A Semi-Quantitative Approach to Nontarget Compositional Analysis of Complex Samples

IF 6.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00819
Rhianna L. Evans, Daniel J. Bryant, Aristeidis Voliotis, Dawei Hu, HuiHui Wu, Sara Aisyah Syafira, Osayomwanbor E. Oghama, Gordon McFiggans, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Andrew R. Rickard
{"title":"A Semi-Quantitative Approach to Nontarget Compositional Analysis of Complex Samples","authors":"Rhianna L. Evans, Daniel J. Bryant, Aristeidis Voliotis, Dawei Hu, HuiHui Wu, Sara Aisyah Syafira, Osayomwanbor E. Oghama, Gordon McFiggans, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Andrew R. Rickard","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nontarget analysis (NTA) by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry improves the capacity to comprehend the molecular composition of complex mixtures compared to targeted analysis techniques. However, the detection of unknown compounds means that quantification in NTA is challenging. This study proposes a new semi-quantitative methodology for use in the NTA of organic aerosol. Quantification of unknowns is achieved using the average ionization efficiency of multiple quantification standards which elute within the same retention time window as the unknown analytes. In total, 110 authentic standards constructed 25 retention time windows for the quantification of oxygenated (CHO) and organonitrogen (CHON) species. The method was validated on extracts of biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) and compared to quantification with authentic standards and had an average prediction error of 1.52 times. Furthermore, 70% of concentrations were estimated within a factor of 2 (prediction errors between 0.5 and 2 times) from the authentic standard quantification. The semi-quantification method also showed good agreement for the quantification of CHO compounds compared to predictive ionization efficiency-based methods, whereas for CHON species, the prediction error of the semi-quantification method (1.63) was significantly lower than the predictive ionization efficiency approach (14.94). Application to BBOA for the derivation of relative abundances of CHO and CHON species showed that using peak area underestimated the relative abundance of CHO by 19% and overestimated that of CHON by 11% compared to the semi-quantification method. These differences could lead to significant misinterpretations of source apportionment in complex samples, highlighting the need to account for ionization differences in NTA approaches.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00819","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nontarget analysis (NTA) by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry improves the capacity to comprehend the molecular composition of complex mixtures compared to targeted analysis techniques. However, the detection of unknown compounds means that quantification in NTA is challenging. This study proposes a new semi-quantitative methodology for use in the NTA of organic aerosol. Quantification of unknowns is achieved using the average ionization efficiency of multiple quantification standards which elute within the same retention time window as the unknown analytes. In total, 110 authentic standards constructed 25 retention time windows for the quantification of oxygenated (CHO) and organonitrogen (CHON) species. The method was validated on extracts of biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) and compared to quantification with authentic standards and had an average prediction error of 1.52 times. Furthermore, 70% of concentrations were estimated within a factor of 2 (prediction errors between 0.5 and 2 times) from the authentic standard quantification. The semi-quantification method also showed good agreement for the quantification of CHO compounds compared to predictive ionization efficiency-based methods, whereas for CHON species, the prediction error of the semi-quantification method (1.63) was significantly lower than the predictive ionization efficiency approach (14.94). Application to BBOA for the derivation of relative abundances of CHO and CHON species showed that using peak area underestimated the relative abundance of CHO by 19% and overestimated that of CHON by 11% compared to the semi-quantification method. These differences could lead to significant misinterpretations of source apportionment in complex samples, highlighting the need to account for ionization differences in NTA approaches.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂样本非目标成分分析的半定量方法
与靶向分析技术相比,通过液相色谱-高分辨质谱联用技术进行的非靶向分析(NTA)提高了理解复杂混合物分子组成的能力。然而,未知化合物的检测意味着在 NTA 中进行定量具有挑战性。本研究提出了一种用于有机气溶胶 NTA 的半定量新方法。利用与未知分析物在同一保留时间窗口内洗脱的多个定量标准物质的平均电离效率来实现未知分析物的定量。共有 110 个真实标准品构建了 25 个保留时间窗,用于定量含氧(CHO)和有机氮(CHON)物种。该方法在生物质燃烧有机气溶胶(BBOA)提取物上进行了验证,并与使用真实标准物进行的定量进行了比较,其平均预测误差为 1.52 倍。此外,70%的浓度估算值与真实标准定量值的误差在 2 倍以内(预测误差在 0.5 到 2 倍之间)。与基于预测电离效率的方法相比,半定量方法在定量 CHO 化合物方面也显示出良好的一致性,而对于 CHON 物种,半定量方法的预测误差(1.63)明显低于预测电离效率方法(14.94)。应用 BBOA 方法推导 CHO 和 CHON 物种的相对丰度表明,与半定量法相比,使用峰面积法低估了 CHO 的相对丰度 19%,高估了 CHON 的相对丰度 11%。这些差异可能会导致对复杂样品中的来源分配产生重大误解,从而突出了在 NTA 方法中考虑电离差异的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
期刊最新文献
Disruption Dynamics and Charge Transfer of a Single Attoliter Emulsion Droplet Revealed by Combined Fast-Scan Sinusoidal Voltammetry and Short Time Fourier Transform Analysis. A Rapid and Simplified Approach to Correct Atmospheric Absorptions in Infrared Spectra. Early Diagnosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on Dual microRNA Detection Using a Well-Defined DNA Crown-Carbon Dots Structure as an Electrochemiluminescence Sensing Platform. End-To-End Automated Intact Protein Mass Spectrometry for High-Throughput Screening and Characterization of Bispecific and Multispecific Antibodies. Highly Sensitive Determination of Copper Ions as MnO2 Etching Inhibitor in Single-Particle Nanoplasmonic Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1