Rhianna L. Evans, Daniel J. Bryant, Aristeidis Voliotis, Dawei Hu, HuiHui Wu, Sara Aisyah Syafira, Osayomwanbor E. Oghama, Gordon McFiggans, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Andrew R. Rickard
{"title":"A Semi-Quantitative Approach to Nontarget Compositional Analysis of Complex Samples","authors":"Rhianna L. Evans, Daniel J. Bryant, Aristeidis Voliotis, Dawei Hu, HuiHui Wu, Sara Aisyah Syafira, Osayomwanbor E. Oghama, Gordon McFiggans, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Andrew R. Rickard","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nontarget analysis (NTA) by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry improves the capacity to comprehend the molecular composition of complex mixtures compared to targeted analysis techniques. However, the detection of unknown compounds means that quantification in NTA is challenging. This study proposes a new semi-quantitative methodology for use in the NTA of organic aerosol. Quantification of unknowns is achieved using the average ionization efficiency of multiple quantification standards which elute within the same retention time window as the unknown analytes. In total, 110 authentic standards constructed 25 retention time windows for the quantification of oxygenated (CHO) and organonitrogen (CHON) species. The method was validated on extracts of biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) and compared to quantification with authentic standards and had an average prediction error of 1.52 times. Furthermore, 70% of concentrations were estimated within a factor of 2 (prediction errors between 0.5 and 2 times) from the authentic standard quantification. The semi-quantification method also showed good agreement for the quantification of CHO compounds compared to predictive ionization efficiency-based methods, whereas for CHON species, the prediction error of the semi-quantification method (1.63) was significantly lower than the predictive ionization efficiency approach (14.94). Application to BBOA for the derivation of relative abundances of CHO and CHON species showed that using peak area underestimated the relative abundance of CHO by 19% and overestimated that of CHON by 11% compared to the semi-quantification method. These differences could lead to significant misinterpretations of source apportionment in complex samples, highlighting the need to account for ionization differences in NTA approaches.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00819","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nontarget analysis (NTA) by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry improves the capacity to comprehend the molecular composition of complex mixtures compared to targeted analysis techniques. However, the detection of unknown compounds means that quantification in NTA is challenging. This study proposes a new semi-quantitative methodology for use in the NTA of organic aerosol. Quantification of unknowns is achieved using the average ionization efficiency of multiple quantification standards which elute within the same retention time window as the unknown analytes. In total, 110 authentic standards constructed 25 retention time windows for the quantification of oxygenated (CHO) and organonitrogen (CHON) species. The method was validated on extracts of biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) and compared to quantification with authentic standards and had an average prediction error of 1.52 times. Furthermore, 70% of concentrations were estimated within a factor of 2 (prediction errors between 0.5 and 2 times) from the authentic standard quantification. The semi-quantification method also showed good agreement for the quantification of CHO compounds compared to predictive ionization efficiency-based methods, whereas for CHON species, the prediction error of the semi-quantification method (1.63) was significantly lower than the predictive ionization efficiency approach (14.94). Application to BBOA for the derivation of relative abundances of CHO and CHON species showed that using peak area underestimated the relative abundance of CHO by 19% and overestimated that of CHON by 11% compared to the semi-quantification method. These differences could lead to significant misinterpretations of source apportionment in complex samples, highlighting the need to account for ionization differences in NTA approaches.
期刊介绍:
Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.