Bilateral mastectomy may not reduce mortality risk

IF 503.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.3322/caac.21869
Mike Fillon
{"title":"Bilateral mastectomy may not reduce mortality risk","authors":"Mike Fillon","doi":"10.3322/caac.21869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n<blockquote><p>“While it’s been known for some time in the surgical literature that bilateral mastectomy does not impact mortality, this study more clearly confirms that through large sample sizes, length of prospective follow-up, and thoughtful subgroup analysis.”</p><p>—Monique Gary, DO</p>\n<div></div>\n</blockquote>\n</div>\n<p>Although rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and bilateral mastectomy are increasing among women with unilateral sporadic breast cancer, a new study reports that despite the procedure diminishing the risk of contralateral breast cancer, the patients experienced mortality rates similar to those of patients treated with lumpectomy or unilateral mastectomy.</p>\n<p>The primary goal of the study, appearing in <i>JAMA Oncology</i> (doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2212), was to determine the 20-year cumulative risk of breast cancer mortality among women with stage 0–III unilateral breast cancer divided by each patient’s initial surgical procedures.</p>\n<p>In an editorial accompanying the study, Seema A. Khan, MD, Bluhm Family Professor of Cancer Research at the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois, and Masha Kocherginsky, PhD, professor of biostatistics and director of the Quantitative Data Sciences Core at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern Medicine, wrote that although contralateral breast cancer is the most frequent second malignant tumor among women who have experienced a diagnosis of primary breast cancer, it is less frequent and less ominous than recurrence of the initial cancer. “Nevertheless,” they wrote, “for many patients with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer, it can be a prominent source of worry as they navigate their treatment decisions. This worry is accentuated among young patients and those with early-stage disease.”</p>","PeriodicalId":137,"journal":{"name":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":503.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21869","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“While it’s been known for some time in the surgical literature that bilateral mastectomy does not impact mortality, this study more clearly confirms that through large sample sizes, length of prospective follow-up, and thoughtful subgroup analysis.”

—Monique Gary, DO

Although rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and bilateral mastectomy are increasing among women with unilateral sporadic breast cancer, a new study reports that despite the procedure diminishing the risk of contralateral breast cancer, the patients experienced mortality rates similar to those of patients treated with lumpectomy or unilateral mastectomy.

The primary goal of the study, appearing in JAMA Oncology (doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2212), was to determine the 20-year cumulative risk of breast cancer mortality among women with stage 0–III unilateral breast cancer divided by each patient’s initial surgical procedures.

In an editorial accompanying the study, Seema A. Khan, MD, Bluhm Family Professor of Cancer Research at the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois, and Masha Kocherginsky, PhD, professor of biostatistics and director of the Quantitative Data Sciences Core at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern Medicine, wrote that although contralateral breast cancer is the most frequent second malignant tumor among women who have experienced a diagnosis of primary breast cancer, it is less frequent and less ominous than recurrence of the initial cancer. “Nevertheless,” they wrote, “for many patients with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer, it can be a prominent source of worry as they navigate their treatment decisions. This worry is accentuated among young patients and those with early-stage disease.”

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双侧乳房切除术可能不会降低死亡风险
"虽然外科文献中早已知道双侧乳房切除术不会影响死亡率,但这项研究通过大样本量、长时间的前瞻性随访和周到的亚组分析,更清楚地证实了这一点。"尽管在单侧散发性乳腺癌女性患者中,对侧预防性乳房切除术和双侧乳房切除术的比例正在增加,但一项新的研究报告称,尽管手术降低了对侧乳腺癌的风险,但患者的死亡率与接受肿块切除术或单侧乳房切除术的患者相似。伊利诺伊州芝加哥市西北大学范伯格医学院布卢姆家族癌症研究教授、医学博士 Seema A. Khan 和罗伯特-H-卢里综合癌症中心生物统计学教授、定量数据科学核心主任 Masha Kocherginsky 博士在随研究发表的一篇社论中指出:"乳腺癌是一种常见的恶性肿瘤。Lurie 综合癌症中心主任 Masha Kocherginsky 博士写道,虽然对侧乳腺癌是确诊为原发性乳腺癌的妇女中最常见的第二种恶性肿瘤,但与原发性癌症复发相比,对侧乳腺癌的发病率较低,也不那么可怕。"尽管如此,"他们写道,"对于许多新确诊的单侧乳腺癌患者来说,这可能是她们在做出治疗决定时最担心的问题。这种担忧在年轻患者和早期患者中更为突出"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
873.20
自引率
0.10%
发文量
51
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians" has been published by the American Cancer Society since 1950, making it one of the oldest peer-reviewed journals in oncology. It maintains the highest impact factor among all ISI-ranked journals. The journal effectively reaches a broad and diverse audience of health professionals, offering a unique platform to disseminate information on cancer prevention, early detection, various treatment modalities, palliative care, advocacy matters, quality-of-life topics, and more. As the premier journal of the American Cancer Society, it publishes mission-driven content that significantly influences patient care.
期刊最新文献
Bilateral mastectomy may not reduce mortality risk Most young female cancer survivors are at minimal risk for obstetric problems Breast cancer statistics 2024. Breast cancer: The good, the bad, and an important call to effective risk reduction strategies. Reviewer acknowledgement 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1