SGLT-2 inhibitors and mortality among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: linked database study.

IF 105.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine BMJ : British Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-080925
Henrik Svanström, George Frederick Mkoma, Anders Hviid, Björn Pasternak
{"title":"SGLT-2 inhibitors and mortality among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: linked database study.","authors":"Henrik Svanström, George Frederick Mkoma, Anders Hviid, Björn Pasternak","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-080925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor use and risk of all cause mortality among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Linked database study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National registers in Denmark, July 2020 to June 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with heart failure, aged ≥45 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was all cause mortality comparing initiation and continued treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus continued treatment with other standard-of-care heart failure drugs and non-use of SGLT-2 inhibitors; secondary outcomes were the composite of cardiovascular mortality or admission to hospital with heart failure and its individual components. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 6776 patients who started SGLT-2 inhibitors (79% dapagliflozin; 21% empagliflozin) and 14 686 patients who remained on other standard-of-care heart failure drugs and did not use SGLT-2 inhibitors. Most SGLT-2 inhibitor users were male (70%), the mean age was 71.2 (standard deviation 10.6) years, and 20% had type 2 diabetes. During follow-up, 374 deaths occurred among SGLT-2 inhibitor users (incidence rate 5.8 per 100 person years) and 1602 among non-users (8.5 per 100 person years). The weighted hazard ratio for all cause mortality was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.85); the weighted incidence rate difference was -1.6 (95% confidence interval -2.5 to -0.8) per 100 person years. Secondary outcomes showed a weighted hazard ratio of 0.94 (0.85 to 1.04) for cardiovascular mortality or hospital admission with heart failure, 0.77 (0.64 to 0.92) for cardiovascular mortality, and 1.03 (0.92 to 1.15) for hospital admission with heart failure. The weighted hazard ratios for all cause mortality were consistent in patients with and without diabetes (0.73 (0.58 to 0.91) and 0.73 (0.63 to 0.85); P=0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large database study among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, SGLT-2 inhibitor use was associated with a 25% lower risk of all cause mortality, supporting their effectiveness in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9201,"journal":{"name":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":105.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-080925","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor use and risk of all cause mortality among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Design: Linked database study.

Setting: National registers in Denmark, July 2020 to June 2023.

Participants: Patients with heart failure, aged ≥45 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was all cause mortality comparing initiation and continued treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus continued treatment with other standard-of-care heart failure drugs and non-use of SGLT-2 inhibitors; secondary outcomes were the composite of cardiovascular mortality or admission to hospital with heart failure and its individual components. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores.

Results: The study included 6776 patients who started SGLT-2 inhibitors (79% dapagliflozin; 21% empagliflozin) and 14 686 patients who remained on other standard-of-care heart failure drugs and did not use SGLT-2 inhibitors. Most SGLT-2 inhibitor users were male (70%), the mean age was 71.2 (standard deviation 10.6) years, and 20% had type 2 diabetes. During follow-up, 374 deaths occurred among SGLT-2 inhibitor users (incidence rate 5.8 per 100 person years) and 1602 among non-users (8.5 per 100 person years). The weighted hazard ratio for all cause mortality was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.85); the weighted incidence rate difference was -1.6 (95% confidence interval -2.5 to -0.8) per 100 person years. Secondary outcomes showed a weighted hazard ratio of 0.94 (0.85 to 1.04) for cardiovascular mortality or hospital admission with heart failure, 0.77 (0.64 to 0.92) for cardiovascular mortality, and 1.03 (0.92 to 1.15) for hospital admission with heart failure. The weighted hazard ratios for all cause mortality were consistent in patients with and without diabetes (0.73 (0.58 to 0.91) and 0.73 (0.63 to 0.85); P=0.99).

Conclusions: In this large database study among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, SGLT-2 inhibitor use was associated with a 25% lower risk of all cause mortality, supporting their effectiveness in routine clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SGLT-2 抑制剂与射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者的死亡率:关联数据库研究。
目的调查钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2(SGLT-2)抑制剂的使用与射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者全因死亡风险之间的关系:关联数据库研究:2020年7月至2023年6月期间的丹麦全国登记:年龄≥45岁、左心室射血分数≤40%的心衰患者:主要结果为所有病因死亡率,将开始和继续使用SGLT-2抑制剂治疗与继续使用其他心衰标准药物治疗和不使用SGLT-2抑制剂进行比较;次要结果为心血管死亡率或因心衰入院的综合死亡率及其各个组成部分。使用基于倾向评分的逆概率治疗加权法调整后的 Cox 回归估算危险比:研究纳入了6776名开始使用SGLT-2抑制剂(79%为达帕利洛嗪;21%为恩格列净)的患者,以及14,686名仍在使用其他标准治疗心衰药物且未使用SGLT-2抑制剂的患者。大多数 SGLT-2 抑制剂使用者为男性(70%),平均年龄为 71.2 岁(标准差 10.6),20% 患有 2 型糖尿病。在随访期间,SGLT-2抑制剂使用者中有374人死亡(发病率为每百人年5.8例),非使用者中有1602人死亡(每百人年8.5例)。全因死亡率的加权危险比为 0.75(95% 置信区间为 0.66 至 0.85);加权发病率差异为每百人年-1.6(95% 置信区间为-2.5 至-0.8)。次要结果显示,心血管死亡或心力衰竭入院的加权危险比为0.94(0.85至1.04),心血管死亡为0.77(0.64至0.92),心力衰竭入院为1.03(0.92至1.15)。糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的全因死亡率加权危险比一致(分别为0.73(0.58至0.91)和0.73(0.63至0.85);P=0.99):在这项针对射血分数降低型心力衰竭患者的大型数据库研究中,使用SGLT-2抑制剂可将全因死亡风险降低25%,支持其在常规临床实践中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ : British Medical Journal
BMJ : British Medical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
2997
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The BMJ (British Medical Journal) is an international peer-reviewed medical journal with a "continuous publication" model, where articles are published on bmj.com before appearing in the print journal. The website is updated daily with the latest original research, education, news, and comment articles, along with podcasts, videos, and blogs. The BMJ's editorial team is primarily located in London, with additional editors in Europe, the US, and India.
期刊最新文献
UN biodiversity summit on reversing nature loss "veers dangerously off track". BMA defends consultants in row about overtime pay after BBC report. Childhood obesity in England's most deprived areas is double that in affluent areas. Safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for heart failure. SGLT-2 inhibitors and mortality among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: linked database study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1