Defining vulnerabilities and enabling community engagement in epidemics preparedness: the CAVE model from Austria.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH European Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckae173
Paul Grohma, Silvia Wojczewski, Barbara Juen, Priya-Lena Riedel, Frederik Seufert, Vanessa Streifeneder, Steffen Reichel, Sandra Pichler, Vanessa Kulcar, Sandra Nestlinger, Monika Stickler, Cornelia Schober, Hermann Scheller, Ruth Kutalek
{"title":"Defining vulnerabilities and enabling community engagement in epidemics preparedness: the CAVE model from Austria.","authors":"Paul Grohma, Silvia Wojczewski, Barbara Juen, Priya-Lena Riedel, Frederik Seufert, Vanessa Streifeneder, Steffen Reichel, Sandra Pichler, Vanessa Kulcar, Sandra Nestlinger, Monika Stickler, Cornelia Schober, Hermann Scheller, Ruth Kutalek","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckae173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 outbreak the transdisciplinary research project CAVE (Community Engagement and Vulnerability Assessment in Epidemics) investigated perceptions and practicability of public health communication among stakeholders of care and social facilities in Austria. It aimed at finding accurate definitions of vulnerability in the context of epidemics and at developing operational models for engagement of vulnerable groups in co-creating epidemic response mechanisms. Transdisciplinary methods included semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and desk reviews as well as spatial analysis and composite indicator-based mapping methods. Informants and participants in the community engagement phase represented clients as well as middle and lower management levels of Austrian care and social facilities for older persons and persons with cognitive impairments, persons depending on mobile healthcare services, homeless people, and socially deprived communities. A narrow definition of vulnerability as well as missing strategies for participation and community engagement limited communication with stakeholders and the implementation of protective measures. An inclusive definition of vulnerability beyond medical and physical indicators should be employed to account for social, psychological, and emotional aspects contributing to a higher risk of being affected by epidemics. The CAVE model provides a multi-level definition of vulnerability that allows for participatory engagement in co-creating adapted crisis response measures. We suggest policymakers and health authorities to consider a broader definition of vulnerability and to commit to pro-active engagement with stakeholders representing these sectors. This requires the establishment and maintenance of communication structures as well as political recognition of civic participation in the creation and implementation of epidemic response measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 outbreak the transdisciplinary research project CAVE (Community Engagement and Vulnerability Assessment in Epidemics) investigated perceptions and practicability of public health communication among stakeholders of care and social facilities in Austria. It aimed at finding accurate definitions of vulnerability in the context of epidemics and at developing operational models for engagement of vulnerable groups in co-creating epidemic response mechanisms. Transdisciplinary methods included semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and desk reviews as well as spatial analysis and composite indicator-based mapping methods. Informants and participants in the community engagement phase represented clients as well as middle and lower management levels of Austrian care and social facilities for older persons and persons with cognitive impairments, persons depending on mobile healthcare services, homeless people, and socially deprived communities. A narrow definition of vulnerability as well as missing strategies for participation and community engagement limited communication with stakeholders and the implementation of protective measures. An inclusive definition of vulnerability beyond medical and physical indicators should be employed to account for social, psychological, and emotional aspects contributing to a higher risk of being affected by epidemics. The CAVE model provides a multi-level definition of vulnerability that allows for participatory engagement in co-creating adapted crisis response measures. We suggest policymakers and health authorities to consider a broader definition of vulnerability and to commit to pro-active engagement with stakeholders representing these sectors. This requires the establishment and maintenance of communication structures as well as political recognition of civic participation in the creation and implementation of epidemic response measures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定脆弱性并促进社区参与流行病防备:奥地利的 CAVE 模式。
在 COVID-19 疫情爆发期间,跨学科研究项目 CAVE(流行病中的社区参与和脆弱性评估)调查了奥地利护理和社会设施利益相关者对公共卫生交流的看法和实用性。该项目旨在找到流行病背景下脆弱性的准确定义,并为弱势群体参与共同创建流行病应对机制开发操作模型。跨学科方法包括半结构式访谈、焦点小组讨论、案头审查以及空间分析和基于综合指标的绘图方法。社区参与阶段的信息提供者和参与者代表了为老年人和有认知障碍者、依赖流动医疗服务的人、无家可归者和社会贫困社区提供服务的奥地利护理和社会设施的客户以及中低层管理人员。对脆弱性的狭义定义以及参与和社区参与战略的缺失,限制了与利益相关者的沟通和保护措施的实施。除了医疗和身体指标外,还应该采用一个包容性的脆弱性定义,以考虑到社会、心理和情感方面导致受流行病影响风险较高的因素。CAVE 模型为脆弱性提供了一个多层次的定义,使人们能够参与进来,共同制定适应性危机应对措施。我们建议政策制定者和卫生当局考虑对脆弱性进行更广泛的定义,并致力于与代表这些部门的利益相关者积极合作。这就需要建立和维护沟通结构,并在政治上承认公民参与制定和实施流行病应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
期刊最新文献
Support for a ban on characterizing flavours in cigarettes in the UK: a longitudinal online survey. Prospective relationship between family screen time rules, obesogenic behaviours, and childhood obesity. Association of unemployment and increased depressive symptoms with all-cause mortality: follow-up study of a cardiovascular prevention programme. Correction. The impact of reminders on representativeness and survey estimates among web-mode invited in the Danish National Health Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1