Derek K W Yau, Floria F Ng, Man-Kin H Wong, Malcolm J Underwood, Randolph H L Wong, Gavin M Joynt, Anna Lee
{"title":"Effect of exercise prehabilitation on quality of recovery after cardiac surgery: a single-centre randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Derek K W Yau, Floria F Ng, Man-Kin H Wong, Malcolm J Underwood, Randolph H L Wong, Gavin M Joynt, Anna Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical prehabilitation can enhance patient resilience to surgical stress, but its effects are unclear in vulnerable and frail patients. We aimed to determine the effect of a structured exercise prehabilitation programme on the quality of recovery after cardiac surgery in vulnerable and frail participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-blinded, parallel-arm, superiority, randomised controlled trial recruited patients with a Clinical Frailty Scale of 4-6 undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were randomised to either physical prehabilitation (twice weekly) or standard care (control); both arms received standard perioperative care. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score on the third day after surgery. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), days alive and at home (DAH<sub>30</sub>), and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 164 randomised patients, 138 were included in the primary analysis (median age 64 [interquartile range 60-69] yr; 70% males). Compliance with the 5-week prehabilitation programme was high (82%), with no adverse exercise-induced events reported. There were no between-group differences in QoR-15 scores (median difference -3, 95% confidence interval [CI] -9 to 3), early and late MACCE, and DAH<sub>30</sub> (P=0.779). Prehabilitated patients had lower disability levels than control patients (P=0.022) at 90 days after surgery (mean difference -9%, 95% CI -17% to -2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 5-week programme of physical prehabilitation in predominately prefrail patients was safe, but it did not enhance quality of recovery scores after surgery. Prehabilitation resulted in a clinically meaningful decrease in disability scores at 90 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR1800016098.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.039","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Physical prehabilitation can enhance patient resilience to surgical stress, but its effects are unclear in vulnerable and frail patients. We aimed to determine the effect of a structured exercise prehabilitation programme on the quality of recovery after cardiac surgery in vulnerable and frail participants.
Methods: This single-blinded, parallel-arm, superiority, randomised controlled trial recruited patients with a Clinical Frailty Scale of 4-6 undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were randomised to either physical prehabilitation (twice weekly) or standard care (control); both arms received standard perioperative care. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score on the third day after surgery. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), days alive and at home (DAH30), and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 metric.
Results: Of 164 randomised patients, 138 were included in the primary analysis (median age 64 [interquartile range 60-69] yr; 70% males). Compliance with the 5-week prehabilitation programme was high (82%), with no adverse exercise-induced events reported. There were no between-group differences in QoR-15 scores (median difference -3, 95% confidence interval [CI] -9 to 3), early and late MACCE, and DAH30 (P=0.779). Prehabilitated patients had lower disability levels than control patients (P=0.022) at 90 days after surgery (mean difference -9%, 95% CI -17% to -2%).
Conclusions: A 5-week programme of physical prehabilitation in predominately prefrail patients was safe, but it did not enhance quality of recovery scores after surgery. Prehabilitation resulted in a clinically meaningful decrease in disability scores at 90 days after surgery.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.