A Cost Analysis of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Canadian Pre-Post Study

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CJC Open Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2024.07.016
Yousef N. Bolous MD , Prosper Koto PhD , John L. Sapp MD, FRCPC, FHRS , Chris Gray MD, FRCPC , David C. Lee MBChB , Nicolas Berbenetz MD, FRCPC , Amir AbdelWahab MBBCh , Ratika Parkash MD, MS, FRCPC
{"title":"A Cost Analysis of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Canadian Pre-Post Study","authors":"Yousef N. Bolous MD ,&nbsp;Prosper Koto PhD ,&nbsp;John L. Sapp MD, FRCPC, FHRS ,&nbsp;Chris Gray MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;David C. Lee MBChB ,&nbsp;Nicolas Berbenetz MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Amir AbdelWahab MBBCh ,&nbsp;Ratika Parkash MD, MS, FRCPC","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.07.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is a paucity of Canadian studies using patient-level data to analyze the costs of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to identify the health care resource use, costs, and cost predictors of CA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cost analysis was performed in a population of AF patients treated with CA in Central Zone Nova Scotia from 2010 to 2018. Costs were compared 2 years before ablation (pre-CA) with costs 2 years after (post-CA); the 3-month period post-CA was defined as the treatment window. Costs were also compared according to CA technology defined as before 2015 for patients treated with non-contact force sensing CA and after 2015 for patients treated with contact force sensing CA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Heart failure hospitalizations, AF-related emergency department visits, acute inpatient admissions, and cardioversions all decreased after ablation. The cost difference post-CA vs pre-CA was CAD$18,869 (95% confidence interval [CI], $15,570-$22,168). This increase in costs was driven by costs incurred during the treatment window, which was $21,439 (95% CI, $20,468-$22,409). After excluding treatment window costs, the mean year 1 post-CA cost was $11,223 (95% CI, $9113-$13,334) and year 2 post-CA cost was $4555 (95% CI, $3145-$5965); both were lower than the pre-CA costs. Costs remained stable over the time frame of the study period, with no influence from new technologies on cost. The post-CA cost difference between the post-2015 and pre-2015 groups was $2573 (95% CI, -$2336 to $7481).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We showed that although CA is expensive, it might be a cost-effective treatment modality for AF because of the associated reduction in costs and health care resource use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"6 11","pages":"Pages 1372-1378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24003226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is a paucity of Canadian studies using patient-level data to analyze the costs of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to identify the health care resource use, costs, and cost predictors of CA.

Methods

A cost analysis was performed in a population of AF patients treated with CA in Central Zone Nova Scotia from 2010 to 2018. Costs were compared 2 years before ablation (pre-CA) with costs 2 years after (post-CA); the 3-month period post-CA was defined as the treatment window. Costs were also compared according to CA technology defined as before 2015 for patients treated with non-contact force sensing CA and after 2015 for patients treated with contact force sensing CA.

Results

Heart failure hospitalizations, AF-related emergency department visits, acute inpatient admissions, and cardioversions all decreased after ablation. The cost difference post-CA vs pre-CA was CAD$18,869 (95% confidence interval [CI], $15,570-$22,168). This increase in costs was driven by costs incurred during the treatment window, which was $21,439 (95% CI, $20,468-$22,409). After excluding treatment window costs, the mean year 1 post-CA cost was $11,223 (95% CI, $9113-$13,334) and year 2 post-CA cost was $4555 (95% CI, $3145-$5965); both were lower than the pre-CA costs. Costs remained stable over the time frame of the study period, with no influence from new technologies on cost. The post-CA cost difference between the post-2015 and pre-2015 groups was $2573 (95% CI, -$2336 to $7481).

Conclusions

We showed that although CA is expensive, it might be a cost-effective treatment modality for AF because of the associated reduction in costs and health care resource use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导管消融治疗心房颤动的成本分析:一项加拿大事后研究
背景加拿大很少有研究使用患者层面的数据来分析心房颤动(AF)导管消融术(CA)的成本。我们试图确定 CA 的医疗资源使用、成本和成本预测因素。方法对 2010 年至 2018 年新斯科舍省中部地区接受 CA 治疗的房颤患者进行了成本分析。对消融前 2 年(消融前)的成本与消融后 2 年(消融后)的成本进行了比较;消融后 3 个月被定义为治疗窗口期。此外,还根据CA技术对费用进行了比较,对于采用非接触式力传感CA治疗的患者,CA技术定义为2015年之前;对于采用接触式力传感CA治疗的患者,CA技术定义为2015年之后。消融术后与消融术前的成本差异为 18,869 加元(95% 置信区间 [CI],15,570-22,168 加元)。费用增加的原因是治疗窗口期产生的费用,为 21,439 加元(95% 置信区间:20,468-22,409 加元)。剔除治疗窗口期的费用后,CA 后第一年的平均费用为 11223 美元(95% CI,9113-13334 美元),CA 后第二年的平均费用为 4555 美元(95% CI,3145-5965 美元);这两项费用均低于 CA 前的费用。在研究期间,成本保持稳定,新技术对成本没有影响。2015 年后组与 2015 年前组之间的 CA 后成本差异为 2573 美元(95% CI,-2336 美元至 7481 美元)。结论我们的研究表明,虽然 CA 费用昂贵,但它可能是一种具有成本效益的房颤治疗方式,因为它能降低相关成本和医疗资源的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
First-in-Human Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Trial with Tricaprin (F-HAAAT): Study Design and Protocol Inflammatory Mediators in Pericardial Fluid in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Implications of Inaccurate Blood Pressure Measurement on Hypertension Prevalence Femoral Vein Pulsatility and Neurocognitive Disorder in Cardiac Surgery Comparing ECG Lead Subsets for Heart Arrhythmia/ECG Pattern Classification: Convolutional Neural Networks and Random Forest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1