Emily Deignan , Amatulraheem Alabassi , Scott Brandon , Marcello Papini , Mark Hurtig , Mark Towler
{"title":"Partial coverage adhesive augmented sternal fixation and stabilization: A biomechanical analysis","authors":"Emily Deignan , Amatulraheem Alabassi , Scott Brandon , Marcello Papini , Mark Hurtig , Mark Towler","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adhesive-augmented sternal fixation (AASF) has been investigated as an alternative to the clinical standard of cerclage wires; however, previous studies have focused on a full adhesive layer across the sternal midline, which acts as a barrier to bone healing. This study used a human cadaveric model to investigate if partial coverage AASF used in combination with wired fixation could provide adequate stability. Median sternotomies were performed on fifteen human cadaveric sterna. Three groups (n = 5) with varying adhesive coverage (50 %, 62.5 %, 75 %) of the sternal midline and traditional wiring were investigated. Cyclic lateral distraction loading of 10 N to 100 N was applied at 50 N/s. Every 30 cycles, the maximum load was increased by 100 N to a maximum of 500 N. Displacement was measured using transducers spanning the transection line at the manubrium, body, and xiphoid. Mean maximum total displacement (MMTD) for all groups was significantly below 2 mm (p < 0.001) with 1.49 mm ± 0.82 mm, 0.97 mm ± 0. 55 mm, and 0.67 mm ± 0.65 mm in the 50 %, 62.5 %, and 75 % groups respectively. MMTD in the 50 % group was significantly greater than MMTD in the 62.5 % and 75 % groups. AASF improved stability as coverage of the sternal surface with adhesive increased. Partial coverage of the sternal midline with adhesive may provide similar rigidity to a full layer while enabling earlier sternal ossification at the transection line compared to wiring alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 112374"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adhesive-augmented sternal fixation (AASF) has been investigated as an alternative to the clinical standard of cerclage wires; however, previous studies have focused on a full adhesive layer across the sternal midline, which acts as a barrier to bone healing. This study used a human cadaveric model to investigate if partial coverage AASF used in combination with wired fixation could provide adequate stability. Median sternotomies were performed on fifteen human cadaveric sterna. Three groups (n = 5) with varying adhesive coverage (50 %, 62.5 %, 75 %) of the sternal midline and traditional wiring were investigated. Cyclic lateral distraction loading of 10 N to 100 N was applied at 50 N/s. Every 30 cycles, the maximum load was increased by 100 N to a maximum of 500 N. Displacement was measured using transducers spanning the transection line at the manubrium, body, and xiphoid. Mean maximum total displacement (MMTD) for all groups was significantly below 2 mm (p < 0.001) with 1.49 mm ± 0.82 mm, 0.97 mm ± 0. 55 mm, and 0.67 mm ± 0.65 mm in the 50 %, 62.5 %, and 75 % groups respectively. MMTD in the 50 % group was significantly greater than MMTD in the 62.5 % and 75 % groups. AASF improved stability as coverage of the sternal surface with adhesive increased. Partial coverage of the sternal midline with adhesive may provide similar rigidity to a full layer while enabling earlier sternal ossification at the transection line compared to wiring alone.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.