Ultra-high-capacity band and space division multiplexing backbone EONs: multi-core versus multi-fiber

IF 4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE Journal of Optical Communications and Networking Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1364/JOCN.533086
Farhad Arpanaei;Mahdi Ranjbar Zefreh;Carlos Natalino;Piotr Lechowicz;Shuangyi Yan;Jose M. Rivas-Moscoso;Oscar Gonzalez de Dios;Juan Pedro Fernandez-Palacios;Hami Rabbani;Maite Brandt-Pearce;Alfonso Sanchez-Macian;Jose Alberto Hernandez;David Larrabeiti;Paolo Monti
{"title":"Ultra-high-capacity band and space division multiplexing backbone EONs: multi-core versus multi-fiber","authors":"Farhad Arpanaei;Mahdi Ranjbar Zefreh;Carlos Natalino;Piotr Lechowicz;Shuangyi Yan;Jose M. Rivas-Moscoso;Oscar Gonzalez de Dios;Juan Pedro Fernandez-Palacios;Hami Rabbani;Maite Brandt-Pearce;Alfonso Sanchez-Macian;Jose Alberto Hernandez;David Larrabeiti;Paolo Monti","doi":"10.1364/JOCN.533086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both multi-band and space division multiplexing (SDM) independently represent cost-effective approaches for next-generation optical backbone networks, particularly as data exchange between core data centers reaches the petabit-per-second scale. This paper focuses on different strategies for implementing band and SDM elastic optical network (BSDM EON) technology and analyzes the total network capacity of three sizes of backbone metro-core networks: ultra-long-, long-, and medium-distance networks related to the United States, Japan, and Spain, respectively. Two BSDM strategies are considered, namely, multi-core fibers (MCFs) and BSDM based on standard single-mode fiber (SSMF) bundles of multi-fiber pairs (BuMFPs). For MCF-based BSDM, we evaluated the performance of four manufactured trench-assisted weakly coupled (TAWC) MCFs with 4, 7, 13, and 19 cores. Simulation results reveal that, in the regime of ultra-low (UL) loss and inter-core crosstalk (ICXT), MCF-based throughput can be up to 14% higher than SSMF BuMFP-based BSDM when the core pitch exceeds 43 µm and the loss coefficient is lower than that of standard single-mode fibers. However, increasing the number of cores with (non-)standard cladding diameters, UL loss, and ICXT coefficient is not beneficial. As core counts increase up to 13 for non-standard cladding diameters (\n<tex>${\\lt}230\\;{\\unicode{x00B5}{\\rm m}}$</tex>\n), the core pitch and loss coefficient also increase, leading to degraded performance of MCF-based BSDM compared to SSMF BuMFP-based BSDM. The results indicate that, in scenarios with 19 MFPs, SSFM BuMFP-based BSDM outperforms 19-core MCF-based scenarios, increasing the throughput by 55% to 73%, from medium-backbone networks to ultra-long ones.","PeriodicalId":50103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optical Communications and Networking","volume":"16 12","pages":"H66-H78"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optical Communications and Networking","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10746252/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both multi-band and space division multiplexing (SDM) independently represent cost-effective approaches for next-generation optical backbone networks, particularly as data exchange between core data centers reaches the petabit-per-second scale. This paper focuses on different strategies for implementing band and SDM elastic optical network (BSDM EON) technology and analyzes the total network capacity of three sizes of backbone metro-core networks: ultra-long-, long-, and medium-distance networks related to the United States, Japan, and Spain, respectively. Two BSDM strategies are considered, namely, multi-core fibers (MCFs) and BSDM based on standard single-mode fiber (SSMF) bundles of multi-fiber pairs (BuMFPs). For MCF-based BSDM, we evaluated the performance of four manufactured trench-assisted weakly coupled (TAWC) MCFs with 4, 7, 13, and 19 cores. Simulation results reveal that, in the regime of ultra-low (UL) loss and inter-core crosstalk (ICXT), MCF-based throughput can be up to 14% higher than SSMF BuMFP-based BSDM when the core pitch exceeds 43 µm and the loss coefficient is lower than that of standard single-mode fibers. However, increasing the number of cores with (non-)standard cladding diameters, UL loss, and ICXT coefficient is not beneficial. As core counts increase up to 13 for non-standard cladding diameters ( ${\lt}230\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$ ), the core pitch and loss coefficient also increase, leading to degraded performance of MCF-based BSDM compared to SSMF BuMFP-based BSDM. The results indicate that, in scenarios with 19 MFPs, SSFM BuMFP-based BSDM outperforms 19-core MCF-based scenarios, increasing the throughput by 55% to 73%, from medium-backbone networks to ultra-long ones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超大容量频带和空分复用主干 EON:多核与多光纤
多频段和空分复用(SDM)都是下一代光骨干网的经济有效的独立方法,尤其是当核心数据中心之间的数据交换达到每秒千万比特级别时。本文重点讨论了实施频带和 SDM 弹性光网络(BSDM EON)技术的不同策略,并分析了三种规模的骨干城域核心网络的总网络容量:分别与美国、日本和西班牙相关的超长距、长距和中距网络。考虑了两种 BSDM 策略,即多芯光纤(MCF)和基于标准单模光纤(SSMF)的多光纤对束(BuMFP)BSDM。对于基于 MCF 的 BSDM,我们评估了四种制造的沟槽辅助弱耦合(TAWC)MCF 的性能,它们分别有 4 芯、7 芯、13 芯和 19 芯。仿真结果表明,在超低(UL)损耗和纤芯间串扰(ICXT)情况下,当纤芯间距超过 43 µm 且损耗系数低于标准单模光纤时,基于 MCF 的吞吐量最多可比基于 SSMF BuMFP 的 BSDM 高 14%。然而,增加具有(非)标准包层直径、UL 损耗和 ICXT 系数的纤芯数量并无益处。当非标准包层直径(${unicode{x00B5}{rm m}}$)的纤芯数增加到 13 个时,纤芯间距和损耗系数也会增加,从而导致基于 MCF 的 BSDM 性能比基于 SSMF BuMFP 的 BSDM 性能下降。结果表明,在有 19 个 MFP 的情况下,基于 SSFM BuMFP 的 BSDM 优于基于 19 核 MCF 的情况,从中型骨干网络到超长网络,吞吐量提高了 55% 到 73%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
16.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The scope of the Journal includes advances in the state-of-the-art of optical networking science, technology, and engineering. Both theoretical contributions (including new techniques, concepts, analyses, and economic studies) and practical contributions (including optical networking experiments, prototypes, and new applications) are encouraged. Subareas of interest include the architecture and design of optical networks, optical network survivability and security, software-defined optical networking, elastic optical networks, data and control plane advances, network management related innovation, and optical access networks. Enabling technologies and their applications are suitable topics only if the results are shown to directly impact optical networking beyond simple point-to-point networks.
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the Benchmarking in Optical Networks Special Issue Protocol-aware approach for mitigating radiation-induced errors in free-space optical downlinks Security enhancement for NOMA-PON with 2D cellular automata and Turing pattern cascading scramble aided fixed-point extended logistic chaotic encryption In-network stable radix sorter using many FPGAs with high-bandwidth photonics [Invited] Power-consumption analysis for different IPoWDM network architectures with ZR/ZR+ and long-haul muxponders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1