{"title":"Exploring structural variances in monatomic metallic glasses using machine learning and molecular dynamics simulation","authors":"Chengqiao Yang, Minhua Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00894-024-06204-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>BCC and FCC metals have different glass-forming abilities (GFA) and exhibit different characteristics during the glass transition. However, the structural origin of their different GFAs is still not clear. Here, we explored the structures of eight monatomic metallic glasses by combining molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and machine learning (ML). Our findings reveal that, despite their common long-range disordered atomic structure, metallic glasses can be further classified into two distinct categories indicating an underlying structural order within the disorder. Using machine learning, we found that BCC liquids can sample more diverse glass states than FCC liquids. Furthermore, glasses formed from BCC metals (GFFBs) exhibit a higher degree of disorder than glasses formed from FCC metals (GFFFs). These findings highlight the inherent differences between GFFFs and GFFBs, which help explain the different glass-forming abilities of FCC and BCC metals. Additionally, our results demonstrate the promising potential of computer vision and ML methods in exploring material structures.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>Classical molecular dynamics simulations were employed to generate configurations of GFFBs and GFFFs, and the simulations were performed using the LAMMPS code. Inter-atomic interactions were described using a classical embedded atom model (EAM) potential. The initial configuration of the model consists of 32,000 atoms in a three-dimensional (3D) cubic box with periodic boundary conditions applied in all three directions. For machine learning, we utilized an unsupervised machine learning method along with MobileNetV2 for classifying glass structures. Image entropy and image distances were used to measure the structural differences of the metallic glasses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00894-024-06204-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
BCC and FCC metals have different glass-forming abilities (GFA) and exhibit different characteristics during the glass transition. However, the structural origin of their different GFAs is still not clear. Here, we explored the structures of eight monatomic metallic glasses by combining molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and machine learning (ML). Our findings reveal that, despite their common long-range disordered atomic structure, metallic glasses can be further classified into two distinct categories indicating an underlying structural order within the disorder. Using machine learning, we found that BCC liquids can sample more diverse glass states than FCC liquids. Furthermore, glasses formed from BCC metals (GFFBs) exhibit a higher degree of disorder than glasses formed from FCC metals (GFFFs). These findings highlight the inherent differences between GFFFs and GFFBs, which help explain the different glass-forming abilities of FCC and BCC metals. Additionally, our results demonstrate the promising potential of computer vision and ML methods in exploring material structures.
Method
Classical molecular dynamics simulations were employed to generate configurations of GFFBs and GFFFs, and the simulations were performed using the LAMMPS code. Inter-atomic interactions were described using a classical embedded atom model (EAM) potential. The initial configuration of the model consists of 32,000 atoms in a three-dimensional (3D) cubic box with periodic boundary conditions applied in all three directions. For machine learning, we utilized an unsupervised machine learning method along with MobileNetV2 for classifying glass structures. Image entropy and image distances were used to measure the structural differences of the metallic glasses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Modeling focuses on "hardcore" modeling, publishing high-quality research and reports. Founded in 1995 as a purely electronic journal, it has adapted its format to include a full-color print edition, and adjusted its aims and scope fit the fast-changing field of molecular modeling, with a particular focus on three-dimensional modeling.
Today, the journal covers all aspects of molecular modeling including life science modeling; materials modeling; new methods; and computational chemistry.
Topics include computer-aided molecular design; rational drug design, de novo ligand design, receptor modeling and docking; cheminformatics, data analysis, visualization and mining; computational medicinal chemistry; homology modeling; simulation of peptides, DNA and other biopolymers; quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and ADME-modeling; modeling of biological reaction mechanisms; and combined experimental and computational studies in which calculations play a major role.