{"title":"Binding energy referencing in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy","authors":"Grzegorz Greczynski, Lars Hultman","doi":"10.1038/s41578-024-00743-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Binding energy (<i>B</i><sub><i>E</i></sub>) referencing is critical to the reliability of chemical analysis performed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Although the procedure is straightforward for metallic samples, no universal solution is available for insulators, wherein a build-up of positive charge during photoemission results in an uncontrolled change in the <i>B</i><sub><i>E</i></sub> of the core-level peaks. As these peaks are used to assess the chemical bonding, shifts caused by charging lead to problems with spectra interpretation and contribute to an unacceptably large spread in the <i>B</i><sub><i>E</i></sub> values reported for the same chemical state. It is often unclear which referencing methods should be applied to which sample type and which referencing approaches should be rejected. In this Perspective, we review essential concepts and key experiments related to <i>B</i><sub><i>E</i></sub> referencing. We discuss energy diagrams and appropriate reference levels for conducting and insulating samples with and without electrical contact with the spectrometer, and we define criteria for the ultimate charge-reference method, using them to evaluate common referencing techniques. Although no method is free of issues, the most popular one, based on the adventitious carbon (AdC), turns out to be the least reliable. In particular, because the vacuum level aligns at the AdC–sample interface, the <i>B</i><sub><i>E</i></sub> of the reference C 1<i>s</i> peak from AdC is not constant but varies with the sample work function. To rectify the situation, we suggest easy-to-do control experiments that refute the notion that the C 1<i>s</i> peak has constant <i>B</i><sub><i>E</i></sub>. We further use the framework of energy diagrams to explain the consequences of the vacuum level alignment at the AdC–sample interface for measurements performed in the most common experimental configurations. Finally, we suggest ideas for improving the reliability of chemical analysis to stimulate the development of new referencing standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":19081,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":79.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-024-00743-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Binding energy (BE) referencing is critical to the reliability of chemical analysis performed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Although the procedure is straightforward for metallic samples, no universal solution is available for insulators, wherein a build-up of positive charge during photoemission results in an uncontrolled change in the BE of the core-level peaks. As these peaks are used to assess the chemical bonding, shifts caused by charging lead to problems with spectra interpretation and contribute to an unacceptably large spread in the BE values reported for the same chemical state. It is often unclear which referencing methods should be applied to which sample type and which referencing approaches should be rejected. In this Perspective, we review essential concepts and key experiments related to BE referencing. We discuss energy diagrams and appropriate reference levels for conducting and insulating samples with and without electrical contact with the spectrometer, and we define criteria for the ultimate charge-reference method, using them to evaluate common referencing techniques. Although no method is free of issues, the most popular one, based on the adventitious carbon (AdC), turns out to be the least reliable. In particular, because the vacuum level aligns at the AdC–sample interface, the BE of the reference C 1s peak from AdC is not constant but varies with the sample work function. To rectify the situation, we suggest easy-to-do control experiments that refute the notion that the C 1s peak has constant BE. We further use the framework of energy diagrams to explain the consequences of the vacuum level alignment at the AdC–sample interface for measurements performed in the most common experimental configurations. Finally, we suggest ideas for improving the reliability of chemical analysis to stimulate the development of new referencing standards.
结合能(BE)参照对于利用 X 射线光电子能谱进行化学分析的可靠性至关重要。虽然这一过程对于金属样品来说非常简单,但对于绝缘体来说却没有通用的解决方案,因为在光辐射过程中,正电荷的积累会导致核级峰的结合能发生不受控制的变化。由于这些峰值是用来评估化学键的,因此由电荷引起的偏移会导致光谱解释问题,并造成同一化学态所报告的 BE 值出现不可接受的巨大差异。通常不清楚哪种参比方法应适用于哪种样品类型,哪些参比方法应予以摒弃。在本视角中,我们回顾了与 BE 参考相关的基本概念和关键实验。我们讨论了能量图以及导电和绝缘样品在与光谱仪有电接触和无电接触时的适当参考水平,并定义了最终电荷参考方法的标准,用它们来评估常见的参考技术。虽然没有哪种方法不存在问题,但基于不定碳 (AdC) 的最常用方法却最不可靠。特别是,由于真空度在 AdC-样品界面处对齐,来自 AdC 的参考 C 1s 峰的 BE 值并不恒定,而是随样品功函数的变化而变化。为了纠正这种情况,我们提出了一些简单易行的对照实验,以驳斥 C 1s 峰具有恒定 BE 的观点。我们还进一步使用能图框架来解释 AdC 样品界面上的真空层对齐对在最常见的实验配置中进行测量的影响。最后,我们提出了提高化学分析可靠性的建议,以促进新参考标准的开发。
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Materials is an online-only journal that is published weekly. It covers a wide range of scientific disciplines within materials science. The journal includes Reviews, Perspectives, and Comments.
Nature Reviews Materials focuses on various aspects of materials science, including the making, measuring, modelling, and manufacturing of materials. It examines the entire process of materials science, from laboratory discovery to the development of functional devices.