Exploring code portability solutions for HEP with a particle tracking test code.

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Frontiers in Big Data Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdata.2024.1485344
Hammad Ather, Sophie Berkman, Giuseppe Cerati, Matti J Kortelainen, Ka Hei Martin Kwok, Steven Lantz, Seyong Lee, Boyana Norris, Michael Reid, Allison Reinsvold Hall, Daniel Riley, Alexei Strelchenko, Cong Wang
{"title":"Exploring code portability solutions for HEP with a particle tracking test code.","authors":"Hammad Ather, Sophie Berkman, Giuseppe Cerati, Matti J Kortelainen, Ka Hei Martin Kwok, Steven Lantz, Seyong Lee, Boyana Norris, Michael Reid, Allison Reinsvold Hall, Daniel Riley, Alexei Strelchenko, Cong Wang","doi":"10.3389/fdata.2024.1485344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, high energy physics (HEP) experiments have relied on x86 CPUs for the majority of their significant computing needs. As the field looks ahead to the next generation of experiments such as DUNE and the High-Luminosity LHC, the computing demands are expected to increase dramatically. To cope with this increase, it will be necessary to take advantage of all available computing resources, including GPUs from different vendors. A broad landscape of code portability tools-including compiler pragma-based approaches, abstraction libraries, and other tools-allow the same source code to run efficiently on multiple architectures. In this paper, we use a test code taken from a HEP tracking algorithm to compare the performance and experience of implementing different portability solutions. While in several cases portable implementations perform close to the reference code version, we find that the performance varies significantly depending on the details of the implementation. Achieving optimal performance is not easy, even for relatively simple applications such as the test codes considered in this work. Several factors can affect the performance, such as the choice of the memory layout, the memory pinning strategy, and the compiler used. The compilers and tools are being actively developed, so future developments may be critical for their deployment in HEP experiments.</p>","PeriodicalId":52859,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Big Data","volume":"7 ","pages":"1485344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2024.1485344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, high energy physics (HEP) experiments have relied on x86 CPUs for the majority of their significant computing needs. As the field looks ahead to the next generation of experiments such as DUNE and the High-Luminosity LHC, the computing demands are expected to increase dramatically. To cope with this increase, it will be necessary to take advantage of all available computing resources, including GPUs from different vendors. A broad landscape of code portability tools-including compiler pragma-based approaches, abstraction libraries, and other tools-allow the same source code to run efficiently on multiple architectures. In this paper, we use a test code taken from a HEP tracking algorithm to compare the performance and experience of implementing different portability solutions. While in several cases portable implementations perform close to the reference code version, we find that the performance varies significantly depending on the details of the implementation. Achieving optimal performance is not easy, even for relatively simple applications such as the test codes considered in this work. Several factors can affect the performance, such as the choice of the memory layout, the memory pinning strategy, and the compiler used. The compilers and tools are being actively developed, so future developments may be critical for their deployment in HEP experiments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用粒子跟踪测试代码探索 HEP 代码可移植性解决方案。
传统上,高能物理(HEP)实验的大部分重要计算需求都依赖于 x86 CPU。随着该领域对下一代实验(如 DUNE 和高亮度 LHC)的展望,预计计算需求将急剧增加。为了应对这一增长,有必要利用所有可用的计算资源,包括来自不同供应商的 GPU。代码可移植性工具的广泛应用--包括基于编译器语法的方法、抽象库和其他工具--允许相同的源代码在多种体系结构上高效运行。在本文中,我们使用 HEP 跟踪算法的测试代码来比较不同可移植性解决方案的性能和实施经验。虽然在某些情况下,可移植实现的性能接近参考代码版本,但我们发现,性能因实现细节的不同而有很大差异。实现最佳性能并非易事,即使是相对简单的应用,如本研究中考虑的测试代码。有几个因素会影响性能,如内存布局的选择、内存引脚策略和所使用的编译器。编译器和工具正在积极开发中,因此未来的发展可能对其在 HEP 实验中的部署至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cybermycelium: a reference architecture for domain-driven distributed big data systems. Cognitive warfare: a conceptual analysis of the NATO ACT cognitive warfare exploratory concept. An enhanced whale optimization algorithm for task scheduling in edge computing environments. Promoting fairness in link prediction with graph enhancement. Exploring code portability solutions for HEP with a particle tracking test code.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1