Yield and Effectiveness of 2-Sample Fecal Immunochemical Test–Based Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.010
Zenghao Xu , Jinhua Yang , Jiabei He , Qilong Li , Xinglin Fei , Hao Bai , Kai Gao , Yuanliang He , Chen Li , Mengling Tang , Jianbing Wang , Mingjuan Jin , Kun Chen
{"title":"Yield and Effectiveness of 2-Sample Fecal Immunochemical Test–Based Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer","authors":"Zenghao Xu ,&nbsp;Jinhua Yang ,&nbsp;Jiabei He ,&nbsp;Qilong Li ,&nbsp;Xinglin Fei ,&nbsp;Hao Bai ,&nbsp;Kai Gao ,&nbsp;Yuanliang He ,&nbsp;Chen Li ,&nbsp;Mengling Tang ,&nbsp;Jianbing Wang ,&nbsp;Mingjuan Jin ,&nbsp;Kun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality of China account for nearly 30% of the global attributable fraction. We aimed to estimate the yield and effectiveness of a 2-sample fecal immunochemical test (FIT)–based screening program in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eligible individuals were invited for 2-sample FIT between 2007 and 2021, with positive ones (cutoff 40 μg/g before 2013 and 20 μg/g thereafter) referred for colonoscopy. Participation rates, detection rates, and positive predictive values were calculated. Participants were classified into: FIT+/colonoscopy compliers, FIT+/colonoscopy noncompliers, and FIT– as control subjects. We compared CRC incidence and mortality and calculated the age reaching comparable risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 246,349 invitees, 150,524 (61.10%) participated in 2-sample FIT, with 16,994 (11.29%) identified as FIT+; 12,816 (75.41%) underwent colonoscopy, yielding a detection rate and positive predictive value of 0.57% and 6.70% for advanced neoplasia, respectively. Median follow-up was 10.58 years. Compared with FIT– participants, CRC incidence and mortality were relatively similar among FIT+/colonoscopy compliers with hazard ratios of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–1.19) and 1.62 (95% CI, 1.09 to 2.41) but higher among noncompliers, with hazard ratios of 3.52 (95% CI, 2.85–4.34) and 4.41 (95% CI, 2.96–6.55). Taking CRC incidence and mortality risk of FIT– participants at 50.0 years of age as the benchmark, FIT+/colonoscopy compliers reached same risk at 50.6 and 46.1 years of age, while noncompliers reached the same risk at 38.0 and 37.9 years of age, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Two-sample FIT could effectively identify high-risk populations, and colonoscopy compliance is associated with a lower risk of CRC incidence and mortality. This strategy might facilitate CRC screening practice in countries with large populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"23 7","pages":"Pages 1238-1246.e6"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356524009844","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality of China account for nearly 30% of the global attributable fraction. We aimed to estimate the yield and effectiveness of a 2-sample fecal immunochemical test (FIT)–based screening program in China.

Methods

Eligible individuals were invited for 2-sample FIT between 2007 and 2021, with positive ones (cutoff 40 μg/g before 2013 and 20 μg/g thereafter) referred for colonoscopy. Participation rates, detection rates, and positive predictive values were calculated. Participants were classified into: FIT+/colonoscopy compliers, FIT+/colonoscopy noncompliers, and FIT– as control subjects. We compared CRC incidence and mortality and calculated the age reaching comparable risk.

Results

Among 246,349 invitees, 150,524 (61.10%) participated in 2-sample FIT, with 16,994 (11.29%) identified as FIT+; 12,816 (75.41%) underwent colonoscopy, yielding a detection rate and positive predictive value of 0.57% and 6.70% for advanced neoplasia, respectively. Median follow-up was 10.58 years. Compared with FIT– participants, CRC incidence and mortality were relatively similar among FIT+/colonoscopy compliers with hazard ratios of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–1.19) and 1.62 (95% CI, 1.09 to 2.41) but higher among noncompliers, with hazard ratios of 3.52 (95% CI, 2.85–4.34) and 4.41 (95% CI, 2.96–6.55). Taking CRC incidence and mortality risk of FIT– participants at 50.0 years of age as the benchmark, FIT+/colonoscopy compliers reached same risk at 50.6 and 46.1 years of age, while noncompliers reached the same risk at 38.0 and 37.9 years of age, respectively.

Conclusions

Two-sample FIT could effectively identify high-risk populations, and colonoscopy compliance is associated with a lower risk of CRC incidence and mortality. This strategy might facilitate CRC screening practice in countries with large populations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于两份粪便免疫化学检验样本的大肠癌筛查计划的收益和效果。
背景和目的:中国的结直肠癌(CRC)发病率和死亡率占全球的近30%。我们旨在估算中国以粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)为基础的双样本筛查项目的收益率和有效性:方法:2007 年至 2021 年间,我们邀请符合条件的个人进行双样本粪便免疫化学检测,阳性者(2013 年前的临界值为 40 μg/g,之后为 20 μg/g)将被转诊至结肠镜检查。计算了参与率、检出率和阳性预测值 (PPV)。参与者被分为FIT+/结肠镜检查符合者、FIT+/结肠镜检查不符合者和 FIT- 作为对照组。我们比较了 CRC 发病率和死亡率,并计算了达到可比风险的年龄:在 246,349 名受邀者中,150,524 人(61.10%)参加了双样本 FIT,其中 16,994 人(11.29%)被确定为 FIT+;12,816 人(75.41%)接受了结肠镜检查,晚期肿瘤的检出率和 PPV 分别为 0.57% 和 6.70%。中位随访时间为 10.58 年。与 FIT- 参与者相比,FIT+/结肠镜检查合格者的 CRC 发病率和死亡率相对相似,危险比 (HR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 分别为 0.94 (0.75-1.19) 和 1.62 (1.09-2.41),但非合格者的 CRC 发病率和死亡率较高,危险比和 95% 置信区间分别为 3.52 (2.85-4.34) 和 4.41 (2.96-6.55)。以 FIT- 参与者 50.0 岁时的 CRC 发病率和死亡率风险为基准,FIT+/结肠镜检查符合者分别在 50.6 岁和 46.1 岁时达到相同的风险,而非符合者分别在 38.0 岁和 37.9 岁时达到相同的风险:结论:双样本 FIT 可有效识别高风险人群,结肠镜检查达标与较低的 CRC 发病率和死亡率风险相关。这一策略可能会促进人口众多国家的 CRC 筛查实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
期刊最新文献
GASTRIC EMPTYING, COLON FILLING, AND MULTIREGIONAL GUT TRANSIT DELAYS ARE PREVALENT ON GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE-1 AGONISTS Mentorship in Gastroenterology - The Final Lesson. Is enteroscopy alone adequate for assessment of mucosal healing in proximal ileum? Response to Letter to Editor. Re: Oral Contraceptives and Risk of GERD and Related Esophageal Outcomes - A Cautionary Tale of Hormonal Exposures in Large Database Networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1