When the accuser meets the accused: Exploring the role of nonprofit legitimacy and CSR reputation in corporate social irresponsibility

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115047
Ziyuan Zhou , Xueying Zhang , Eyun-Jung Ki
{"title":"When the accuser meets the accused: Exploring the role of nonprofit legitimacy and CSR reputation in corporate social irresponsibility","authors":"Ziyuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Xueying Zhang ,&nbsp;Eyun-Jung Ki","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nonprofits like environmental groups and consumer activist organizations play an important role in exposing corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) practices. However, very few studies have paid attention to this specific stakeholder group in the CSI context. Applying the concept of infomediaries, this study explores the effect of nonprofit legitimacy on consumers’ blame toward the accused company and when the company’s CSR reputation can defend such an accusation. Using two experiments, this study found that an accusing nonprofit’s entity legitimacy and action legitimacy drive consumers’ blame attribution to the accused company. In addition, a strong CSR reputation helped defend the company against accusations from a highly legitimate nonprofit, but this effect was not observed when the nonprofit took highly legitimate action. The conclusions advise practitioners to meticulously examine the characteristics of the nonprofit involved in a nonprofit-led CSI incident.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 115047"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324005514","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonprofits like environmental groups and consumer activist organizations play an important role in exposing corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) practices. However, very few studies have paid attention to this specific stakeholder group in the CSI context. Applying the concept of infomediaries, this study explores the effect of nonprofit legitimacy on consumers’ blame toward the accused company and when the company’s CSR reputation can defend such an accusation. Using two experiments, this study found that an accusing nonprofit’s entity legitimacy and action legitimacy drive consumers’ blame attribution to the accused company. In addition, a strong CSR reputation helped defend the company against accusations from a highly legitimate nonprofit, but this effect was not observed when the nonprofit took highly legitimate action. The conclusions advise practitioners to meticulously examine the characteristics of the nonprofit involved in a nonprofit-led CSI incident.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当原告遇到被告:探索非营利组织合法性和企业社会责任声誉在企业社会责任中的作用
非营利组织,如环保组织和消费者活动组织,在揭露企业不负社会责任(CSI)行为方面发挥着重要作用。然而,很少有研究关注 CSI 背景下的这一特定利益相关群体。本研究运用信息中介的概念,探讨了非营利组织的合法性对消费者指责被指控公司的影响,以及当公司的企业社会责任声誉可以为这种指责辩护时,非营利组织的合法性对消费者指责被指控公司的影响。通过两个实验,本研究发现,指控非营利组织的实体合法性和行动合法性会促使消费者对被指控公司进行指责。此外,强大的企业社会责任声誉有助于公司抵御来自高度合法的非营利组织的指控,但当该非营利组织采取高度合法的行动时,这种效果就不明显了。结论建议从业者仔细研究非营利组织主导的 CSI 事件中涉及的非营利组织的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
All the cues we cannot see: How reward-driven distractors render consumers insensitive to assortment complexity Economic or Political Outcomes: Corporate Political Activity in a Populist Setting Coping with uncertainty: The interaction of psychological safety and authentic leadership in their effects on defensive decision making Growth hacking: Leveraging hyper-scalability, hyper-specialization, and human-centric strategies for competitive advantage Going against the Tide: How Self-Construal Moderates Receptivity towards Popular Brand Activism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1