Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Monitoring Program Using Bayesian Modeling in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae600
Eric Gillett, Muneerah M Aleissa, Jeffrey C Pearson, Daniel A Solomon, David W Kubiak, Brandon Dionne, Heba H Edrees, Adetoun Okenla, Brian T Chan
{"title":"Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Monitoring Program Using Bayesian Modeling in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.","authors":"Eric Gillett, Muneerah M Aleissa, Jeffrey C Pearson, Daniel A Solomon, David W Kubiak, Brandon Dionne, Heba H Edrees, Adetoun Okenla, Brian T Chan","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current vancomycin monitoring guidelines recommend monitoring 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration ratios for patients with serious methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> infections. However, there are sparse data on the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of vancomycin AUC monitoring for outpatients. Traditional AUC pharmacokinetic calculations require 2 concentrations, while bayesian software allows for single-concentration AUC estimations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, quasi-experimental, interrupted time series study of patients enrolled in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program at our institution for vancomycin management. Our institution implemented a pharmacist-driven vancomycin AUC monitoring program from September 2019 to February 2020, and again from September 2022 to March 2023. Patients enrolled underwent vancomycin monitoring using an AUC goal of 400-600 mg⋅h/L, estimated through bayesian modeling. Patients enrolled in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program from July 2021 through August 2022 for trough-based monitoring were used for comparison. The primary outcome was nephrotoxicity incidence, defined as a serum creatinine increase by ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥50% during outpatient vancomycin therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 63 patients in the AUC group and 60 patients in the trough-based group. Nephrotoxicity was significantly lower in the AUC cohort (6.3% vs 23.3%; <i>P</i> = .01). The number of unusable vancomycin concentrations was also significantly lower in the AUC cohort (0% vs 6%; <i>P</i> < .01). There was no difference in composite 90-day all-cause mortality or readmission (33.3% vs 38.3%; <i>P</i> = .56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following implementation of a pharmacist-driven AUC monitoring program, patients were less likely to develop nephrotoxicity during outpatient vancomycin therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"11 11","pages":"ofae600"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current vancomycin monitoring guidelines recommend monitoring 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration ratios for patients with serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. However, there are sparse data on the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of vancomycin AUC monitoring for outpatients. Traditional AUC pharmacokinetic calculations require 2 concentrations, while bayesian software allows for single-concentration AUC estimations.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, quasi-experimental, interrupted time series study of patients enrolled in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program at our institution for vancomycin management. Our institution implemented a pharmacist-driven vancomycin AUC monitoring program from September 2019 to February 2020, and again from September 2022 to March 2023. Patients enrolled underwent vancomycin monitoring using an AUC goal of 400-600 mg⋅h/L, estimated through bayesian modeling. Patients enrolled in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program from July 2021 through August 2022 for trough-based monitoring were used for comparison. The primary outcome was nephrotoxicity incidence, defined as a serum creatinine increase by ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥50% during outpatient vancomycin therapy.

Results: We enrolled 63 patients in the AUC group and 60 patients in the trough-based group. Nephrotoxicity was significantly lower in the AUC cohort (6.3% vs 23.3%; P = .01). The number of unusable vancomycin concentrations was also significantly lower in the AUC cohort (0% vs 6%; P < .01). There was no difference in composite 90-day all-cause mortality or readmission (33.3% vs 38.3%; P = .56).

Conclusions: Following implementation of a pharmacist-driven AUC monitoring program, patients were less likely to develop nephrotoxicity during outpatient vancomycin therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在门诊外用抗菌药物治疗中使用贝叶斯模型实施药剂师驱动的万古霉素浓度-时间曲线面积监测计划。
背景:目前的万古霉素监测指南建议对严重耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者进行 24 小时浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)与最低抑菌浓度比值的监测。然而,关于门诊患者万古霉素 AUC 监测的安全性、可行性和有效性的数据却很少。传统的 AUC 药代动力学计算需要两个浓度,而贝叶斯软件可进行单浓度 AUC 估算:我们进行了一项单中心、准实验性、间断时间序列研究,研究对象是我院门诊肠外抗菌治疗项目的万古霉素管理患者。我院于 2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 2 月实施了药剂师驱动的万古霉素 AUC 监测计划,并于 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月再次实施该计划。通过贝叶斯模型估算,入组患者接受万古霉素监测的 AUC 目标为 400-600 mg⋅h/L。2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 8 月参加门诊肠外抗菌治疗计划、接受基于谷值监测的患者用于比较。主要结果是肾毒性发生率,定义为门诊万古霉素治疗期间血清肌酐升高≥0.5 mg/dL 或≥50%:我们在AUC组和基于谷值组分别招募了63名和60名患者。AUC组的肾毒性明显较低(6.3% vs 23.3%; P = .01)。AUC组中无法使用的万古霉素浓度也明显较低(0% vs 6%; P < .01)。90天综合全因死亡率或再入院率没有差异(33.3% vs 38.3%; P = .56):结论:实施药剂师驱动的AUC监测计划后,患者在门诊万古霉素治疗期间发生肾毒性的可能性降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Early Combination Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation During Primary HIV Infection Restricts HIV Reservoirs and Gut-Driven Inflammation but Fails to Rewire the Systemic Cytokine Landscape. Correction to: Prevalence and factors associated with Aspergillus galactomannan antigenemia among People Living with Advanced HIV Disease in Uganda. Assessment of Antimicrobial Transition Errors from Hospitals to Skilled Nursing Facilities. HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Utilization and Reasons for Never Using Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Transfeminine Persons in the United States: Findings From the Transgender Women's Internet Survey and Testing (TWIST) Study. Leptospirosis Incidence at Four Sites in Sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: An International Multi-Site Hybrid Surveillance Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1