Efficacy of High-Volume Low-Concentration Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Irrigation for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Bupivacaine Irrigation for Analgesia.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/4545400
Swati Panwar, Mona Arya, J S Dali, Kapil Chaudhary, Sushanto Neogi
{"title":"Efficacy of High-Volume Low-Concentration Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Irrigation for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Bupivacaine Irrigation for Analgesia.","authors":"Swati Panwar, Mona Arya, J S Dali, Kapil Chaudhary, Sushanto Neogi","doi":"10.1155/2024/4545400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Intraperitoneal irrigation with a low-volume, high-concentration local anaesthetic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) provides less pain relief. We investigated the impact of high-volume, low-concentration bupivacaine on postoperative pain and opioid requirement. <b>Methods:</b> Patients undergoing LC were randomised into Group B (20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine in 480 mL normal saline) or Group S (500 mL of normal saline). Fifteen patients were included in both the groups but one patient was excluded from Group S because of bile duct injury. The primary outcome was Duration of Analgesia (DOA). The secondary outcomes were the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) at extubation, at 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h. Cumulative rescue analgesics, incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting and shoulder pain. <b>Results:</b> Mean (median/range) duration of analgesia was 6.45 ± 5.57 h (6/0.15-24) in Group B vs 3.18 ± 4.21 h (0.3/0.15-12) in Group S. Cumulative requirement of rescue analgesic was higher in saline group being 56.25 ± 33.92 mg for diclofenac and 83.57 ± 66.75 mg for tramadol vis-à-vis 40.9 ± 39.17 mg and 30.00 ± 52.78 mg, respectively, in bupivacaine group. <b>Conclusion:</b> Irrigation of the peritoneal cavity with high-volume low-concentration bupivacaine in LC increases the duration of analgesia and decreases the analgesic requirement in the postoperative period. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CTRI/2019/02/017802 dated 25/02/2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4545400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intraperitoneal irrigation with a low-volume, high-concentration local anaesthetic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) provides less pain relief. We investigated the impact of high-volume, low-concentration bupivacaine on postoperative pain and opioid requirement. Methods: Patients undergoing LC were randomised into Group B (20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine in 480 mL normal saline) or Group S (500 mL of normal saline). Fifteen patients were included in both the groups but one patient was excluded from Group S because of bile duct injury. The primary outcome was Duration of Analgesia (DOA). The secondary outcomes were the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) at extubation, at 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h. Cumulative rescue analgesics, incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting and shoulder pain. Results: Mean (median/range) duration of analgesia was 6.45 ± 5.57 h (6/0.15-24) in Group B vs 3.18 ± 4.21 h (0.3/0.15-12) in Group S. Cumulative requirement of rescue analgesic was higher in saline group being 56.25 ± 33.92 mg for diclofenac and 83.57 ± 66.75 mg for tramadol vis-à-vis 40.9 ± 39.17 mg and 30.00 ± 52.78 mg, respectively, in bupivacaine group. Conclusion: Irrigation of the peritoneal cavity with high-volume low-concentration bupivacaine in LC increases the duration of analgesia and decreases the analgesic requirement in the postoperative period. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CTRI/2019/02/017802 dated 25/02/2019.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后高容量低浓度布比卡因灌洗镇痛的疗效:布比卡因灌洗镇痛。
背景:在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中使用低容量、高浓度的局麻药进行腹腔内灌注,镇痛效果较差。我们研究了高容量、低浓度布比卡因对术后疼痛和阿片类药物需求的影响。方法:接受 LC 的患者被随机分为 B 组(20 mL 0.5% 布比卡因与 480 mL 生理盐水混合)或 S 组(500 mL 生理盐水)。两组均有 15 名患者,但 S 组有一名患者因胆管损伤而被排除在外。主要结果是镇痛持续时间(DOA)。次要结果是拔管时、15 分钟、30 分钟、1、2、4、8、12 和 24 小时的数字疼痛评分量表(NRS)。结果:B 组的平均镇痛持续时间(中位数/范围)为 6.45 ± 5.57 小时(6/0.15-24),而 S 组为 3.18 ± 4.21 小时(0.3/0.15-12);生理盐水组的累计镇痛药需求量更高,双氯芬酸为 56.25 ± 33.92 毫克,曲马多为 83.57 ± 66.75 毫克,而布比卡因组分别为 40.9 ± 39.17 毫克和 30.00 ± 52.78 毫克。结论在LC中使用高容量低浓度布比卡因冲洗腹腔可延长镇痛时间,减少术后镇痛剂的需求量。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:CTRI/2019/02/017802,日期为2019年2月25日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of High-Volume Low-Concentration Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Irrigation for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Bupivacaine Irrigation for Analgesia. Association Between MRI Findings of Facet Arthropathy and Synovitis With Health-Related Outcome and Pain Scores Following Therapeutic Lumbar Facet Injections. Use of a Nasal Cannula as a Preoxygenation Adjunct: A Randomized Crossover Study. Weight-Based Standardized Sugammadex Dosing in Pediatrics: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Compliance with Dosing Guidelines and Reduce Waste and Cost. The Effect of Preoperative Anxiety on Motor and Sensory Block Duration and Effectiveness in Spinal Anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1