[Hybrid diagnosis-related groups-The challenge].

Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1007/s00104-024-02196-6
Tobias Kisch, Ralf Müller-Rath, Sven Gregor, Ralph Lorenz, Axel Neumann, Stephan Dittrich, Michael Müller, Ralf Lippert, Jan Henniger, Burkhard Lembeck, Eva-Maria Baur, Jörg Karst, Frank Vescia, Ralf Schmitz
{"title":"[Hybrid diagnosis-related groups-The challenge].","authors":"Tobias Kisch, Ralf Müller-Rath, Sven Gregor, Ralph Lorenz, Axel Neumann, Stephan Dittrich, Michael Müller, Ralf Lippert, Jan Henniger, Burkhard Lembeck, Eva-Maria Baur, Jörg Karst, Frank Vescia, Ralf Schmitz","doi":"10.1007/s00104-024-02196-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The introduction of hybrid diagnosis-related groups (DRG) presents new challenges for healthcare providers and health insurances. The same applied in 2023 to the institute designated by the Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) to extract medical procedures and calculate remuneration levels for the first hybrid DRGs. A responsible calculation methodology and a realistic data basis are required as the result of the calculation can lead to controversy, even to a splitting among specialist groups and constructs. There is also the threat of mismanagement with subsequent supply problems. In this context, a loss of quality can occur due to the use of simple surgical procedures that are less complex and not expensive with respect to material costs and are economical but not state of the art and thus directly worsen the medical care of patients in the statutory health insurance (GKV). Furthermore, it is already becoming apparent that procedures that are uneconomical due to the miscalculation are partially no longer being comprehensively rendered by healthcare providers due to adjustment of the service portfolio. An appropriate compensation of procedures is only possible based on a remuneration that adequately covers the costs. In this respect, this article is not intended to be understood as a \"solution to the problem of the internal distribution of the remuneration in hybrid DRGs\" but more to offer suggestions for solutions for the required further development of the hybrid DRG compensation level calculation to prevent a threat to the treatment of GKV patients due to mismanagement. As required in § 115f of the Sozialgesetzbuch V (SGB V), the recalculation of an economic remuneration must be carried out urgently and promptly using an empirical calculation basis and methodology and this must be regularly adapted.</p>","PeriodicalId":72588,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"1007-1011"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-024-02196-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction of hybrid diagnosis-related groups (DRG) presents new challenges for healthcare providers and health insurances. The same applied in 2023 to the institute designated by the Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) to extract medical procedures and calculate remuneration levels for the first hybrid DRGs. A responsible calculation methodology and a realistic data basis are required as the result of the calculation can lead to controversy, even to a splitting among specialist groups and constructs. There is also the threat of mismanagement with subsequent supply problems. In this context, a loss of quality can occur due to the use of simple surgical procedures that are less complex and not expensive with respect to material costs and are economical but not state of the art and thus directly worsen the medical care of patients in the statutory health insurance (GKV). Furthermore, it is already becoming apparent that procedures that are uneconomical due to the miscalculation are partially no longer being comprehensively rendered by healthcare providers due to adjustment of the service portfolio. An appropriate compensation of procedures is only possible based on a remuneration that adequately covers the costs. In this respect, this article is not intended to be understood as a "solution to the problem of the internal distribution of the remuneration in hybrid DRGs" but more to offer suggestions for solutions for the required further development of the hybrid DRG compensation level calculation to prevent a threat to the treatment of GKV patients due to mismanagement. As required in § 115f of the Sozialgesetzbuch V (SGB V), the recalculation of an economic remuneration must be carried out urgently and promptly using an empirical calculation basis and methodology and this must be regularly adapted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[混合诊断相关小组--挑战]。
混合诊断相关分组(DRGs)的引入为医疗服务提供者和医疗保险机构带来了新的挑战。联邦卫生部(BMG)于 2023 年指定了一家机构,负责提取医疗程序并计算首批混合诊断相关分组的报酬水平。由于计算结果可能会引起争议,甚至导致专家小组和结构的分裂,因此需要一个负责任的计算方法和现实的数据基础。此外,还可能出现管理不善和随后的供应问题。在这种情况下,使用简单的外科手术可能会导致质量下降,因为这些手术并不复杂,在材料成本方面也不昂贵,虽然经济实惠,但并不先进,因此直接恶化了法定医疗保险(GKV)患者的医疗服务。此外,由于服务组合的调整,医疗服务提供者部分不再全面提供因计算错误而不经济的程序,这一点已经变得很明显。只有在报酬能够充分补偿成本的基础上,才有可能对手术进行适当补偿。在这方面,本文无意被理解为 "混合 DRGs 薪酬内部分配问题的解决方案",而更多的是为混合 DRGs 薪酬水平计算的进一步发展提供解决方案建议,以防止因管理不善而对 GKV 患者的治疗造成威胁。正如《社会法典第五编》(SGB V)第 115f 条所要求的,经济报酬的重新计算必须紧急、迅 速地使用经验计算基础和方法,并且必须定期进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Multimorbid patients in endocrine surgery]. [Prognostic influence of the operative technique on survival after esophagectomy and a delayed interval after chemoradiotherapy]. [Video-assisted thoracic surgery-Indications, importance and technique]. [Draining umbilicus in adulthood?] [Evidence for the extent and oncological benefit of lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1