Udaya S Tantry, Richard C Becker, Sahib Singh, Lekshminarayan Raghavakurup, Eliano Navarese, Kevin P Bliden, Paul A Gurbel
{"title":"Reassessing the role of aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease.","authors":"Udaya S Tantry, Richard C Becker, Sahib Singh, Lekshminarayan Raghavakurup, Eliano Navarese, Kevin P Bliden, Paul A Gurbel","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2427338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent data question the use of aspirin as a bedrock of antiplatelet therapy in patients with arterial diseases. There are controversies regarding the efficacy of aspirin therapy with respect to specific demographic characteristics, dose and formulations, benefit in primary prevention, and duration in secondary prevention. Importantly, to balance the ischemic benefits and the risk of excessive bleeding following a coronary event, recent studies have investigated strategies to discontinue aspirin therapy and continue with P2Y<sub>12</sub> receptor inhibitor monotherapy. However, the precise time when to discontinue aspirin is still unresolved.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Evidence from recent studies evaluating the role of aspirin in primary and secondary prevention studies was collected from a selective literature search. In this review, the authors discuss current recommendations, large-scale studies of aspirin therapy, controversies, and potential future opportunities for aspirin therapy.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>With the new evidence showing lower bleeding risk with aspirin-free strategies in both primary and secondary prevention studies, the role of aspirin is being revaluated with P2Y<sub>12</sub> receptor inhibitor monotherapy. The potential benefits of novel aspirin formulations and alternative delivery methods, such as inhaled aspirin, are undergoing much-needed investigation with the goal of optimizing care for a wide range of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2307-2317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2427338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Recent data question the use of aspirin as a bedrock of antiplatelet therapy in patients with arterial diseases. There are controversies regarding the efficacy of aspirin therapy with respect to specific demographic characteristics, dose and formulations, benefit in primary prevention, and duration in secondary prevention. Importantly, to balance the ischemic benefits and the risk of excessive bleeding following a coronary event, recent studies have investigated strategies to discontinue aspirin therapy and continue with P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy. However, the precise time when to discontinue aspirin is still unresolved.
Areas covered: Evidence from recent studies evaluating the role of aspirin in primary and secondary prevention studies was collected from a selective literature search. In this review, the authors discuss current recommendations, large-scale studies of aspirin therapy, controversies, and potential future opportunities for aspirin therapy.
Expert opinion: With the new evidence showing lower bleeding risk with aspirin-free strategies in both primary and secondary prevention studies, the role of aspirin is being revaluated with P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy. The potential benefits of novel aspirin formulations and alternative delivery methods, such as inhaled aspirin, are undergoing much-needed investigation with the goal of optimizing care for a wide range of patients.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.