, non-structural carbohydrates, neutral detergent fibre and lignin. Where significant differences were found, binary pastures presented lower sward height and higher non-structural carbohydrate content in comparison to the diverse pastures under the same LS defoliation criteria. However, no significant differences were found in the percentage of time that cows spent grazing both pastures. Season was the greatest contributor to the proportion variation found in all response variables, with values ranging from 47.55 % up to 88.77 %. In winter and spring, cows modulated their grazing behaviour (proportional time spent grazing, ruminating, or idling), investing more time actively grazing pastures under L. perenne LS interval of defoliation (2.5–3.0 LS), the criterion which resulted in shorter grazing rotations. This study allowed us to understand the suitability of diverse pastures from an animal perspective, and highlighted that independent of the pasture type, the positive productive and nutritional effects of defoliation management based on the LS may also extend themselves to positive outcomes in animal preference, interpreted as the percentage of time dairy cows spend grazing rather than ruminating or idling across and within seasons.
在新西兰,以牧场为基础的集约化管理奶牛饲养系统依赖于二元牧场,主要由Lolium perenne L.和Trifolium repens L.组成。更加频繁和极端的气候事件对这些牧场的持久性和产量产生了负面影响,现在这些牧场的季节性越来越强,全年的产量有明显的高峰和低谷。植物物种的多样化为解决季节性增加的问题提供了一个解决方案。然而,人们对奶牛放牧多样化牧草的动物行为和饮食偏好知之甚少。本研究旨在评估奶牛在二元牧草(L. perenne 和 T. repens;Bi)和多元牧草(L. perenne、Bromus valdivianus Phil.、Dactylis glomerata L.和 T. repens;Mix)条件下的放牧偏好。其次,该研究旨在确定任何潜在动物偏好的主要植物相关驱动因素。处理为 MixLp(在 L. perenne LS 上落叶)、BiLp(每次 MixLp 落叶时都落叶)、MixBv(在 B. valdivianus LS 上落叶)和 BiBv(每次 MixBv 落叶时都落叶)、MixDg(在 D. glomerata LS 上落叶)和 BiDg(每次 MixDg 落叶时都落叶)。在五个农季中对奶牛进行了评估。反应变量包括放牧时间和地点、咬食率、动物行为活动、放牧前草料质量、未受干扰草丛高度、茎片比、粗蛋白、代谢能、有机物消化率、非结构性碳水化合物、中性洗涤纤维和木质素。在发现明显差异的地方,二元牧草的草丛高度较低,非结构性碳水化合物含量较高,而在相同的LS落叶标准下,多元牧草的草丛高度较低,非结构性碳水化合物含量较高。然而,奶牛在两种牧草上花费的时间比例并无明显差异。在所有响应变量中,季节是造成比例变化的最大因素,其数值从47.55%到88.77%不等。在冬季和春季,奶牛会调节其放牧行为(放牧、反刍或闲逛的时间比例),在L. perenne LS落叶间隔期(2.5-3.0 LS)内投入更多时间积极放牧草场,这一标准导致轮牧期缩短。这项研究让我们从动物的角度了解了不同牧草的适宜性,并强调了基于LS的落叶管理在牧草类型之外对生产和营养的积极影响也可能延伸到动物偏好方面的积极结果,即奶牛在不同季节和不同季节内用于放牧而非反刍或闲置的时间百分比。
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.