Discharge Current Optimization of Multiphase Pulsed Alternator Based on Excitation Compensation

IF 1.3 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1109/TPS.2024.3460473
Wenchao Li;Yingjie Chen;Rongyao Fu;Ping Yan;Youlong Wang;Yaohong Sun
{"title":"Discharge Current Optimization of Multiphase Pulsed Alternator Based on Excitation Compensation","authors":"Wenchao Li;Yingjie Chen;Rongyao Fu;Ping Yan;Youlong Wang;Yaohong Sun","doi":"10.1109/TPS.2024.3460473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A pulsed alternator (PA) is an important pulse power source capable of driving many types of loads. For electromagnetic rail launcher load, the ideal driving current is a flat top wave. However, the discharge current of the PA will decline, resulting in the inability to maintain a flat top during pulse discharge. Therefore, an optimization method of discharge current based on excitation compensation is proposed and compared it with the traditional method of adjusting the trigger angle (ATA) in this article. First, the relationship between field current and discharge current is analyzed theoretically, and the optimization method is verified. Second, three optimization methods: ATA, separate-excitation compensation (SEC1), and self-excitation compensation (SEC2) were compared. Then, a comparative analysis was conducted on the optimization strategies for the combination of multimethods. Finally, the PA inductance parameters were extracted by using the finite element method (FEM), and the FEM and circuit coupling simulation and the circuit simulation were compared to verify the accuracy of the circuit model and the superiority of the optimization strategies. The results show that all three optimization methods have obvious merits and demerits. The optimization strategies can balance the merits and demerits of a single method and obtain great benefits at small costs. Especially the ATA + SEC2 and ATA + SEC1+ SEC2 optimization strategies are the most prominent. The former does not require external energy compared to the latter, at the cost of a slightly higher field current peak; the latter can achieve the recovery of residual energy in the rails for excitation compensation in the next pulse discharge, at the cost of requiring a set of devices for the residual energy recovery in the rails.","PeriodicalId":450,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science","volume":"52 8","pages":"3201-3211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10702376/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A pulsed alternator (PA) is an important pulse power source capable of driving many types of loads. For electromagnetic rail launcher load, the ideal driving current is a flat top wave. However, the discharge current of the PA will decline, resulting in the inability to maintain a flat top during pulse discharge. Therefore, an optimization method of discharge current based on excitation compensation is proposed and compared it with the traditional method of adjusting the trigger angle (ATA) in this article. First, the relationship between field current and discharge current is analyzed theoretically, and the optimization method is verified. Second, three optimization methods: ATA, separate-excitation compensation (SEC1), and self-excitation compensation (SEC2) were compared. Then, a comparative analysis was conducted on the optimization strategies for the combination of multimethods. Finally, the PA inductance parameters were extracted by using the finite element method (FEM), and the FEM and circuit coupling simulation and the circuit simulation were compared to verify the accuracy of the circuit model and the superiority of the optimization strategies. The results show that all three optimization methods have obvious merits and demerits. The optimization strategies can balance the merits and demerits of a single method and obtain great benefits at small costs. Especially the ATA + SEC2 and ATA + SEC1+ SEC2 optimization strategies are the most prominent. The former does not require external energy compared to the latter, at the cost of a slightly higher field current peak; the latter can achieve the recovery of residual energy in the rails for excitation compensation in the next pulse discharge, at the cost of requiring a set of devices for the residual energy recovery in the rails.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于激励补偿的多相脉冲交流发电机放电电流优化
脉冲交流发电机(PA)是一种重要的脉冲电源,能够驱动多种负载。对于电磁轨道发射器负载,理想的驱动电流是平顶波。然而,脉冲交流发电机的放电电流会下降,导致在脉冲放电过程中无法保持平顶波。因此,本文提出了一种基于激励补偿的放电电流优化方法,并与传统的调整触发角(ATA)方法进行了比较。首先,从理论上分析了场电流和放电电流之间的关系,并验证了优化方法。第二,三种优化方法:ATA、分离励磁补偿(SEC1)和自励磁补偿(SEC2)三种优化方法进行了比较。然后,对多种方法组合的优化策略进行了比较分析。最后,使用有限元法(FEM)提取了功率放大器的电感参数,并将有限元法和电路耦合仿真与电路仿真进行了比较,以验证电路模型的准确性和优化策略的优越性。结果表明,三种优化方法都有明显的优缺点。优化策略可以平衡单一方法的优缺点,以较小的代价获得较大的收益。其中尤以 ATA + SEC2 和 ATA + SEC1+ SEC2 优化策略最为突出。与后者相比,前者不需要外部能量,但代价是场电流峰值略高;后者可以实现轨道残余能量的回收,用于下一次脉冲放电时的励磁补偿,但代价是需要一套用于轨道残余能量回收的装置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 物理-物理:流体与等离子体
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
538
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: The scope covers all aspects of the theory and application of plasma science. It includes the following areas: magnetohydrodynamics; thermionics and plasma diodes; basic plasma phenomena; gaseous electronics; microwave/plasma interaction; electron, ion, and plasma sources; space plasmas; intense electron and ion beams; laser-plasma interactions; plasma diagnostics; plasma chemistry and processing; solid-state plasmas; plasma heating; plasma for controlled fusion research; high energy density plasmas; industrial/commercial applications of plasma physics; plasma waves and instabilities; and high power microwave and submillimeter wave generation.
期刊最新文献
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science Publication Information Table of Contents IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science Information for Authors Blank Page IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science Information for Authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1