Identifying an optimal cancer risk threshold for resection of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hpb Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.006
Greg D. Sacks , Luke Wojtalik , Sarah R. Kaslow , Christina A. Penfield , Stella K. Kang , D.B. Hewitt , Ammar A. Javed , Christopher L. Wolfgang , R.S. Braithwaite
{"title":"Identifying an optimal cancer risk threshold for resection of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms","authors":"Greg D. Sacks ,&nbsp;Luke Wojtalik ,&nbsp;Sarah R. Kaslow ,&nbsp;Christina A. Penfield ,&nbsp;Stella K. Kang ,&nbsp;D.B. Hewitt ,&nbsp;Ammar A. Javed ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Wolfgang ,&nbsp;R.S. Braithwaite","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2024.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>IPMN consensus guidelines make implicit judgments on what cancer risk level should prompt surgery. We used decision modeling to estimate this cancer risk threshold (CRT) for BD-IPMN patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We created a decision model to compare quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) following surgery or surveillance for BD-IPMNs. We simulated treatment decisions for hypothetical patients, varying age, comorbidities and lesion location (pancreatic head/tail). The base case was a 60-year-old patient with mild comorbidities and pancreatic head IPMN. Probabilities, life expectancies, and utilities were incorporated from literature/public datasets. CRT was defined as the level of cancer risk at which the expected value of QALYs for surgery first exceeded that of surveillance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the base case, surgery was preferred over surveillance, yielding 21.90 vs. 21.88 QALYs. The optimal CRT for a BD-IPMN patient depended on age, comorbidities, and location. CRT in the base case was 20 % and 3 % for an IPMN in the head and tail of the pancreas, respectively. Other drivers of preferred treatment were age and likelihood of postoperative mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For BD-IPMNs, the optimal CRT varies depending on patient age and risk of surgical complications. Personalized risk threshold values could guide treatment decisions and inform future treatment consensus guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 94-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365182X24023761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

IPMN consensus guidelines make implicit judgments on what cancer risk level should prompt surgery. We used decision modeling to estimate this cancer risk threshold (CRT) for BD-IPMN patients.

Methods

We created a decision model to compare quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) following surgery or surveillance for BD-IPMNs. We simulated treatment decisions for hypothetical patients, varying age, comorbidities and lesion location (pancreatic head/tail). The base case was a 60-year-old patient with mild comorbidities and pancreatic head IPMN. Probabilities, life expectancies, and utilities were incorporated from literature/public datasets. CRT was defined as the level of cancer risk at which the expected value of QALYs for surgery first exceeded that of surveillance.

Results

In the base case, surgery was preferred over surveillance, yielding 21.90 vs. 21.88 QALYs. The optimal CRT for a BD-IPMN patient depended on age, comorbidities, and location. CRT in the base case was 20 % and 3 % for an IPMN in the head and tail of the pancreas, respectively. Other drivers of preferred treatment were age and likelihood of postoperative mortality.

Conclusion

For BD-IPMNs, the optimal CRT varies depending on patient age and risk of surgical complications. Personalized risk threshold values could guide treatment decisions and inform future treatment consensus guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定切除胰腺导管内乳头状黏液瘤的最佳癌症风险阈值。
背景:IPMN共识指南对何种癌症风险水平应进行手术做出了隐性判断。我们使用决策模型来估算 BD-IPMN 患者的癌症风险阈值(CRT):我们创建了一个决策模型来比较 BD-IPMN 手术或监测后的质量调整生命年 (QALY)。我们模拟了不同年龄、合并症和病变位置(胰头/胰尾)的假设患者的治疗决策。基础病例是一名 60 岁的患者,合并症较轻,患有胰头 IPMN。概率、预期寿命和效用均来自文献/公共数据集。CRT被定义为癌症风险水平,在这一水平上,手术的QALYs预期值首先超过监测的QALYs预期值:结果:在基础病例中,手术优于监测,其 QALYs 为 21.90:21.88。BD-IPMN患者的最佳CRT取决于年龄、合并症和发病部位。在基础病例中,胰头和胰尾 IPMN 的 CRT 分别为 20% 和 3%。其他影响首选治疗的因素包括年龄和术后死亡的可能性:结论:对于BD-IPMNs,最佳CRT因患者年龄和手术并发症风险而异。个性化的风险阈值可指导治疗决策,并为未来的治疗共识指南提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hpb
Hpb GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication. Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice. Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice. HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields. Abstracted and Indexed in: MEDLINE® EMBASE PubMed Science Citation Index Expanded Academic Search (EBSCO) HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).
期刊最新文献
Conference Calendar Contents Percutaneous hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines in treatment-resistant colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study ChatGPT vs. surgeons on pancreatic cancer queries: accuracy & empathy evaluated by patients and experts Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for genetic analysis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1