Value tensions and actionable knowledge in grassroots innovation: a study of invitational ambiguity and implementation challenges

IF 6.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Knowledge Management Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1108/jkm-04-2024-0385
Gabriella Esposito, Paola De Bernardi, Alberto Bertello, Demetris Vrontis
{"title":"Value tensions and actionable knowledge in grassroots innovation: a study of invitational ambiguity and implementation challenges","authors":"Gabriella Esposito, Paola De Bernardi, Alberto Bertello, Demetris Vrontis","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2024-0385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This research paper explores how grassroots innovation initiatives address and resolve the challenges of translating broad and inviting values such as sustainability, inclusiveness and aesthetics into practical and actionable structures. This study examines the tensions and difficulties projects face in operationalizing these values, revealing the gap between idealistic goals and real-world implementation. Moreover, this paper analyzes how role expectations and the concept of invitation ambiguity affect top down and bottom up approaches, offering insights for improving mechanisms to support grassroots innovations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study uses an exploratory qualitative methodology with an embedded case study design, focusing on the New European Bauhaus (NEB) and its award-winning projects. Data were collected through online self-assessment surveys, secondary data analysis, and semi-structured interviews with project owners and NEB Unit representatives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings reveal significant challenges in translating broad and inviting values (sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics) into actionable outcomes for grassroots projects. Key issues include the need for clearer role definitions, tailored support, and adaptability. Conflicts between those values and a mismatch between expectations about stakeholders’ contributions highlight the need for designing more flexible and robust frameworks and robust frameworks.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research explores the effects of invitational ambiguity within grassroots innovation, revealing how broad values ‐ like sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics ‐ are operationalized in real-world settings. By applying collective action theoretical frameworks to the unique case study of NEB projects, this study provides fresh insights into the dynamics between top-down European policies and bottom-up grassroots practices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knowledge Management","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-04-2024-0385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This research paper explores how grassroots innovation initiatives address and resolve the challenges of translating broad and inviting values such as sustainability, inclusiveness and aesthetics into practical and actionable structures. This study examines the tensions and difficulties projects face in operationalizing these values, revealing the gap between idealistic goals and real-world implementation. Moreover, this paper analyzes how role expectations and the concept of invitation ambiguity affect top down and bottom up approaches, offering insights for improving mechanisms to support grassroots innovations.

Design/methodology/approach

This study uses an exploratory qualitative methodology with an embedded case study design, focusing on the New European Bauhaus (NEB) and its award-winning projects. Data were collected through online self-assessment surveys, secondary data analysis, and semi-structured interviews with project owners and NEB Unit representatives.

Findings

The findings reveal significant challenges in translating broad and inviting values (sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics) into actionable outcomes for grassroots projects. Key issues include the need for clearer role definitions, tailored support, and adaptability. Conflicts between those values and a mismatch between expectations about stakeholders’ contributions highlight the need for designing more flexible and robust frameworks and robust frameworks.

Originality/value

This research explores the effects of invitational ambiguity within grassroots innovation, revealing how broad values ‐ like sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics ‐ are operationalized in real-world settings. By applying collective action theoretical frameworks to the unique case study of NEB projects, this study provides fresh insights into the dynamics between top-down European policies and bottom-up grassroots practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基层创新中的价值张力和可操作知识:关于邀请模糊性和实施挑战的研究
本研究论文探讨了基层创新倡议如何应对和解决将可持续发展、包容性和美学等广泛而诱人的价值观转化为实际可行的结构所面临的挑战。本研究探讨了项目在落实这些价值观时所面临的紧张关系和困难,揭示了理想化目标与实际执行之间的差距。此外,本文还分析了角色期望和邀请模糊性概念如何影响自上而下和自下而上的方法,为改进支持基层创新的机制提供了启示。 设计/方法/途径 本研究采用探索性定性方法和嵌入式案例研究设计,重点关注新欧洲包豪斯(NEB)及其获奖项目。通过在线自我评估调查、二手数据分析以及与项目所有者和新欧洲包豪斯单位代表的半结构式访谈收集了数据。关键问题包括需要更明确的角色定义、有针对性的支持和适应性。这些价值观之间的冲突以及对利益相关者贡献的预期之间的不匹配,凸显了设计更灵活、更稳健的框架和稳健框架的必要性。原创性/价值这项研究探讨了邀请模糊性在草根创新中的影响,揭示了广泛的价值观(如可持续性、包容性和美学)在现实世界环境中的可操作性。通过将集体行动理论框架应用于独特的国家环境局项目案例研究,本研究为自上而下的欧洲政策与自下而上的基层实践之间的动态关系提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
15.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Knowledge Management covers all the key issues in its field including: ■Developing an appropriate culture and communication strategy ■Integrating learning and knowledge infrastructure ■Knowledge management and the learning organization ■Information organization and retrieval technologies for improving the quality of knowledge ■Linking knowledge management to performance initiatives ■Retaining knowledge - human and intellectual capital ■Using information technology to develop knowledge management ■Knowledge management and innovation ■Measuring the value of knowledge already within an organization ■What lies beyond knowledge management?
期刊最新文献
Impact of fit between knowledge potential and organizational routine updating on subsidiaries’ new product development performance Knowledge spillovers between R&D-driven incumbents and start-ups in open innovation: a systematic review and nomological network Digital knowledge management in agile self-tuning organisations: a multiple case study Unleashing cultural diversity knowledge for improved knowledge sharing and integration: an in-depth qualitative analysis AI-empowered KM processes for decision-making: empirical evidence from worldwide organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1