Spillover of fear among the US and BRICS equity markets during the COVID-19 crisis and the Russo-Ukrainian conflict

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE North American Journal of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.najef.2024.102308
Yi Zhang , Long Zhou , Zhidong Liu , Baoxiu Wu
{"title":"Spillover of fear among the US and BRICS equity markets during the COVID-19 crisis and the Russo-Ukrainian conflict","authors":"Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Long Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhidong Liu ,&nbsp;Baoxiu Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2024.102308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines volatility contagion between the US and five BRICS stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russo-Ukrainian crisis. We first use the Markov-switching dynamic regression method to endogenously identify various phases of market evolution. Then, we employ a dynamic conditional correlation process to uncover time-varying volatility spillovers relying on the implied volatility induced by daily changes in the investigated markets. Empirical results indicate that market spillover during the two crises presents quite different scenarios. The US has a more significant and persistent contagion effect on the BRICS markets during COVID-19. However, only a short-lived and pulse-like market response is detected in the initial stage of the Russo-Ukrainian crisis, and the volatility interdependency structures do not follow a specific pattern across all implied volatility pairs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102308"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S106294082400233X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines volatility contagion between the US and five BRICS stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russo-Ukrainian crisis. We first use the Markov-switching dynamic regression method to endogenously identify various phases of market evolution. Then, we employ a dynamic conditional correlation process to uncover time-varying volatility spillovers relying on the implied volatility induced by daily changes in the investigated markets. Empirical results indicate that market spillover during the two crises presents quite different scenarios. The US has a more significant and persistent contagion effect on the BRICS markets during COVID-19. However, only a short-lived and pulse-like market response is detected in the initial stage of the Russo-Ukrainian crisis, and the volatility interdependency structures do not follow a specific pattern across all implied volatility pairs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 危机和俄乌冲突期间,美国和金砖国家股票市场的恐慌蔓延
本研究探讨了 COVID-19 大流行和俄乌危机期间美国和五个金砖国家股票市场之间的波动传染。我们首先使用马尔科夫切换动态回归法来内生识别市场演变的各个阶段。然后,我们采用动态条件相关过程,根据被调查市场每日变化所引起的隐含波动率来揭示时变波动溢出效应。实证结果表明,两次危机期间的市场溢出效应呈现出截然不同的情形。在 COVID-19 危机期间,美国对金砖国家市场的蔓延效应更为显著和持久。然而,在俄乌危机的初始阶段,只检测到了短暂的脉冲式市场反应,而且在所有隐含波动率对中,波动率相互依存结构并不遵循特定模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.
期刊最新文献
ESG rating and default risk: Evidence from China Decoding the stock market dynamics in the banking sector: Short versus long-term insights Static and dynamic return and volatility connectedness between transportation tokens and transportation indices: Evidence from quantile connectedness approach The role of digital transformation in mergers and acquisitions Spillover of fear among the US and BRICS equity markets during the COVID-19 crisis and the Russo-Ukrainian conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1