Ziwei Jin , Juntian Niu , Haiyu Liu , Yan Jin , Jiancheng Wang , Changfu You , Jingyu Ran
{"title":"Study on the mechanism of methane activation on Co-based catalysts with variable valence","authors":"Ziwei Jin , Juntian Niu , Haiyu Liu , Yan Jin , Jiancheng Wang , Changfu You , Jingyu Ran","doi":"10.1016/j.cplett.2024.141728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Methane is an important hydrocarbon gas that plays a key role in energy production and utilization. In this study, the mechanism of methane activation on Co (1<!--> <!-->0<!--> <!-->0), CoO (1<!--> <!-->0<!--> <!-->0), and Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> (1<!--> <!-->1<!--> <!-->0) surfaces is thoroughly analyzed using density functional theory, revealing the performance differences in methane activation due to different valence states of cobalt. On the Co (1<!--> <!-->0<!--> <!-->0) surface, methane dehydrogenation mainly proceeds through direct dehydrogenation and O-assisted dehydrogenation, with the O-assisted dehydrogenation having a higher energy barrier. The energy barrier on the CoO (1<!--> <!-->0<!--> <!-->0) surface is significantly higher than that on the Co (1<!--> <!-->0<!--> <!-->0) surface, thus it is not favorable for methane activation. In contrast, the energy barrier for methane dissociation and dehydrogenation on Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> (1<!--> <!-->1<!--> <!-->0) is the lowest, with Co<sup>3+</sup> exhibiting the best catalytic performance. Additionally, the activation effect of Co<sup>2+</sup> sites on methane is similar to that on the CoO (1<!--> <!-->0<!--> <!-->0) surface, and is less effective than Co<sup>0</sup> and Co<sup>3+</sup>, indicating that the Co<sup>2+</sup> and Co<sup>3+</sup> on the Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> (1<!--> <!-->1<!--> <!-->0) surface do not show a significant synergistic effect in catalytic reactions. These research findings help to reveal the mechanistic role of different cobalt valence states in methane activation at the atomic level, providing important guidance for the design of efficient methane catalytic conversion catalysts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":273,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Physics Letters","volume":"857 ","pages":"Article 141728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Physics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009261424006705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Methane is an important hydrocarbon gas that plays a key role in energy production and utilization. In this study, the mechanism of methane activation on Co (1 0 0), CoO (1 0 0), and Co3O4 (1 1 0) surfaces is thoroughly analyzed using density functional theory, revealing the performance differences in methane activation due to different valence states of cobalt. On the Co (1 0 0) surface, methane dehydrogenation mainly proceeds through direct dehydrogenation and O-assisted dehydrogenation, with the O-assisted dehydrogenation having a higher energy barrier. The energy barrier on the CoO (1 0 0) surface is significantly higher than that on the Co (1 0 0) surface, thus it is not favorable for methane activation. In contrast, the energy barrier for methane dissociation and dehydrogenation on Co3O4 (1 1 0) is the lowest, with Co3+ exhibiting the best catalytic performance. Additionally, the activation effect of Co2+ sites on methane is similar to that on the CoO (1 0 0) surface, and is less effective than Co0 and Co3+, indicating that the Co2+ and Co3+ on the Co3O4 (1 1 0) surface do not show a significant synergistic effect in catalytic reactions. These research findings help to reveal the mechanistic role of different cobalt valence states in methane activation at the atomic level, providing important guidance for the design of efficient methane catalytic conversion catalysts.
期刊介绍:
Chemical Physics Letters has an open access mirror journal, Chemical Physics Letters: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
Chemical Physics Letters publishes brief reports on molecules, interfaces, condensed phases, nanomaterials and nanostructures, polymers, biomolecular systems, and energy conversion and storage.
Criteria for publication are quality, urgency and impact. Further, experimental results reported in the journal have direct relevance for theory, and theoretical developments or non-routine computations relate directly to experiment. Manuscripts must satisfy these criteria and should not be minor extensions of previous work.