Unpacking the association between social media use and support for unlawful behaviors in protests: a study in Hong Kong

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Internet Research Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1108/intr-01-2024-0070
Chuanli Xia, Fei Shen
{"title":"Unpacking the association between social media use and support for unlawful behaviors in protests: a study in Hong Kong","authors":"Chuanli Xia, Fei Shen","doi":"10.1108/intr-01-2024-0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Existing research has shown the role of social media in facilitating general protest participation. However, there is a noticeable gap in understanding the dynamics related to explicitly unlawful behaviors during protests, which have become increasingly prominent in recent times. Drawing upon the communication mediation model (O-S-O-R model), this study proposes a moderated mediation model to delineate specific mechanisms under which social media use influences individuals' support for unlawful behaviors in protests.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A survey of 1,121 Hong Kong residents was conducted in the context of the 2019 Hong Kong Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement to test the theoretical model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Obtaining political information on social media has a dual effect on support for unlawful behaviors in protests. On one hand, social media use increases individuals' political knowledge, which is reinforced by frequent political discussions on social media. This enhanced political knowledge tends to reduce the likelihood of supporting unlawful behaviors in protests. On the other hand, acquiring political information on social media can also generate increased anger toward politics, potentially leading to a more supportive attitude toward unlawful behaviors in protests.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study contributes to the expanding field of research on digital activism by revealing the intricate mechanisms by which social media usage shapes support for unlawful behaviors in protests. It also expands our understanding of explicit unlawful behaviors within protests as a distinct form of political behavior.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-01-2024-0070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Existing research has shown the role of social media in facilitating general protest participation. However, there is a noticeable gap in understanding the dynamics related to explicitly unlawful behaviors during protests, which have become increasingly prominent in recent times. Drawing upon the communication mediation model (O-S-O-R model), this study proposes a moderated mediation model to delineate specific mechanisms under which social media use influences individuals' support for unlawful behaviors in protests.

Design/methodology/approach

A survey of 1,121 Hong Kong residents was conducted in the context of the 2019 Hong Kong Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement to test the theoretical model.

Findings

Obtaining political information on social media has a dual effect on support for unlawful behaviors in protests. On one hand, social media use increases individuals' political knowledge, which is reinforced by frequent political discussions on social media. This enhanced political knowledge tends to reduce the likelihood of supporting unlawful behaviors in protests. On the other hand, acquiring political information on social media can also generate increased anger toward politics, potentially leading to a more supportive attitude toward unlawful behaviors in protests.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the expanding field of research on digital activism by revealing the intricate mechanisms by which social media usage shapes support for unlawful behaviors in protests. It also expands our understanding of explicit unlawful behaviors within protests as a distinct form of political behavior.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读社交媒体的使用与支持抗议活动中的非法行为之间的关联:一项在香港进行的研究
目的现有研究表明,社交媒体在促进人们普遍参与抗议活动方面发挥了作用。然而,对于近来日益突出的抗议活动中明确的非法行为的动态了解还存在明显差距。本研究借鉴传播中介模型(O-S-O-R模型),提出了一个调节中介模型,以阐明社交媒体的使用影响个人支持抗议活动中的非法行为的具体机制。研究结果在2019年香港《反引渡法修正案》运动的背景下,对1121名香港居民进行了调查,以检验理论模型。一方面,社交媒体的使用增加了个人的政治知识,而社交媒体上频繁的政治讨论又强化了个人的政治知识。政治知识的增加往往会降低支持抗议中非法行为的可能性。另一方面,在社交媒体上获取政治信息也会增加对政治的愤怒,从而有可能导致对抗议活动中的非法行为持更支持的态度。 原创性/价值 本研究揭示了社交媒体的使用对抗议活动中非法行为的支持所形成的复杂机制,为不断扩大的数字激进主义研究领域做出了贡献。它还拓展了我们对抗议活动中明确的非法行为这一独特政治行为形式的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Research
Internet Research 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This wide-ranging interdisciplinary journal looks at the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the internet. Recent issues have focused on online and mobile gaming, the sharing economy, and the dark side of social media.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the influence of communication visibility in preventing knowledge sabotage: a knowledge power perspective Value co-creation in live streaming through tourism scenes: a contextual marketing perspective The OPAD-perception framework: measuring perceptions of online personalized advertising Unpacking the association between social media use and support for unlawful behaviors in protests: a study in Hong Kong Corporate social and digital responsibility in esports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1