Assessing the state of infection prevention and control in cameroon: a cross-sectional workshop evaluation using socioecological models

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100408
{"title":"Assessing the state of infection prevention and control in cameroon: a cross-sectional workshop evaluation using socioecological models","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Infection prevention and control (IPC) contributes to the reduction of healthcare associated infections. Notwithstanding the global attention with available guidelines and tools, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) still struggle to put into place effective IPC programmes. Here, we use a socioecological approach to summarize the findings of a recent workshop on the implementation of IPC activities in Cameroon.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional study on the assessment of the IPC in Cameroon.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Experts and key stakeholders involved in IPC in Cameroon evaluated the implementation of infection prevention and control during a 4-day workshop. Detailed summaries of workshop discussions and recommendations were created. Data were clustered into themes guided by the WHO core component of IPC. Results were analyzed using the socioecological model of Bronfenbrenner, McLeroy and the theory of Grol and Wensing on successful implementation of practices in healthcare settings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cameroon does not have an effective IPC programme in place but has developed some areas of the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC core components across the guideline level, the individual level, the organizational level, and the political level.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cameroon is still far from the norms and standards laid out by the WHO. The evidence generated from the current analysis should contribute to improve policies and strategies towards an effective IPC programme in Cameroon and other LMICs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Infection prevention and control (IPC) contributes to the reduction of healthcare associated infections. Notwithstanding the global attention with available guidelines and tools, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) still struggle to put into place effective IPC programmes. Here, we use a socioecological approach to summarize the findings of a recent workshop on the implementation of IPC activities in Cameroon.

Study design

We conducted a cross-sectional study on the assessment of the IPC in Cameroon.

Methods

Experts and key stakeholders involved in IPC in Cameroon evaluated the implementation of infection prevention and control during a 4-day workshop. Detailed summaries of workshop discussions and recommendations were created. Data were clustered into themes guided by the WHO core component of IPC. Results were analyzed using the socioecological model of Bronfenbrenner, McLeroy and the theory of Grol and Wensing on successful implementation of practices in healthcare settings.

Results

Cameroon does not have an effective IPC programme in place but has developed some areas of the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC core components across the guideline level, the individual level, the organizational level, and the political level.

Conclusion

Cameroon is still far from the norms and standards laid out by the WHO. The evidence generated from the current analysis should contribute to improve policies and strategies towards an effective IPC programme in Cameroon and other LMICs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估喀麦隆的感染预防和控制状况:利用社会生态模型进行跨部门讲习班评估
感染预防与控制(IPC)有助于减少医疗相关感染。尽管全球都在关注现有的指南和工具,但中低收入国家(LMICs)仍在努力实施有效的 IPC 计划。在此,我们采用社会生态学的方法总结了最近在喀麦隆举办的关于实施 IPC 活动的研讨会的结果。研究设计我们对喀麦隆的 IPC 评估进行了横断面研究。编写了研讨会讨论和建议的详细摘要。在世界卫生组织 IPC 核心内容的指导下,对数据进行了主题分组。采用布朗芬布伦纳(Bronfenbrenner)、麦克勒罗伊(McLeroy)的社会生态模型以及格罗尔(Grol)和温辛格(Wensing)关于在医疗机构成功实施实践的理论对结果进行了分析。结果喀麦隆尚未制定有效的 IPC 计划,但已在指南层面、个人层面、组织层面和政治层面发展了世界卫生组织(WHO)IPC 核心组成部分的某些领域。当前分析得出的证据应有助于改进政策和战略,从而在喀麦隆和其他低收入和中等收入国家实施有效的 IPC 计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Low prevalence of borderline oxacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) in a tertiary care hospital in South Carolina Assessing the state of infection prevention and control in cameroon: a cross-sectional workshop evaluation using socioecological models ‘The Law of Unintended Consequences’ – Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection complicating peripheral intravascular cannulation in an epilepsy monitoring unit Susceptibility patterns of Candida species collected from intensive care units in Portugal: a prospective study in 2020–2022 Successful control of an outbreak of Panton–Valentine leucocidin positive meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a National Burns Unit through early detection by whole genome sequencing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1