Misinformation on first aid for seizures communicated through the fastest growing social media platform: A cross-sectional study of TikTok content

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110116
Alexei A. Birkun
{"title":"Misinformation on first aid for seizures communicated through the fastest growing social media platform: A cross-sectional study of TikTok content","authors":"Alexei A. Birkun","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Social media platforms have significant potential to enhance public knowledge on how to respond to generalised seizures. Among the platforms, TikTok emerges as a standout performer, demonstrating exceptional user engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the quality of content on first aid for seizures posted on TikTok.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>TikTok videos providing instructions on first aid for generalised seizures and having at least 100,000 views were analysed for completeness and correctness of the advice using a 21-item checklist. Any misleading recommendations suggesting inappropriate actions were collected from the videos and users’ comments on the videos.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen eligible videos had a total of 19,502,200 views. The videos frequently omitted key guidelines-concordant instructions on first aid for seizures, in particular, to lay the person down to prevent falling (missed in 84.2% of the videos), avoid moving the person unless they are in danger (89.5%), check the person’s breathing once the seizure has ended (89.5%) and commence cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the person remains unresponsive and not breathing normally (94.7%). Nine videos (47.4%) contained misleading instructions, most commonly to put the person on their side or otherwise move them during the seizure. Multiple comments to the videos advocated futile and dangerous actions, for instance, putting objects into the person’s mouth, restraining, or hitting the person.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>TikTok videos convey information on first aid for seizures to multi-million audiences concurrently propagating incomplete, inaccurate and potentially harmful non-evidence-based advice. Urgent research and regulatory efforts are needed to develop effective strategies to combat the misinformation spread.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024004980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Social media platforms have significant potential to enhance public knowledge on how to respond to generalised seizures. Among the platforms, TikTok emerges as a standout performer, demonstrating exceptional user engagement.

Study objective

This study aimed to assess the quality of content on first aid for seizures posted on TikTok.

Methods

TikTok videos providing instructions on first aid for generalised seizures and having at least 100,000 views were analysed for completeness and correctness of the advice using a 21-item checklist. Any misleading recommendations suggesting inappropriate actions were collected from the videos and users’ comments on the videos.

Results

Nineteen eligible videos had a total of 19,502,200 views. The videos frequently omitted key guidelines-concordant instructions on first aid for seizures, in particular, to lay the person down to prevent falling (missed in 84.2% of the videos), avoid moving the person unless they are in danger (89.5%), check the person’s breathing once the seizure has ended (89.5%) and commence cardiopulmonary resuscitation if the person remains unresponsive and not breathing normally (94.7%). Nine videos (47.4%) contained misleading instructions, most commonly to put the person on their side or otherwise move them during the seizure. Multiple comments to the videos advocated futile and dangerous actions, for instance, putting objects into the person’s mouth, restraining, or hitting the person.

Conclusion

TikTok videos convey information on first aid for seizures to multi-million audiences concurrently propagating incomplete, inaccurate and potentially harmful non-evidence-based advice. Urgent research and regulatory efforts are needed to develop effective strategies to combat the misinformation spread.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过增长最快的社交媒体平台传播有关癫痫发作急救的错误信息:对 TikTok 内容的横向研究
引言 社交媒体平台在提高公众对如何应对全身性癫痫发作的认识方面具有巨大潜力。本研究旨在评估在 TikTok 上发布的癫痫发作急救内容的质量。研究方法使用 21 项检查表分析了提供全身性癫痫发作急救指南且浏览量至少达到 100,000 次的 TikTok 视频,以确定建议的完整性和正确性。从视频和用户对视频的评论中收集了任何误导性建议,建议采取不恰当的行动。这些视频经常遗漏关键指南--关于癫痫发作急救的一致指示,特别是让患者躺下以防跌倒(84.2% 的视频遗漏了这一点)、除非患者处于危险中,否则避免移动患者(89.5%)、癫痫发作结束后检查患者的呼吸(89.5%)以及如果患者仍然没有反应且呼吸不正常,则开始心肺复苏(94.7%)。有九段视频(47.4%)包含误导性说明,最常见的是在癫痫发作期间让患者侧卧或以其他方式移动患者。视频的多条评论主张采取徒劳和危险的行动,例如将物品放入患者口中、限制或击打患者。亟需开展研究和监管工作,以制定有效的策略来打击错误信息的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1