Validation of the revised 2022 European LeukemiaNet risk stratification in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood advances Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013304
Leo Ruhnke, Marius Bill, Sven Zukunft, Jan-Niklas Eckardt, Silvia Schäfer, Sebastian Stasik, Maher Hanoun, Thomas Schroeder, Lars Fransecky, Björn Steffen, Stefan W Krause, Sebastian Scholl, Andreas Hochhaus, Tim Sauer, Sabrina Kraus, Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart, Martin Kaufmann, Edgar Jost, Tim Brümmendorf, Christoph Schliemann, Jan-Henrik Mikesch, Utz Krug, Mathias Hänel, Anke Morgner, Markus Schaich, Andreas Neubauer, Roland Repp, Dirk Niemann, Ruth Seggewiss-Bernhardt, Achim Meinhardt, Johannes Kullmer, Ulrich Kaiser, Wolfgang Blau, Alexander Kiani, Götz Ulrich Grigoleit, Aristoteles Giagounidis, Alexander A Wurm, Heidi Altmann, Jan Moritz Middeke, Johannes Schetelig, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Friedrich Stölzel, Claudia D Baldus, Uwe Platzbecker, Hubert Serve, Martin Bornhäuser, Christian Thiede, Christoph Röllig
{"title":"Validation of the revised 2022 European LeukemiaNet risk stratification in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia.","authors":"Leo Ruhnke, Marius Bill, Sven Zukunft, Jan-Niklas Eckardt, Silvia Schäfer, Sebastian Stasik, Maher Hanoun, Thomas Schroeder, Lars Fransecky, Björn Steffen, Stefan W Krause, Sebastian Scholl, Andreas Hochhaus, Tim Sauer, Sabrina Kraus, Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart, Martin Kaufmann, Edgar Jost, Tim Brümmendorf, Christoph Schliemann, Jan-Henrik Mikesch, Utz Krug, Mathias Hänel, Anke Morgner, Markus Schaich, Andreas Neubauer, Roland Repp, Dirk Niemann, Ruth Seggewiss-Bernhardt, Achim Meinhardt, Johannes Kullmer, Ulrich Kaiser, Wolfgang Blau, Alexander Kiani, Götz Ulrich Grigoleit, Aristoteles Giagounidis, Alexander A Wurm, Heidi Altmann, Jan Moritz Middeke, Johannes Schetelig, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Friedrich Stölzel, Claudia D Baldus, Uwe Platzbecker, Hubert Serve, Martin Bornhäuser, Christian Thiede, Christoph Röllig","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In 2022, the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been updated. We aimed to validate the prognostic value of the 2022 ELN classification (ELN22) by evaluating 1570 patients with newly diagnosed AML (median age, 56 years) treated with cytarabine-based intensive chemotherapy regimens. Compared with 2017 ELN classification (ELN17), which allocated 595 (38%), 413 (26%), and 562 patients (36%) to the favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk categories, ELN22 classified 575 (37%), 410 (26%), and 585 patients (37%) as favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk, respectively. Risk group allocation was revised in 340 patients (22%). Most patients were reclassified into the ELN22 intermediate- or ELN22 adverse-risk group. The allocation of patients according to the ELN22 risk categories resulted in a significantly distinct event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Compared with ELN17, reallocation according to the ELN22 recommendations resulted in a significantly improved prognostic discrimination for OS (3-year area under the curve, 0.71 vs 0.67). In patients with ELN22 favorable-risk AML, co-occurring myelodysplasia-related (MR) gene mutations did not significantly affect outcomes. Within the ELN22 adverse-risk group, we observed marked survival differences across mutational groups (5-year OS rate of 21% and 3% in patients with MR gene mutations and TP53 mutations, respectively). In patients harboring MR gene mutations, EZH2-, STAG2-, and ZRSR2-mutated patients showed an intermediate-like OS. In patients with secondary AML and those who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, EFS and OS significantly differed between ELN22 risk groups, whereas the prognostic abilities of ELN17 and ELN22 classifications were similar. In conclusion, ELN22 improves prognostic discrimination in a large cohort of intensively treated