Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Placebo Response in Randomized Controlled Trials of Tourette’s Disorder Medications

Pedro Macul Ferreira de Barros MD , Luis C. Farhat MD, PhD , Emily Behling MD , Madeeha Nasir MBBS, MS , Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger MD , Michael H. Bloch MD, MS
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Placebo Response in Randomized Controlled Trials of Tourette’s Disorder Medications","authors":"Pedro Macul Ferreira de Barros MD ,&nbsp;Luis C. Farhat MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Emily Behling MD ,&nbsp;Madeeha Nasir MBBS, MS ,&nbsp;Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger MD ,&nbsp;Michael H. Bloch MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the magnitude of placebo response in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of medications for Tourette’s disorder.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, WHO ICTRP, and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> databases were searched up to September, 2023 to identify placebo-controlled RCTs assessing pharmacological interventions for Tourette’s disorder. Standardized mean change and standardized mean difference were calculated for within-group (placebo, drug) and between-group (drug-placebo) change in tics. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regressions were performed to identify study-level characteristics that could be differentially associated with placebo, drug, and drug-placebo response.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Literature searches identified 13,775 records, and 50 RCTs involving 1,566 participants were included in the placebo meta-analysis. Placebo response was medium to large (standardized mean change: −0.62; 95% CI: −0.75, −0.5; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 76%; τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.14). Several factors were associated with larger placebo responses (eg, non-US RCT, industry sponsorship, number of centers and participants). However, there was a moderate-to-high correlation between placebo and drug response (ρ = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.79), and factors associated with larger placebo response were also generally associated with larger drug responses. There was not a significant correlation between placebo response and drug-placebo differences (ρ = −0.05; 95% CI: −0.32, 0.22), and factors associated with larger placebo response generally did not interfere in drug-placebo differences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The magnitude of placebo response in Tourette’s disorder may be large, but similar to that in other child and adolescent psychiatric conditions. Clinical researchers may manipulate study-level factors to diminish placebo response (eg, carefully selecting study sites and keeping them at the minimum feasibility). However, drug-placebo differences may not increase as drug response will likely diminish as well.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>This study utilized data from 50 placebo-controlled clinical trials involving 1,566 participants of medicines for Tourette’s disorder to determine the magnitude and correlates of improvement during treatment with placebo. Individuals in the placebo arm experienced considerable improvement throughout the duration of clinical trials, and there were also several study-level factors that were associated with greater improvement in the placebo arm. However, those factors were also generally associated with larger improvement in the drug arm and did not interfere with drug-placebo differences, which inform whether treatments were efficacious or not. The findings are relevant for designing and conducting pharmacological randomized controlled trials in Tourette’s disorder.</div></div><div><h3>Study preregistration information</h3><div>Comparative Efficacy, Tolerability, and Acceptability of Pharmacological Interventions for Chronic Tic Disorders Including Tourette’s Syndrome in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis; <span><span>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022296975</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div><div><h3>Diversity &amp; Inclusion Statement</h3><div>One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"64 5","pages":"Pages 577-592"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890856724019737","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the magnitude of placebo response in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of medications for Tourette’s disorder.

Method

CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched up to September, 2023 to identify placebo-controlled RCTs assessing pharmacological interventions for Tourette’s disorder. Standardized mean change and standardized mean difference were calculated for within-group (placebo, drug) and between-group (drug-placebo) change in tics. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regressions were performed to identify study-level characteristics that could be differentially associated with placebo, drug, and drug-placebo response.

Results

Literature searches identified 13,775 records, and 50 RCTs involving 1,566 participants were included in the placebo meta-analysis. Placebo response was medium to large (standardized mean change: −0.62; 95% CI: −0.75, −0.5; I2 = 76%; τ2 = 0.14). Several factors were associated with larger placebo responses (eg, non-US RCT, industry sponsorship, number of centers and participants). However, there was a moderate-to-high correlation between placebo and drug response (ρ = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.79), and factors associated with larger placebo response were also generally associated with larger drug responses. There was not a significant correlation between placebo response and drug-placebo differences (ρ = −0.05; 95% CI: −0.32, 0.22), and factors associated with larger placebo response generally did not interfere in drug-placebo differences.

Conclusion

The magnitude of placebo response in Tourette’s disorder may be large, but similar to that in other child and adolescent psychiatric conditions. Clinical researchers may manipulate study-level factors to diminish placebo response (eg, carefully selecting study sites and keeping them at the minimum feasibility). However, drug-placebo differences may not increase as drug response will likely diminish as well.

Plain language summary

This study utilized data from 50 placebo-controlled clinical trials involving 1,566 participants of medicines for Tourette’s disorder to determine the magnitude and correlates of improvement during treatment with placebo. Individuals in the placebo arm experienced considerable improvement throughout the duration of clinical trials, and there were also several study-level factors that were associated with greater improvement in the placebo arm. However, those factors were also generally associated with larger improvement in the drug arm and did not interfere with drug-placebo differences, which inform whether treatments were efficacious or not. The findings are relevant for designing and conducting pharmacological randomized controlled trials in Tourette’s disorder.

Study preregistration information

Comparative Efficacy, Tolerability, and Acceptability of Pharmacological Interventions for Chronic Tic Disorders Including Tourette’s Syndrome in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022296975

Diversity & Inclusion Statement

One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统回顾和元分析:妥瑞症药物随机对照试验中的安慰剂反应。
目的:研究治疗妥瑞症的随机对照试验(RCT)中安慰剂反应的程度:研究治疗妥瑞症(TD)药物的随机对照试验(RCT)中安慰剂反应的程度:我们检索了 CENTRAL、Embase、PubMed、PsycInfo、Web of Science、WHO ICTRP 和 ClinicalTrials.gov,以确定评估 TD 药物干预的安慰剂对照 RCT。计算了组内(安慰剂、药物)和组间(药物-安慰剂)抽搐变化的标准化平均变化(SMC)和标准化平均差。在随机效应荟萃分析中对数据进行了汇总。我们还进行了元回归分析,以确定与安慰剂、药物和药物-安慰剂反应相关的研究水平特征:我们确定了 13,775 条记录,并在安慰剂荟萃分析中纳入了 50 项 RCT,涉及 1,566 名参与者。安慰剂反应为中至大反应(SMC -0.62;95% 置信区间 [CI] -0.75 至 -0.5;I2 76%;τ2 0.14)。有几个因素与较大的安慰剂反应有关(例如,非美国 RCT;行业赞助;中心和参与者数量)。然而,安慰剂和药物反应之间存在中高相关性(ρ 0.66,95% CI 0.47,0.79),与较大安慰剂反应相关的因素通常也与较大药物反应相关。此外,安慰剂反应与药物-安慰剂差异之间没有明显的相关性(ρ -0.05,95% CI -0.32,0.22),与较大安慰剂反应相关的因素一般不会干扰药物-安慰剂差异:结论:TD的安慰剂反应幅度可能较大,但与其他儿童精神病学疾病的安慰剂反应类似。临床研究人员可能会操纵研究层面的因素来减少安慰剂反应(例如,精心选择研究地点并将其保持在最低可行性水平)。然而,药物与安慰剂之间的差异可能不会增加,因为药物反应可能也会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
期刊最新文献
Pragmatic Indicated Prevention and Early Intervention for Disordered Eating: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Media Smart Targeted Internet Program in Youth. The Price and Quality of Methylphenidate Products. Editorial: Cautious Optimism for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: What Does the Evidence Show? Editorial: Cognitive Development in Offspring of Individuals Living With Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia: Opportunities for Early Identification and Support Editorial: Rising Psychotropic Medication Use Among US Youth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1