Effects of Cognition-based and Affect-based Trust Attitudes on Trust Intentions.

IF 3.7 2区 心理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Business and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s10869-024-09986-z
Harjinder Gill, Emma Vreeker-Williamson, Leanne Son Hing, Scott A Cassidy, Kathleen Boies
{"title":"Effects of Cognition-based and Affect-based Trust Attitudes on Trust Intentions.","authors":"Harjinder Gill, Emma Vreeker-Williamson, Leanne Son Hing, Scott A Cassidy, Kathleen Boies","doi":"10.1007/s10869-024-09986-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite decades of research on trust in the workplace, researchers continue to struggle with fundamental questions regarding the conceptualization and measurement of organizational trust. To help clarify this construct, we revisit established trust definitions (Mayer et al. <i>Academy of Management Review, 20</i>(3), 709-734, Mayer et al., Academy of Management Review 20:709-734, 1995; Rousseau et al. <i>Academy of Management Review, 23</i>(3), 393-404, Rousseau et al., Academy of Management Review 23:393-404, 1998) and distinguish trust attitudes (i.e., positive expectations of others) from trust intentions (i.e., the willingness to be vulnerable). Using a three-study experimental design, we examined the causal effect of two distinct trust attitudes (i.e., cognition-based and affect-based) on two trust intentions (i.e., reliance and disclosure). We found that when cognition-based trust was high, participants were more willing to rely on a colleague (i.e., had higher reliance intentions). When affect-based trust was high, participants were more willing to share sensitive information with that colleague (i.e., higher disclosure intentions) and more willing to rely on a colleague (i.e., higher reliance intentions). We also examined the effect of mixed trust attitudes (i.e., feelings of low (vs. high) cognition-based trust paired with high (vs. low) affect-based trust). We found that, for reliance intentions, for the most part, high affect-based trust could be substituted with high cognition-based trust. Conversely, for disclosure intentions, high cognition-based trust could not substitute for high affect-based trust. The observed patterns indicate that affect-based and cognition-based attitudes are related yet distinct, with differential patterns of prediction with reliance and disclosure intentions. Our findings also underscore the importance of affect-based trust. By nurturing strong interpersonal bonds among employees, organizations can improve communication and collaboration, critical elements for organizational effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Psychology","volume":"39 6","pages":"1355-1374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09986-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite decades of research on trust in the workplace, researchers continue to struggle with fundamental questions regarding the conceptualization and measurement of organizational trust. To help clarify this construct, we revisit established trust definitions (Mayer et al. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734, Mayer et al., Academy of Management Review 20:709-734, 1995; Rousseau et al. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404, Rousseau et al., Academy of Management Review 23:393-404, 1998) and distinguish trust attitudes (i.e., positive expectations of others) from trust intentions (i.e., the willingness to be vulnerable). Using a three-study experimental design, we examined the causal effect of two distinct trust attitudes (i.e., cognition-based and affect-based) on two trust intentions (i.e., reliance and disclosure). We found that when cognition-based trust was high, participants were more willing to rely on a colleague (i.e., had higher reliance intentions). When affect-based trust was high, participants were more willing to share sensitive information with that colleague (i.e., higher disclosure intentions) and more willing to rely on a colleague (i.e., higher reliance intentions). We also examined the effect of mixed trust attitudes (i.e., feelings of low (vs. high) cognition-based trust paired with high (vs. low) affect-based trust). We found that, for reliance intentions, for the most part, high affect-based trust could be substituted with high cognition-based trust. Conversely, for disclosure intentions, high cognition-based trust could not substitute for high affect-based trust. The observed patterns indicate that affect-based and cognition-based attitudes are related yet distinct, with differential patterns of prediction with reliance and disclosure intentions. Our findings also underscore the importance of affect-based trust. By nurturing strong interpersonal bonds among employees, organizations can improve communication and collaboration, critical elements for organizational effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知型信任态度和情感型信任态度对信任意向的影响。
尽管对工作场所信任的研究已有数十年之久,但研究人员仍在为组织信任的概念化和测量方面的基本问题而苦苦挣扎。为了帮助澄清这一概念,我们重新审视了既定的信任定义(Mayer 等人,《管理评论学会》,20(3),709-734,Mayer 等人,《管理评论学会》,20:709-734,1995;Rousseau 等人,《管理评论学会》,23(3),393-404,Rousseau 等人,《管理评论学会》,23:393-404,1998),并将信任态度(即对他人的积极期望)与信任意图(即愿意受到伤害)区分开来。我们采用三项研究的实验设计,考察了两种不同的信任态度(即基于认知的信任态度和基于情感的信任态度)对两种信任意向(即依赖和披露)的因果效应。我们发现,当基于认知的信任度高时,参与者更愿意依赖同事(即依赖意愿更高)。当情感型信任度高时,参与者更愿意与同事分享敏感信息(即披露意愿更高),也更愿意依赖同事(即依赖意愿更高)。我们还研究了混合信任态度的影响(即基于认知的低信任感(与高信任感)与基于情感的高信任感(与低信任感))。我们发现,对于依赖意向而言,在大多数情况下,基于情感的高信任度可以被基于认知的高信任度所替代。相反,对于披露意图而言,高认知信任无法替代高情感信任。观察到的模式表明,基于情感的态度和基于认知的态度既有联系又有区别,对依赖意图和披露意图的预测模式也不同。我们的研究结果还强调了基于情感的信任的重要性。通过培养员工之间强有力的人际纽带,组织可以改善沟通与协作,这是提高组织效率的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business and Psychology (JBP) is an international outlet publishing high quality research designed to advance organizational science and practice. Since its inception in 1986, the journal has published impactful scholarship in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources Management, Work Psychology, Occupational Psychology, and Vocational Psychology. Typical subject matters include Team processes and effectiveness Customer service and satisfaction Employee recruitment, selection, and promotion Employee engagement and withdrawal Organizational culture and climate Training, development and coaching Mentoring and socialization Performance management, appraisal and feedback Workplace diversity Leadership Workplace health, stress, and safety Employee attitudes and satisfaction Careers and retirement Organizational communication Technology and work Employee motivation and job design Organizational change and development Employee citizenship and deviance Organizational effectiveness Work-nonwork/work-family Rigorous quantitative, qualitative, field-based, and lab-based empirical studies are welcome. Interdisciplinary scholarship is valued and encouraged. Submitted manuscripts should be well-grounded conceptually and make meaningful contributions to scientific understandingsand/or the advancement of science-based practice. The Journal of Business and Psychology is - A high quality/impactful outlet for organizational science research - A journal dedicated to bridging the science/practice divide - A journal striving to create interdisciplinary connections For details on submitting manuscripts, please read the author guidelines found in the far right menu.
期刊最新文献
Servant Leadership and Cooperation: The Moderating Role of Leader Group Prototypicality Here’s Looking at You: Does Eye Contact in Video Interviews Affect How Applicants are Perceived and Evaluated? Parent–Adolescent Transmission of Emotional Exhaustion: Testing a Social-Cognitive Spillover and Crossover Model The More Contextualized, the More Valid: Effects of Contextualization Strategies on Forced-choice Measurement The Relationship Between Team Diversity and Team Performance: Reconciling Promise and Reality Through a Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Registered Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1