patients with AML. Given the heterogeneous outcome in patients with MR gene alterations, ranging between those of intermediate and adverse risk patients, we suggest re-evaluation of risk allocation in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":"1392-1404"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013304","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In 2022, the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been updated. We aimed to validate the prognostic value of the 2022 ELN classification (ELN22) by evaluating 1570 patients with newly diagnosed AML (median age, 56 years) treated with cytarabine-based intensive chemotherapy regimens. Compared with 2017 ELN classification (ELN17), which allocated 595 (38%), 413 (26%), and 562 patients (36%) to the favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk categories, ELN22 classified 575 (37%), 410 (26%), and 585 patients (37%) as favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk, respectively. Risk group allocation was revised in 340 patients (22%). Most patients were reclassified into the ELN22 intermediate- or ELN22 adverse-risk group. The allocation of patients according to the ELN22 risk categories resulted in a significantly distinct event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Compared with ELN17, reallocation according to the ELN22 recommendations resulted in a significantly improved prognostic discrimination for OS (3-year area under the curve, 0.71 vs 0.67). In patients with ELN22 favorable-risk AML, co-occurring myelodysplasia-related (MR) gene mutations did not significantly affect outcomes. Within the ELN22 adverse-risk group, we observed marked survival differences across mutational groups (5-year OS rate of 21% and 3% in patients with MR gene mutations and TP53 mutations, respectively). In patients harboring MR gene mutations, EZH2-, STAG2-, and ZRSR2-mutated patients showed an intermediate-like OS. In patients with secondary AML and those who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, EFS and OS significantly differed between ELN22 risk groups, whereas the prognostic abilities of ELN17 and ELN22 classifications were similar. In conclusion, ELN22 improves prognostic discrimination in a large cohort of intensively treated patients with AML. Given the heterogeneous outcome in patients with MR gene alterations, ranging between those of intermediate and adverse risk patients, we suggest re-evaluation of risk allocation in these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修订后的 2022 年欧洲白血病网络急性髓性白血病成人患者风险分层法的验证。
2022年,欧洲白血病网络(ELN)对急性髓细胞白血病患者的风险分层进行了更新。我们旨在验证2022年ELN分类(ELN22)的预后价值,对1570名接受以细胞抑制剂为基础的强化化疗方案治疗的新诊断AML患者(中位年龄56岁)进行了评估。与2017年的ELN分类(ELN17)相比,ELN22将595例(38%)、413例(26%)和562例(36%)患者划分为良好、中等和不良风险类别,而575例(37%)、410例(26%)和585例(37%)患者的风险分别为良好、中等和不良。340名患者(22%)的风险组别分配进行了修订。大多数患者被重新划分为 ELN22 中度风险组或 ELN22 不良风险组。根据ELN22风险类别分配患者后,无事件生存期(EFS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)明显不同。与ELN17相比,根据ELN22建议重新分配后,OS的预后判别能力明显提高(3年曲线下面积(AUC)为0.71对0.67)。在ELN22高风险急性髓细胞白血病患者中,共存的MR基因突变对预后没有显著影响。在ELN22不良风险组中,我们观察到不同基因突变组之间存在明显的生存差异(骨髓增生异常相关(MR)基因突变患者和TP53基因突变患者的5年OS率分别为21%和3%)。在携带MR基因突变的患者中,EZH2-、STAG2-和ZRSR2突变患者的OS为中等水平。在继发性急性髓细胞性白血病患者和接受异基因造血干细胞移植的患者中,ELN22风险组的EFS和OS有显著差异,而ELN17和ELN22分类的预后能力相似。总之,ELN22风险分层提高了大量接受强化治疗的急性髓细胞性白血病患者的预后鉴别能力。鉴于MR基因改变患者的预后不一,介于中危和不良风险患者之间,我们建议重新评估这些患者的风险分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
期刊最新文献
American Society of Hematology living guidelines on use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis for patients with COVID-19: executive summary. Validation of the revised 2022 European LeukemiaNet risk stratification in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Anxiety and depression in patients with histiocytic neoplasms and their associated clinical features. Health care systems as determinants of outcomes in multiple myeloma: final results from the Latin American MYLACRE study. High pulmonary hypertension risk by echocardiogram shortens survival in polycythemia vera.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1