Effect of inspiratory oxygen fraction during driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy on pulmonary complications following open abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial
Yu-Tong Zhang , Yang Han , Hui-Jia Zhuang , Ai-Min Feng , Liang Jin , Xue-Fei Li , Hong Yu , Hai Yu
{"title":"Effect of inspiratory oxygen fraction during driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy on pulmonary complications following open abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Yu-Tong Zhang , Yang Han , Hui-Jia Zhuang , Ai-Min Feng , Liang Jin , Xue-Fei Li , Hong Yu , Hai Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of 30 % fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO<sub>2</sub>) compared with 80 % FIO<sub>2</sub> in the context of driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy on pulmonary complications following open abdominal surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Tertiary university hospital in China.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>514 adult patients, ASA I-III and scheduled for major open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 30 % or 80 % FIO<sub>2</sub> during the intraoperative period. All patients received driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy, including low tidal volume and individualized PEEP set at lowest driving pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of pulmonary complications within the 7 days postoperatively. The severity of pulmonary complications, extrapulmonary complications, and other secondary outcomes were also assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>Of 1553 patients assessed for eligibility, 514 patients were randomly assigned and analyzed with intention-to-treat principle. Patients receiving 30 % FIO<sub>2</sub> had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) compared to those receiving 80 % FIO<sub>2</sub> (46.3 %<em>vs.</em> 64.6 %; RR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.61–0.84; <em>P</em> < 0.001). The severity score of PPCs was significantly reduced in the 30 % FIO<sub>2</sub> group compared with that in the 80 % FIO<sub>2</sub> group within the 7 postoperative days (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Dynamic compliance was significantly greater in 30 % FIO<sub>2</sub> group at the end of surgery (56 [48–66] <em>vs.</em> 53 [46–62], <em>P</em> = 0.027). More patients in the 80 % FIO<sub>2</sub> group developed oxygen desaturation (SpO<sub>2</sub> < 94 %) on air intake during PACU stay (18.5 %<em>vs.</em> 30.4 %; RR, 0.61; 95 % CI, 0.44–0.84; <em>P</em> = 0.002; 30 % FIO<sub>2</sub> group <em>vs.</em>80 % FIO<sub>2</sub> group).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients undergoing open abdominal surgery, using a 30 % FIO<sub>2</sub>, compared with 80 % FIO<sub>2</sub>, in context of driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy, intraoperatively reduced the incidence and severity of pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 111676"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024003052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objective
The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of 30 % fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) compared with 80 % FIO2 in the context of driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy on pulmonary complications following open abdominal surgery.
Design
A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Setting
Tertiary university hospital in China.
Patients
514 adult patients, ASA I-III and scheduled for major open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.
Interventions
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 30 % or 80 % FIO2 during the intraoperative period. All patients received driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy, including low tidal volume and individualized PEEP set at lowest driving pressure.
Measurements
The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of pulmonary complications within the 7 days postoperatively. The severity of pulmonary complications, extrapulmonary complications, and other secondary outcomes were also assessed.
Main results
Of 1553 patients assessed for eligibility, 514 patients were randomly assigned and analyzed with intention-to-treat principle. Patients receiving 30 % FIO2 had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) compared to those receiving 80 % FIO2 (46.3 %vs. 64.6 %; RR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.61–0.84; P < 0.001). The severity score of PPCs was significantly reduced in the 30 % FIO2 group compared with that in the 80 % FIO2 group within the 7 postoperative days (P < 0.001). Dynamic compliance was significantly greater in 30 % FIO2 group at the end of surgery (56 [48–66] vs. 53 [46–62], P = 0.027). More patients in the 80 % FIO2 group developed oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 94 %) on air intake during PACU stay (18.5 %vs. 30.4 %; RR, 0.61; 95 % CI, 0.44–0.84; P = 0.002; 30 % FIO2 group vs.80 % FIO2 group).
Conclusions
In patients undergoing open abdominal surgery, using a 30 % FIO2, compared with 80 % FIO2, in context of driving pressure-guided ventilation strategy, intraoperatively reduced the incidence and severity of pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.