Evaluating the effect of an individualised reward-related impulsivity induction on ad libitum alcohol consumption: A pilot study

Hannah J. Lindsay , Daniel Stjepanović , Matthew J. Gullo
{"title":"Evaluating the effect of an individualised reward-related impulsivity induction on ad libitum alcohol consumption: A pilot study","authors":"Hannah J. Lindsay ,&nbsp;Daniel Stjepanović ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Gullo","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Impulsivity has well-documented associations with risky alcohol use. Little evidence exists on the causal mechanisms, but emerging experimental evidence suggests a role for reward-related impulsivity. Recent work experimentally increased reward-related impulsivity to increase drinking using standardised reward-cue stimuli. The present study piloted participant-generated reward-cue stimuli to increase laboratory alcohol consumption. Sixteen participants (56.3 % male; <em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 20.13, <em>SD</em> = 1.78) attended two laboratory sessions (experimental and control). In the experimental session, the <em>Individualised Reward-seeking Induction Schedule (IRIS)</em> had participants re-experience an intense, vivid memory of an approach motivational state (control session: no induction) before completing a laboratory drinking task. Self-reported reward-seeking, positive, and negative affect were measured. <em>IRIS</em> significantly increased alcohol consumption by 53.65<!--> <!-->ml (<em>SE</em> = 29.11, <em>p</em> &lt;.001) when controlling for positive and negative affect. <em>IRIS</em> also produced significantly higher state reward-seeking (Δꭓ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 14.02, <em>p</em> &lt;.001). Findings provide preliminary validation of <em>IRIS</em>, a new experimental methodology to investigate impulsivity-related alcohol use. Replication of observed effects in a larger sample is required. The present study supports the use of <em>IRIS</em> in future research to understand the causal role of reward-related impulsivity on alcohol consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impulsivity has well-documented associations with risky alcohol use. Little evidence exists on the causal mechanisms, but emerging experimental evidence suggests a role for reward-related impulsivity. Recent work experimentally increased reward-related impulsivity to increase drinking using standardised reward-cue stimuli. The present study piloted participant-generated reward-cue stimuli to increase laboratory alcohol consumption. Sixteen participants (56.3 % male; Mage = 20.13, SD = 1.78) attended two laboratory sessions (experimental and control). In the experimental session, the Individualised Reward-seeking Induction Schedule (IRIS) had participants re-experience an intense, vivid memory of an approach motivational state (control session: no induction) before completing a laboratory drinking task. Self-reported reward-seeking, positive, and negative affect were measured. IRIS significantly increased alcohol consumption by 53.65 ml (SE = 29.11, p <.001) when controlling for positive and negative affect. IRIS also produced significantly higher state reward-seeking (Δꭓ2 (1) = 14.02, p <.001). Findings provide preliminary validation of IRIS, a new experimental methodology to investigate impulsivity-related alcohol use. Replication of observed effects in a larger sample is required. The present study supports the use of IRIS in future research to understand the causal role of reward-related impulsivity on alcohol consumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估个性化奖励相关冲动诱导对自由饮酒的影响:试点研究
冲动与酗酒风险之间的关系已得到充分证实。有关其因果机制的证据很少,但新出现的实验证据表明,与奖赏相关的冲动性在其中发挥了作用。最近的研究利用标准化的奖赏线索刺激,通过实验提高了与奖赏相关的冲动性,从而增加了饮酒量。本研究试行了由参与者生成奖赏线索刺激来增加实验室饮酒量。16名参与者(56.3%为男性;平均年龄=20.13岁,平均标准偏差=1.78)参加了两个实验环节(实验环节和对照环节)。在实验环节,个体化寻求奖赏诱导表(IRIS)让参与者在完成实验室饮酒任务之前,重新体验对接近动机状态的强烈而生动的记忆(对照环节:无诱导)。对自我报告的寻求奖赏、积极和消极情绪进行了测量。在控制积极和消极情绪的情况下,IRIS 使饮酒量明显增加了 53.65 毫升(SE = 29.11,p <.001)。IRIS 还明显提高了寻求奖赏的状态(Δꭓ2 (1) = 14.02, p <.001)。研究结果为 IRIS 提供了初步验证,IRIS 是一种新的实验方法,用于研究与冲动有关的酒精使用。需要在更大的样本中重复观察到的效果。本研究支持在未来的研究中使用 IRIS 来了解与奖赏相关的冲动对酒精消费的因果作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
期刊最新文献
Cannabidiol prescribing in the United States: An analysis of real-world data Discovering opioid slang on social media: A Word2Vec approach with reddit data Large decrease in syringe distribution following the introduction of fentanyl in King County, Washington A systematic review of the reasons for quitting and/or reducing alcohol among those who have received alcohol use disorder treatment The power of lived experience in optimizing US policymakers’ engagement with substance use research: A series of rapid-cycle randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1