Conrad Wasko , Clare Stephens , Tim J. Peterson , Rory Nathan , Acacia Pepler , Suresh Hettiarachchi , Elisabeth Vogel , Fiona Johnson , Seth Westra
{"title":"Understanding the implications of climate change for Australia’s surface water resources: Challenges and future directions","authors":"Conrad Wasko , Clare Stephens , Tim J. Peterson , Rory Nathan , Acacia Pepler , Suresh Hettiarachchi , Elisabeth Vogel , Fiona Johnson , Seth Westra","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change is altering Australia’s streamflow and water resources due to a complex interplay of shifts in temperature, rainfall, evaporation, vegetation dynamics, soil moisture, and rainfall-runoff partitioning. Meanwhile increases in human activity and urbanisation continue to alter the landscape, further affecting streamflow and flood volumes. Understanding the nature of these recent changes is critical for evaluating future risks and ensuring planning decisions are sustainable. Positively, our knowledge of changes to Australia’s hydrologic regimes has greatly advanced in the last decade. Here we review our current understanding of historical hydrologic changes, focusing first on the drivers of change and then observed changes in streamflow and flooding, before turning our attention to the role that historical observations can play in anticipating future climate change impacts. We conclude with recommendations to help better understand and plan for an unknown future.</div><div>Increases in extreme rainfalls have increased the risk of large flood events. However, declines in mean rainfall across large parts of the continent, increases in diversions, and increasing evaporate demand have led to an overall drying. Significant advances in our understanding have been made through analysing trends in the observational record and investigating the associated drivers. While these learnings may not reliably inform the potential effects of future change, they can still inform process understanding ultimately helping accurately model and project future impacts. Projecting climate change impacts on water resources in Australia remains challenging, and progress will require improved instrumentation to observe and understand catchment responses together with methods and management techniques that incorporate this additional uncertainty. We argue it is through process-informed models together with multi-scale observational data that this gap can be breached.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"645 ","pages":"Article 132221"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424016172","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Climate change is altering Australia’s streamflow and water resources due to a complex interplay of shifts in temperature, rainfall, evaporation, vegetation dynamics, soil moisture, and rainfall-runoff partitioning. Meanwhile increases in human activity and urbanisation continue to alter the landscape, further affecting streamflow and flood volumes. Understanding the nature of these recent changes is critical for evaluating future risks and ensuring planning decisions are sustainable. Positively, our knowledge of changes to Australia’s hydrologic regimes has greatly advanced in the last decade. Here we review our current understanding of historical hydrologic changes, focusing first on the drivers of change and then observed changes in streamflow and flooding, before turning our attention to the role that historical observations can play in anticipating future climate change impacts. We conclude with recommendations to help better understand and plan for an unknown future.
Increases in extreme rainfalls have increased the risk of large flood events. However, declines in mean rainfall across large parts of the continent, increases in diversions, and increasing evaporate demand have led to an overall drying. Significant advances in our understanding have been made through analysing trends in the observational record and investigating the associated drivers. While these learnings may not reliably inform the potential effects of future change, they can still inform process understanding ultimately helping accurately model and project future impacts. Projecting climate change impacts on water resources in Australia remains challenging, and progress will require improved instrumentation to observe and understand catchment responses together with methods and management techniques that incorporate this additional uncertainty. We argue it is through process-informed models together with multi-scale observational data that this gap can be breached.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.