A Need for Targeted Teaching of Shared Decision-Making as Identified from an Assessment of Client-Centered Communication Skills Training with Companion Animal Veterinarians.

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of veterinary medical education Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.3138/jvme-2024-0016
Natasha Janke, Jane R Shaw, Jason B Coe
{"title":"A Need for Targeted Teaching of Shared Decision-Making as Identified from an Assessment of Client-Centered Communication Skills Training with Companion Animal Veterinarians.","authors":"Natasha Janke, Jane R Shaw, Jason B Coe","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2024-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shared decision-making has been increasingly discussed as a communication practice within veterinary medicine, and it is gaining more traction for diagnostic and treatment planning conversations and specifically offering a spectrum of care. This teaching tip describes the data from an investigation of veterinarians' shared decision-making in a pre-test/post-test communication skills training intervention that used a client-centered, skills-based communication approach. Practice teams from a purposive sample of four companion animal veterinary clinics in Texas participated in a 15-month communication skills intervention, including interactive group workshops and one-on-one communication coaching. To assess the outcome of the intervention, for nine participating veterinarians, appointments recorded pre- (<i>n </i>=<i> </i>85) and post-intervention (<i>n </i>=<i> </i> 85) were analyzed using the Observer OPTION 5 instrument to assess shared decision-making. The intervention effect was evaluated using mixed logistic regression, adjusting for appointment type. The communication intervention did not significantly impact participating veterinarians' demonstration of shared decision-making (pre<i> </i>=<i> </i>25.42, <i>n </i>=<i> </i>55; post<i> </i>=<i> </i>28.03, <i>n </i>=<i> </i>56; <i>p </i>=<i> </i>0.36). Appointment type was significantly associated with veterinarians' OPTION 5 scores (<i>p </i>=<i> </i>.0004) and health problem appointments (OPTION 5<i> </i>=<i> </i>30.07) demonstrated greater shared decision-making than preventive care appointments (OPTION 5<i> </i>=<i> </i>22.81). Findings suggest that client-centered, skills-based training traditionally used in veterinary curricula and continuing education may not foster the use of shared decision-making, which is a higher-order communication approach that may require a dedicated process-oriented training. This teaching tip highlights the need for a targeted stepwise approach to teach shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2024-0016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared decision-making has been increasingly discussed as a communication practice within veterinary medicine, and it is gaining more traction for diagnostic and treatment planning conversations and specifically offering a spectrum of care. This teaching tip describes the data from an investigation of veterinarians' shared decision-making in a pre-test/post-test communication skills training intervention that used a client-centered, skills-based communication approach. Practice teams from a purposive sample of four companion animal veterinary clinics in Texas participated in a 15-month communication skills intervention, including interactive group workshops and one-on-one communication coaching. To assess the outcome of the intervention, for nine participating veterinarians, appointments recorded pre- (= 85) and post-intervention (=  85) were analyzed using the Observer OPTION 5 instrument to assess shared decision-making. The intervention effect was evaluated using mixed logistic regression, adjusting for appointment type. The communication intervention did not significantly impact participating veterinarians' demonstration of shared decision-making (pre = 25.42, = 55; post = 28.03, = 56; = 0.36). Appointment type was significantly associated with veterinarians' OPTION 5 scores (= .0004) and health problem appointments (OPTION 5 = 30.07) demonstrated greater shared decision-making than preventive care appointments (OPTION 5 = 22.81). Findings suggest that client-centered, skills-based training traditionally used in veterinary curricula and continuing education may not foster the use of shared decision-making, which is a higher-order communication approach that may require a dedicated process-oriented training. This teaching tip highlights the need for a targeted stepwise approach to teach shared decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对伴侣动物兽医以客户为中心的沟通技巧培训进行评估后发现,需要有针对性地教授共同决策。
共同决策作为兽医学中的一种沟通实践,已经得到越来越多的讨论,它在诊断和治疗计划对话中,特别是在提供全面护理方面,正获得越来越多的关注。本教学提示介绍了一项调查数据,调查内容是兽医在采用以客户为中心、以技能为基础的沟通方法进行的沟通技能培训干预中的前测/后测共享决策。来自德克萨斯州四家伴侣动物兽医诊所的特定样本实践团队参加了为期15个月的沟通技巧干预,包括互动小组研讨会和一对一沟通辅导。为了评估干预的效果,我们使用观察者 OPTION 5 工具分析了九名参与干预的兽医在干预前(n = 85)和干预后(n = 85)的预约记录,以评估共同决策。使用混合逻辑回归评估了干预效果,并对预约类型进行了调整。沟通干预并未对参与的兽医展示共同决策产生明显影响(前=25.42,n=55;后=28.03,n=56;p=0.36)。预约类型与兽医的 OPTION 5 分数有明显关联(p = 0.0004),健康问题预约(OPTION 5 = 30.07)比预防性护理预约(OPTION 5 = 22.81)更能体现共同决策。研究结果表明,兽医课程和继续教育中传统使用的以客户为中心、以技能为基础的培训可能无法促进共同决策的使用,而共同决策是一种高阶沟通方法,可能需要专门的以过程为导向的培训。这一教学提示强调了有针对性地逐步教授共同决策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Analysis of Intern Applications and its Relationship to Performance. Case-Based Learning: An Analysis of Student Groupwork and Instructional Design that Promotes Collaborative Discussion. The Effect of Repeated Review of Course Content on Medium- and Long-Term Retention in an Elective Veterinary Cardiology Course. Companion Animal Cadaver Donation for Teaching Purposes at Veterinary Medicine Colleges: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Changing Perceptions of Veterinary Undergraduates to Module Re-Structuring as They Progress Through the Curriculum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1