Influence of opening shape, size and position on the ultimate strength, stiffness and energy dissipation of confined brick masonry walls

Abstract

Confined brick masonry structures have garnered considerable attention as an effective solution for earthquake-prone regions due to their robust construction, efficient wall-to-column connections, and optimised utilisation of material strength. Within the realm of building design and construction, openings play a pivotal role, serving as essential elements for facilitating natural light and fresh air into the structure. However, the presence of openings within confined brick masonry walls causes a significant reduction in their seismic resistance. Hence, striking the right balance between these openings and structural strength is crucial. For this purpose, it is necessary to investigate the influence of size, shape, and position of the openings in confined brick masonry walls on their seismic performance. In this work, a comprehensive finite element macro-model is adopted that treats the wall and tie members as a unified system. A concrete damage plasticity approach is employed to predict damage progression in confined brick masonry walls. Using a pushover analysis in finite element framework, the ultimate strength, stiffness, and energy absorption capacity of confined brick masonry with different types of openings is assessed. Furthermore, a parametric study is conducted incorporating various scenarios, such as aspect ratios of confined brick masonry walls, diverse shapes of opening and variations in the positions of windows, doors, and combinations of both openings. Based on the results, simplified equations are developed to facilitate analytical estimation of ultimate strength, along with recommendations for optimising opening shape, size, and placement to enhance the design of confined brick masonry walls with openings. The study highlights that larger openings in confined brick masonry walls diminish ultimate strength, stiffness, and energy dissipation due to reduced load distribution and increased stress concentrations. Openings smaller than 10% of the masonry area maintain load paths, but larger openings require additional support. Rectangular openings with greater height than width exhibit superior performance. Furthermore, the positioning of windows significantly influences wall strength, with placements farther from the loading point proving favorable. Door placement also impacts ultimate strength, with central placement compromising stiffness. Combining window openings with a centrally located door maintains consistent ultimate strength but affects stiffness. Overall, this research contributes to a better understanding of the seismic behaviour of confined brick masonry structures with openings, offering valuable insights for engineers and architects working in regions susceptible to seismic activity.