The Association Between Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusions and 1-Year Mortality After Major Cancer Surgery: An International Multicenter Observational Study.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007236
Juan P Cata, Juan Jose Guerra-Londono, Maria F Ramirez, Lee-Lynn Chen, Matthew A Warner, Luis Felipe Cuellar Guzman, Francisco Lobo, Santiago Uribe-Marquez, Jeffrey Huang, Katarina J Ruscic, Sophia Tsong Huey Chew, Megan Lanigan
{"title":"The Association Between Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusions and 1-Year Mortality After Major Cancer Surgery: An International Multicenter Observational Study.","authors":"Juan P Cata, Juan Jose Guerra-Londono, Maria F Ramirez, Lee-Lynn Chen, Matthew A Warner, Luis Felipe Cuellar Guzman, Francisco Lobo, Santiago Uribe-Marquez, Jeffrey Huang, Katarina J Ruscic, Sophia Tsong Huey Chew, Megan Lanigan","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions in patients undergoing surgery for cancer are given to treat anemia or acute hemorrhage. Evidence indicates that pRBC transfusions are associated with poor perioperative and oncological outcomes. The ARCA-1 (Perioperative Care in the Cancer Patient-1) study was designed to test the association between perioperative pRBC transfusions and postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cancer surgery. The primary hypothesis of our study was that perioperative pRBC transfusions have a negative impact on postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ARCA-1 was an international multicenter prospective observational cohort study. Participating centers enrolled a minimum of 30 consecutive adult patients with cancer who underwent surgery with curative intent. The primary end point was all-cause mortality 1 year after major cancer surgery. Secondary end points were rates of perioperative blood product use, 1-year cancer-specific mortality, overall survival, and 30-day morbidity and mortality. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to adjust for selection bias. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the effects of significant covariates on 1-year mortality, cancer-related mortality, and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1079 patients were included in the study. The rate of perioperative pRBC transfusions was 21.1%. Preoperative comorbidities, including anemia, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III to IV, a history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), myocardial infarction, stroke, need for dialysis, history of blood transfusions, and metastatic disease were statistically significantly more frequent in transfused patients compared to nontransfused patients. The 1-year mortality rate was higher in transfused patients before (19.7% vs 6.5%; P < .0001) and after (17.4% vs 13.2%; P = .29) propensity score matching. 1-year mortality was 1.97 times higher in transfused than in no-transfused patients (odd ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-3.41). The odds of 1-year cancer mortality for patients who had perioperative pRBCs was 1.82 times higher (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.97-3.43) compared to those who did not receive perioperative pRBC transfusion. The effect of perioperative pRBC transfusion on overall survival was also significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.15-2.99). Transfused patients also had a higher rate of 30-day postoperative mortality before (3.5% vs 0.7%; P = .0009) and after propensity score matching (4.2% vs 1.8%; P = .34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This international, multicenter observational study showed that perioperative pRBC transfusion was associated with an increased mortality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions in patients undergoing surgery for cancer are given to treat anemia or acute hemorrhage. Evidence indicates that pRBC transfusions are associated with poor perioperative and oncological outcomes. The ARCA-1 (Perioperative Care in the Cancer Patient-1) study was designed to test the association between perioperative pRBC transfusions and postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cancer surgery. The primary hypothesis of our study was that perioperative pRBC transfusions have a negative impact on postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality.

Methods: ARCA-1 was an international multicenter prospective observational cohort study. Participating centers enrolled a minimum of 30 consecutive adult patients with cancer who underwent surgery with curative intent. The primary end point was all-cause mortality 1 year after major cancer surgery. Secondary end points were rates of perioperative blood product use, 1-year cancer-specific mortality, overall survival, and 30-day morbidity and mortality. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to adjust for selection bias. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the effects of significant covariates on 1-year mortality, cancer-related mortality, and overall survival.

Results: A total of 1079 patients were included in the study. The rate of perioperative pRBC transfusions was 21.1%. Preoperative comorbidities, including anemia, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III to IV, a history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), myocardial infarction, stroke, need for dialysis, history of blood transfusions, and metastatic disease were statistically significantly more frequent in transfused patients compared to nontransfused patients. The 1-year mortality rate was higher in transfused patients before (19.7% vs 6.5%; P < .0001) and after (17.4% vs 13.2%; P = .29) propensity score matching. 1-year mortality was 1.97 times higher in transfused than in no-transfused patients (odd ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-3.41). The odds of 1-year cancer mortality for patients who had perioperative pRBCs was 1.82 times higher (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.97-3.43) compared to those who did not receive perioperative pRBC transfusion. The effect of perioperative pRBC transfusion on overall survival was also significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.15-2.99). Transfused patients also had a higher rate of 30-day postoperative mortality before (3.5% vs 0.7%; P = .0009) and after propensity score matching (4.2% vs 1.8%; P = .34).

Conclusions: This international, multicenter observational study showed that perioperative pRBC transfusion was associated with an increased mortality risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症大手术后围手术期输注红细胞与 1 年死亡率之间的关系:一项国际多中心观察研究。
背景:癌症手术患者输注成组红细胞(pRBC)是为了治疗贫血或急性出血。有证据表明,输注 pRBC 与围手术期和肿瘤治疗效果不佳有关。ARCA-1(癌症患者围手术期护理-1)研究旨在检验癌症手术患者围手术期输注 pRBC 与术后发病率和死亡率之间的关系。我们研究的主要假设是围手术期 pRBC 输血对术后发病率和 1 年死亡率有负面影响:ARCA-1 是一项国际多中心前瞻性观察队列研究。参与研究的中心至少连续招募了 30 名以治愈为目的接受手术的成年癌症患者。主要终点是癌症大手术后一年的全因死亡率。次要终点是围手术期血液制品使用率、1 年癌症特异性死亡率、总生存率以及 30 天发病率和死亡率。我们进行了倾向评分匹配分析,以调整选择偏差。我们建立了一个多变量逻辑回归模型,以估计重要协变量对1年死亡率、癌症相关死亡率和总生存率的影响:研究共纳入了 1079 名患者。围手术期 pRBC 输血率为 21.1%。术前合并症,包括贫血、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分 III 至 IV 级、2019 年冠状病毒病史(COVID-19)、心肌梗死、中风、需要透析、输血史和转移性疾病,从统计学角度看,输血患者的发生率明显高于未输血患者。在倾向评分匹配之前(19.7% vs 6.5%;P < .0001)和之后(17.4% vs 13.2%;P = .29),输血患者的 1 年死亡率均较高。输血患者的 1 年死亡率是未输血患者的 1.97 倍(奇数比 [OR],1.97;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.13-3.41)。与未接受围手术期 pRBC 输血的患者相比,接受围手术期 pRBC 输血的患者 1 年癌症死亡率是未接受围手术期 pRBC 输血患者的 1.82 倍(OR,1.82;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.97-3.43)。围手术期输注 pRBC 对总生存率的影响也很显著(危险比 [HR],1.85;95% CI,1.15-2.99)。输血前(3.5% vs 0.7%;P = .0009)和倾向评分匹配后(4.2% vs 1.8%;P = .34),输血患者的术后 30 天死亡率也较高:这项国际多中心观察性研究表明,围手术期输注 pRBC 与死亡率风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
期刊最新文献
Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Airway Evaluation in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis: A Prospective Cohort Study. A Little Blue Butterfly. A Paradigm for Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Anesthesia Practice for Children with Autism for the Generalist Clinician. Association Between Two Muscle-Related Parameters and Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Tumor Resection Surgery. Cannabinoids and General Anesthetics: Revisiting Molecular Mechanisms of Their Pharmacological Interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1