The value of umbilical cord insertion site sampling in detecting maternal and/or fetal inflammatory response.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Apmis Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1111/apm.13496
Yin Ping Wong, Geok Chin Tan, T Yee Khong
{"title":"The value of umbilical cord insertion site sampling in detecting maternal and/or fetal inflammatory response.","authors":"Yin Ping Wong, Geok Chin Tan, T Yee Khong","doi":"10.1111/apm.13496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2016 Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement recommends sampling a block of the placenta close to the umbilical cord insertion site (UCIB) for histopathological evaluation. This piece of placenta at the umbilical cord insertion is presumed to give a better yield of inflammation (if present). We aimed to investigate the utility of the UCIB in the detection of maternal and/or fetal inflammatory responses (MIR and/or FIR), in comparison with the other sections of the placental parenchyma. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study including all placentas with histologic chorioamnionitis. The histopathological slides of placentas were reviewed as per Amsterdam consensus guidelines. Diagnostic performance of UCIB in identifying MIR and/or FIR, relative to the other placental sections, was assessed. UCIB revealed diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 79.2% (95% CI: 74.2-83.6%), 100.0% (95% CI: 95.6-100.0%), and 83.6% (95% CI: 79.5-87.2%), respectively, in the detection of FIR, while showing a low sensitivity of 52.6% (95% CI: 47.5-57.6%) in detecting MIR. In 59 (24.6%) cases, FIR was not seen in the corresponding placental parenchymal sections but was detected in the UCIBs. This study is the first study to confirm that a section from the UCIB is essential for the detection of FIR, which affirms the Amsterdam consensus sampling recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2016 Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement recommends sampling a block of the placenta close to the umbilical cord insertion site (UCIB) for histopathological evaluation. This piece of placenta at the umbilical cord insertion is presumed to give a better yield of inflammation (if present). We aimed to investigate the utility of the UCIB in the detection of maternal and/or fetal inflammatory responses (MIR and/or FIR), in comparison with the other sections of the placental parenchyma. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study including all placentas with histologic chorioamnionitis. The histopathological slides of placentas were reviewed as per Amsterdam consensus guidelines. Diagnostic performance of UCIB in identifying MIR and/or FIR, relative to the other placental sections, was assessed. UCIB revealed diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 79.2% (95% CI: 74.2-83.6%), 100.0% (95% CI: 95.6-100.0%), and 83.6% (95% CI: 79.5-87.2%), respectively, in the detection of FIR, while showing a low sensitivity of 52.6% (95% CI: 47.5-57.6%) in detecting MIR. In 59 (24.6%) cases, FIR was not seen in the corresponding placental parenchymal sections but was detected in the UCIBs. This study is the first study to confirm that a section from the UCIB is essential for the detection of FIR, which affirms the Amsterdam consensus sampling recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脐带插入部位取样在检测母体和/或胎儿炎症反应中的价值。
2016 年阿姆斯特丹胎盘工作小组共识声明建议在靠近脐带插入部位(UCIB)的胎盘块取样进行组织病理学评估。脐带插入处的这块胎盘被认为能更好地显示炎症(如果存在)。我们的目的是研究 UCIB 在检测母体和/或胎儿炎症反应(MIR 和/或 FIR)方面的作用,并与胎盘实质的其他切片进行比较。这是一项回顾性横断面研究,包括所有患有组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎的胎盘。根据阿姆斯特丹共识指南对胎盘组织病理学切片进行了审查。评估了 UCIB 在鉴别 MIR 和/或 FIR 方面相对于其他胎盘切片的诊断性能。UCIB在检测FIR方面的诊断敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性分别为79.2%(95% CI:74.2-83.6%)、100.0%(95% CI:95.6-100.0%)和83.6%(95% CI:79.5-87.2%),而在检测MIR方面的敏感性较低,仅为52.6%(95% CI:47.5-57.6%)。在 59 个(24.6%)病例中,FIR 在相应的胎盘实质切片中未见,但在 UCIB 中被检测到。该研究首次证实了 UCIB 切片对检测 FIR 至关重要,这也是对阿姆斯特丹共识取样建议的肯定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Apmis
Apmis 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.
期刊最新文献
Historical concepts and contemporary perspectives of dental caries-a tribute to Henrik Dam (1895-1976). Phylogeogenomic analysis of the earliest reported sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from 161 countries. Dynamic distribution of systemically administered antibiotics in orthopeadically relevant target tissues and settings. Impact of histopathological and serological assessments on early diagnosis of leprosy relapse. Possible inhibition effects of resveratrol on pancreatic tumorigenesis in the azaserine-rat model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1