Generalizability of pharmaceutical randomized controlled trial eligibility criteria for progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1183/13993003.01575-2024
Yet H Khor, Kerri A Johannson, Veronica Marcoux, Jolene H Fisher, Deborah Assayag, Helene Manganas, Nasreen Khalil, Daniel-Costin Marinescu, Nestor L Muller, Martin Kolb, Christopher J Ryerson
{"title":"Generalizability of pharmaceutical randomized controlled trial eligibility criteria for progressive pulmonary fibrosis.","authors":"Yet H Khor, Kerri A Johannson, Veronica Marcoux, Jolene H Fisher, Deborah Assayag, Helene Manganas, Nasreen Khalil, Daniel-Costin Marinescu, Nestor L Muller, Martin Kolb, Christopher J Ryerson","doi":"10.1183/13993003.01575-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PFF) is of substantial interest for novel pharmacotherapy discovery, but little is known about clinical trial eligibility criteria. We evaluated eligibility criteria of PPF randomized controlled trials (RCTs), their representativeness in registry patients, and forced vital capacity (FVC) changes and mortality according to trial eligibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was used to identify completed and in-progress phase II and III PPF RCTs. <i>Common clinical trial eligibility criteria</i> used in ≥60% of previous PPF RCTs were identified. The most common criteria for PPF used in RCTs (\"trial-PPF criteria\") and the clinical practice guideline definition of PPF (\"guideline-PPF criteria\") were both applied to patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter Canadian registry. Common trial eligibility criteria were tested for their frequency and association with health outcomes in registry patients who met trial-PPF and guideline-PPF criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten different definitions of PPF were used in 16 RCTs. At the time of meeting PPF definitions, 50% of 864 patients with trial-PPF and 44% of 408 patients with guideline-PPF met the common trial eligibility criteria. For both definitions, trial-eligible patients had more rapid 1-year FVC decline but better transplant-free survival than trial-ineligible patients. Patients with unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (ILD) had higher proportion of trial exclusion compared to those with connective tissue disease-associated ILD and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Annual FVC decline (trial-PPF: -67 to -21 mL; guideline-PPF: -116 to -41 mL) and 1-year transplant-free survival (trial-PPF: 90.5 to 97.5%; guideline-PPF: 87 to 96.2%) varied in trial-eligible patients across ILD subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing RCTs use a variety of definitions for PPF with eligibility criteria that have limited representativeness. FVC decline and transplant-free survival vary according to trial eligibility and ILD subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01575-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PFF) is of substantial interest for novel pharmacotherapy discovery, but little is known about clinical trial eligibility criteria. We evaluated eligibility criteria of PPF randomized controlled trials (RCTs), their representativeness in registry patients, and forced vital capacity (FVC) changes and mortality according to trial eligibility.

Methods: A systematic search was used to identify completed and in-progress phase II and III PPF RCTs. Common clinical trial eligibility criteria used in ≥60% of previous PPF RCTs were identified. The most common criteria for PPF used in RCTs ("trial-PPF criteria") and the clinical practice guideline definition of PPF ("guideline-PPF criteria") were both applied to patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter Canadian registry. Common trial eligibility criteria were tested for their frequency and association with health outcomes in registry patients who met trial-PPF and guideline-PPF criteria.

Results: Ten different definitions of PPF were used in 16 RCTs. At the time of meeting PPF definitions, 50% of 864 patients with trial-PPF and 44% of 408 patients with guideline-PPF met the common trial eligibility criteria. For both definitions, trial-eligible patients had more rapid 1-year FVC decline but better transplant-free survival than trial-ineligible patients. Patients with unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (ILD) had higher proportion of trial exclusion compared to those with connective tissue disease-associated ILD and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Annual FVC decline (trial-PPF: -67 to -21 mL; guideline-PPF: -116 to -41 mL) and 1-year transplant-free survival (trial-PPF: 90.5 to 97.5%; guideline-PPF: 87 to 96.2%) varied in trial-eligible patients across ILD subtypes.

Conclusions: Existing RCTs use a variety of definitions for PPF with eligibility criteria that have limited representativeness. FVC decline and transplant-free survival vary according to trial eligibility and ILD subtypes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进行性肺纤维化药物随机对照试验资格标准的通用性。
背景:进行性肺纤维化(PFF)对新型药物疗法的发现具有重大意义,但人们对临床试验的资格标准知之甚少。我们评估了进行性肺纤维化随机对照试验(RCT)的资格标准、其在登记患者中的代表性,以及根据试验资格确定的用力肺活量(FVC)变化和死亡率:方法:采用系统检索的方法确定已完成和正在进行的 PPF 二期和三期随机对照试验。确定了≥60%的既往PPF RCT使用的通用临床试验资格标准。研究性临床试验中最常用的 PPF 标准("试验-PPF 标准")和临床实践指南对 PPF 的定义("指南-PPF 标准")均适用于加拿大前瞻性多中心登记处登记的患者。对符合试验-PPF标准和指南-PPF标准的登记患者进行了常见试验资格标准频率及其与健康结果之间关系的测试:结果:16 项研究中使用了 10 种不同的 PPF 定义。在符合 PPF 定义时,864 名试验-PPF 患者中有 50% 符合通用试验资格标准,408 名指导-PPF 患者中有 44% 符合通用试验资格标准。在这两种定义中,符合试验资格的患者与不符合试验资格的患者相比,1 年 FVC 下降更快,但无移植生存率更高。与结缔组织病相关性间质性肺病和纤维化超敏性肺炎患者相比,不可分类的间质性肺病患者被排除试验的比例更高。不同ILD亚型的符合试验条件的患者年FVC下降率(试验-PPF:-67至-21 mL;指南-PPF:-116至-41 mL)和1年无移植生存率(试验-PPF:90.5至97.5%;指南-PPF:87至96.2%)各不相同:结论:现有的 RCT 采用了多种 PPF 定义,其资格标准的代表性有限。FVC下降和无移植生存率因试验资格和ILD亚型而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.
期刊最新文献
Airway derived emphysema-specific alveolar type II cells exhibit impaired regenerative potential in COPD. Pharmacological and pre-clinical safety profile of rSIV.F/HN, a hybrid lentiviral vector for cystic fibrosis gene therapy. Resolution of tuberculosis blood RNA signatures fails to discriminate persistent sputum culture positivity after 8 weeks of anti-tuberculous treatment. Microenvironmental acidification by pneumococcal sugar consumption fosters barrier disruption and immune suppression in the human alveolus. Single cell sequencing reveals cellular landscape alterations in the airway mucosa of patients with pulmonary long COVID.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1