Serious adverse events reported with benzimidazole derivatives: A disproportionality analysis from the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0012634
Pamella Modingam, Jean-Luc Faillie, Jérémy T Campillo
{"title":"Serious adverse events reported with benzimidazole derivatives: A disproportionality analysis from the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database.","authors":"Pamella Modingam, Jean-Luc Faillie, Jérémy T Campillo","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0012634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benzimidazole derivatives are widely used anthelmintic drugs, particularly in mass campaigns for intestinal parasitosis treatment. Despite their generally good safety profile, serious adverse reactions have been reported. This study aims to identify potential pharmacovigilance signals for benzimidazole derivatives using disproportionality analysis in the WHO database.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A case/non-case study was conducted using data from the WHO VigiBase database (2000-2023). Cases were individual case safety reports (ICSRs) where at least one suspected serious adverse event of interest was reported, while non-cases were ICSRs reporting any adverse events other than the serious adverse events of interest. Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess disproportionate reporting. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounding factors and a sensitivity analysis with imputed missing data was performed.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Among 19,068 serious reports analyzed, significant disproportionality signals were found for benzimidazole derivatives compared to other anthelmintic drugs, notably for bone marrow failure and hypoplastic anemia (adjusted ROR 9.44 [5.01-18.9]), serious leukopenia (3.89 [2.64-5.76]), serious hepatic disorders (3.10 [2.59-3.71]), hepatitis (2.88, 95% CI 2.29-3.63) and serious urticaria (2.02, 95% CI 1.36-2.99). We have also highlighted a new signal not mentioned in the summaries of product characteristics for seizures with benzimidazole derivatives. Secondary analysis revealed these signals were primarily reported with albendazole.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/significance: </strong>This study identified potential pharmacovigilance signals for serious hematological and hepatic adverse events for benzimidazole derivatives, particularly albendazole. New signal for benzimidazole derivatives has been described for seizures. These findings underscore the need for vigilant monitoring during benzimidazole derivatives use and warrant further pharmacoepidemiologic studies to confirm these signals and investigate underlying mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":49000,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Benzimidazole derivatives are widely used anthelmintic drugs, particularly in mass campaigns for intestinal parasitosis treatment. Despite their generally good safety profile, serious adverse reactions have been reported. This study aims to identify potential pharmacovigilance signals for benzimidazole derivatives using disproportionality analysis in the WHO database.

Methodology: A case/non-case study was conducted using data from the WHO VigiBase database (2000-2023). Cases were individual case safety reports (ICSRs) where at least one suspected serious adverse event of interest was reported, while non-cases were ICSRs reporting any adverse events other than the serious adverse events of interest. Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess disproportionate reporting. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounding factors and a sensitivity analysis with imputed missing data was performed.

Principal findings: Among 19,068 serious reports analyzed, significant disproportionality signals were found for benzimidazole derivatives compared to other anthelmintic drugs, notably for bone marrow failure and hypoplastic anemia (adjusted ROR 9.44 [5.01-18.9]), serious leukopenia (3.89 [2.64-5.76]), serious hepatic disorders (3.10 [2.59-3.71]), hepatitis (2.88, 95% CI 2.29-3.63) and serious urticaria (2.02, 95% CI 1.36-2.99). We have also highlighted a new signal not mentioned in the summaries of product characteristics for seizures with benzimidazole derivatives. Secondary analysis revealed these signals were primarily reported with albendazole.

Conclusions/significance: This study identified potential pharmacovigilance signals for serious hematological and hepatic adverse events for benzimidazole derivatives, particularly albendazole. New signal for benzimidazole derivatives has been described for seizures. These findings underscore the need for vigilant monitoring during benzimidazole derivatives use and warrant further pharmacoepidemiologic studies to confirm these signals and investigate underlying mechanisms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苯并咪唑衍生物的严重不良事件报告:世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库的比例失调分析。
背景:苯并咪唑衍生物是广泛使用的驱虫药,特别是在大规模的肠道寄生虫病治疗中。尽管其安全性总体良好,但也有严重不良反应的报道。本研究旨在利用世卫组织数据库中的比例失调分析,确定苯并咪唑衍生物潜在的药物警戒信号:利用世界卫生组织 VigiBase 数据库(2000-2023 年)中的数据进行了病例/非病例研究。病例是指报告了至少一起疑似严重不良事件的个体病例安全报告(ICSR),而非病例是指报告了除严重不良事件以外的任何不良事件的个体病例安全报告。计算了报告比率 (ROR) 和 95% 置信区间,以评估报告比例失调的情况。根据潜在的混杂因素对分析进行了调整,并对缺失数据进行了敏感性分析:在所分析的 19,068 份严重报告中,发现苯并咪唑衍生物与其他抗蠕虫药物相比存在显著的比例失调信号,尤其是在骨髓衰竭和发育不全贫血方面(调整后 ROR 为 9.44 [5.01-18.9])、严重白细胞减少症(3.89 [2.64-5.76])、严重肝功能紊乱(3.10 [2.59-3.71])、肝炎(2.88,95% CI 2.29-3.63)和严重荨麻疹(2.02,95% CI 1.36-2.99)。我们还强调了产品特征概要中未提及的一个新信号,即苯并咪唑衍生物引起的癫痫发作。二次分析显示,这些信号主要出现在阿苯达唑中:本研究发现了苯并咪唑类衍生物(尤其是阿苯达唑)可能引发严重血液和肝脏不良事件的药物警戒信号。苯并咪唑衍生物的新信号是癫痫发作。这些发现强调了在使用苯并咪唑衍生物期间进行警惕性监测的必要性,因此有必要开展进一步的药物流行病学研究,以确认这些信号并调查其潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases PARASITOLOGY-TROPICAL MEDICINE
自引率
10.50%
发文量
723
期刊介绍: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy. The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability. All aspects of these diseases are considered, including: Pathogenesis Clinical features Pharmacology and treatment Diagnosis Epidemiology Vector biology Vaccinology and prevention Demographic, ecological and social determinants Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).
期刊最新文献
Oro-facial filariasis-A systematic review of the literature. Serious adverse events reported with benzimidazole derivatives: A disproportionality analysis from the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database. The effects of seasonal human mobility and Aedes aegypti habitat suitability on Zika virus epidemic severity in Colombia. Buruli ulcer surveillance in south-eastern Australian possums: Infection status, lesion mapping and internal distribution of Mycobacterium ulcerans. Development of an automated artificial intelligence-based system for urogenital schistosomiasis diagnosis using digital image analysis techniques and a robotized microscope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1