A new method for global ionospheric real-time modeling integrating ionospheric VTEC short-term forecast results

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geodesy Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1007/s00190-024-01911-9
Peng Chen, Rong Wang, Yibin Yao, Mingzhu Xiong, Yuchen Zhang, Xinyue Yang
{"title":"A new method for global ionospheric real-time modeling integrating ionospheric VTEC short-term forecast results","authors":"Peng Chen, Rong Wang, Yibin Yao, Mingzhu Xiong, Yuchen Zhang, Xinyue Yang","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01911-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As an important data source for monitoring the behavior and variations of the ionosphere, the accuracy of current real-time global ionospheric maps (RT-GIMs) in low-latitude regions and oceanic regions is usually poor, and the accuracy during geomagnetic storms is not ideal. Therefore, the ionospheric vertical total electron content (VTEC) short-term forecast results were integrated into the global ionospheric real-time modeling process to improve the accuracy of RT-GIMs. Firstly, the preliminary RT-GIMs were established by constructing a virtual grid and determining the number of ionospheric pierce points in the grid. Then, different strategies were used to determine the virtual VTEC observations and filled the preliminary RT-GIMs. Finally, the filled RT-GIMs were modeled using spherical harmonic expansion and generated the final RT-GIMs, XRTG. On this basis, three ways were selected to evaluate the accuracy of XRTG. The GPS dSTEC (differential slant total electron content) assessment results showed that the performance of XRTG was the closest to that of Centre for Orbit Determination in Europe’s final GIMs (CODG), and it outperformed other RT-GIMs during geomagnetic storm periods and low-latitude regions. Compared with Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya’s RT-GIMs (UADG) with better performance in other RT-GIMs, the maximum decrease in root mean square error (RMSE) of XRTG during the geomagnetic storm period exceeds 25%, and the maximum decrease in the overall average RMSE of the 20 stations in low latitudes exceeds 27%. The Jason-3 VTEC assessment results showed that the accuracy of XRTG was closer to that of UADG and CODG, and the performance of XRTG and UADG in the range of 22° N–22° S was significantly better than that of other RT-GIMs. The consistency between XRTG and Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya’s rapid GIMs, Chinese Academy of Sciences’ final GIMs, and CODG was good, and the VTEC deviations from each post-processing GIMs were mainly concentrated in the range of ± 5 TECU.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01911-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an important data source for monitoring the behavior and variations of the ionosphere, the accuracy of current real-time global ionospheric maps (RT-GIMs) in low-latitude regions and oceanic regions is usually poor, and the accuracy during geomagnetic storms is not ideal. Therefore, the ionospheric vertical total electron content (VTEC) short-term forecast results were integrated into the global ionospheric real-time modeling process to improve the accuracy of RT-GIMs. Firstly, the preliminary RT-GIMs were established by constructing a virtual grid and determining the number of ionospheric pierce points in the grid. Then, different strategies were used to determine the virtual VTEC observations and filled the preliminary RT-GIMs. Finally, the filled RT-GIMs were modeled using spherical harmonic expansion and generated the final RT-GIMs, XRTG. On this basis, three ways were selected to evaluate the accuracy of XRTG. The GPS dSTEC (differential slant total electron content) assessment results showed that the performance of XRTG was the closest to that of Centre for Orbit Determination in Europe’s final GIMs (CODG), and it outperformed other RT-GIMs during geomagnetic storm periods and low-latitude regions. Compared with Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya’s RT-GIMs (UADG) with better performance in other RT-GIMs, the maximum decrease in root mean square error (RMSE) of XRTG during the geomagnetic storm period exceeds 25%, and the maximum decrease in the overall average RMSE of the 20 stations in low latitudes exceeds 27%. The Jason-3 VTEC assessment results showed that the accuracy of XRTG was closer to that of UADG and CODG, and the performance of XRTG and UADG in the range of 22° N–22° S was significantly better than that of other RT-GIMs. The consistency between XRTG and Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya’s rapid GIMs, Chinese Academy of Sciences’ final GIMs, and CODG was good, and the VTEC deviations from each post-processing GIMs were mainly concentrated in the range of ± 5 TECU.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合电离层 VTEC 短期预报结果的全球电离层实时建模新方法
作为监测电离层行为和变化的重要数据源,目前低纬度地区和海洋地区的全球电离层实时地图(RT-GIMs)的精度通常较差,地磁暴期间的精度也不理想。因此,将电离层垂直电子总含量(VTEC)短期预报结果纳入全球电离层实时建模过程,以提高 RT-GIMs 的精度。首先,通过构建虚拟网格和确定网格中电离层穿透点的数量来建立初步的 RT-GIM。然后,使用不同的策略确定虚拟 VTEC 观测数据并填充初步 RT-GIM。最后,利用球谐波展开对填充的 RT-GIMs 进行建模,生成最终的 RT-GIMs XRTG。在此基础上,选择了三种方法来评估 XRTG 的精度。全球定位系统 dSTEC(差分斜面总电子含量)评估结果表明,XRTG 的性能最接近欧洲轨道确定中心(CODG)的最终 GIMs,在地磁暴期间和低纬度地区的性能优于其他 RT-GIMs。与加泰罗尼亚理工大学的 RT-GIMs(UADG)相比,XRTG 在地磁暴期间的均方根误差(RMSE)最大降幅超过 25%,低纬度地区 20 个站点的总体平均均方根误差最大降幅超过 27%。Jason-3 VTEC 评估结果表明,XRTG 的精度与 UADG 和 CODG 比较接近,XRTG 和 UADG 在北纬 22°-南纬 22°范围内的性能明显优于其他 RT-GIMs 。XRTG 与加泰罗尼亚理工大学的快速 GIMs、中国科学院的最终 GIMs 和 CODG 的一致性较好,与各后处理 GIMs 的 VTEC 偏差主要集中在 ± 5 TECU 范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
期刊最新文献
Modified Bayesian method for simultaneously imaging fault geometry and slip distribution with reduced uncertainty, applied to 2017 Mw 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake Global 3D ionospheric shape function modeling with kriging Spherical radial basis functions model: approximating an integral functional of an isotropic Gaussian random field Capture of coseismic velocity waveform using GNSS raw Doppler and carrier phase data for enhancing shaking intensity estimation Derivation of the Sagnac (Earth-rotation) correction and analysis of its accuracy for GNSS applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1