How do urban green space attributes affect visitation and satisfaction? An empirical study based on multisource data

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105543
Jie Li , Jing Fu , Jun Gao , Rui Zhou , Zhenyu Zhao , Panpan Yang , Yang Yi
{"title":"How do urban green space attributes affect visitation and satisfaction? An empirical study based on multisource data","authors":"Jie Li ,&nbsp;Jing Fu ,&nbsp;Jun Gao ,&nbsp;Rui Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhenyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Panpan Yang ,&nbsp;Yang Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban green spaces (UGSs) are major settings of human–nature interaction and important to public well-being. Visitation and satisfaction are indicators that reflect the utilization degree of and feedback regarding UGSs. The focus of this study is to analyze the visitation and satisfaction characteristics of different types of UGSs, analyze the dominant factors affecting these indicators, and rank their importance to provide strategies for improving management. Here, 50 typical UGSs in Shanghai are selected. All-subset regression, hierarchical partitioning analysis and other methods are comprehensively used to explore the influencing factors. The results are as follows: 1) Comprehensive parks have the highest visitation rates, whereas community parks have the lowest visitation rates but the highest satisfaction rates. 2) UGS size has the greatest influence on visitation, followed by connectivity, building shape index, and edge density, with contributions of 69.35 %, 16.40 %, 8.50 %, and 5.75 %, respectively. 3) Transportation facility density and edge density have the greatest influences on satisfaction, with contributions of 51.49 % and 48.51 %, respectively. In this study, the applicability of using multisource data to analyze UGS attributes and their factors affecting visitation and satisfaction are demonstrated. Targeted strategies for constructing UGSs will help authorities plan and manage UGSs effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105543"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124007571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban green spaces (UGSs) are major settings of human–nature interaction and important to public well-being. Visitation and satisfaction are indicators that reflect the utilization degree of and feedback regarding UGSs. The focus of this study is to analyze the visitation and satisfaction characteristics of different types of UGSs, analyze the dominant factors affecting these indicators, and rank their importance to provide strategies for improving management. Here, 50 typical UGSs in Shanghai are selected. All-subset regression, hierarchical partitioning analysis and other methods are comprehensively used to explore the influencing factors. The results are as follows: 1) Comprehensive parks have the highest visitation rates, whereas community parks have the lowest visitation rates but the highest satisfaction rates. 2) UGS size has the greatest influence on visitation, followed by connectivity, building shape index, and edge density, with contributions of 69.35 %, 16.40 %, 8.50 %, and 5.75 %, respectively. 3) Transportation facility density and edge density have the greatest influences on satisfaction, with contributions of 51.49 % and 48.51 %, respectively. In this study, the applicability of using multisource data to analyze UGS attributes and their factors affecting visitation and satisfaction are demonstrated. Targeted strategies for constructing UGSs will help authorities plan and manage UGSs effectively.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市绿地属性如何影响游览率和满意度?基于多源数据的实证研究
城市绿地(UGS)是人与自然互动的主要场所,对公众福祉非常重要。访问量和满意度是反映城市绿地利用程度和反馈的指标。本研究的重点是分析不同类型城市绿地的游览率和满意度特征,分析影响这些指标的主导因素,并对其重要性进行排序,为改进管理提供策略。本研究选取了上海 50 家典型 UGS。综合运用全子集回归、层次划分分析等方法探讨影响因素。结果如下1)综合性公园的参观率最高,而社区公园的参观率最低,但满意度最高。2) UGS 规模对游览率的影响最大,其次是连通性、建筑形状指数和边缘密度,影响程度分别为 69.35 %、16.40 %、8.50 % 和 5.75 %。3) 交通设施密度和边缘密度对满意度的影响最大,贡献率分别为 51.49 % 和 48.51 %。本研究证明了使用多源数据分析 UGS 属性及其影响游客量和满意度的因素的适用性。有针对性地建设城市地质公园将有助于当局有效地规划和管理城市地质公园。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
Strategic emerging enterprises drive city-level carbon emission efficiency in China The spatial dynamics of financial expenditure on science and technology in Chinese cities: Financial capacity and government competition Development agendas governing the common good – Unfolding planning approaches: A case study of Vantaa, Finland Green infrastructure as a planning tool: A comprehensive systematization of urban redesign strategies to increase vegetation within public places Travel sustainability of new build housing in the London region: Can London's Green Belt be developed sustainably?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1