Modeling soil acidity (pH) dynamics under extreme agroclimatic conditions in Horro Guduru Wallaga Zone, northwestern Ethiopia.

IF 3.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Geochemistry and Health Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s10653-024-02259-x
Dirribsa Hunduma Temesgen, Fedhasa Benti Chalchissa
{"title":"Modeling soil acidity (pH) dynamics under extreme agroclimatic conditions in Horro Guduru Wallaga Zone, northwestern Ethiopia.","authors":"Dirribsa Hunduma Temesgen, Fedhasa Benti Chalchissa","doi":"10.1007/s10653-024-02259-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soil plays a critical role in nutrient availability, microbial activity, and fertility in agriculture. However, the effects of agroclimatic conditions on soil pH are not well understood, particularly in the Horro Guduru Zone of Ethiopia. This study aimed to investigate the soil pH under extremely wet and dry conditions across 3 shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) scenarios: SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5. Baseline agroclimatic data (1981-2010) and future projections (2041-2070) were obtained from the European Commission Climate Change Services. Soil pH data at a 250 m resolution were extracted from the FAO-UNESCO global soil map. Missing values, multicollinearity, and outliers were addressed before modeling. Predictive models, including neural networks, generalized regression, and bootstrap forests, were validated, with the generalized regression model showing the best performance. The results indicate that soil pH decreases under consecutive dry‒wet conditions and increases with increasing maximum day temperatures across all scenarios. Soil pH is significantly influenced by the number of consecutive dry days, consecutive wet days, and maximum day temperature. The SSP1-2.6 and SSP2-4.5 scenarios resulted in improved pH levels, whereas SSP5-8.5 led to a decrease in soil pH, averaging 5.79 and decreasing to 5.54. These findings suggest that under SSP5-8.5, soil health and farming productivity may be compromised. This study emphasizes the need to adjust soil management practices based on prevailing climatic conditions to ensure soil health and agricultural sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"46 12","pages":"490"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02259-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil plays a critical role in nutrient availability, microbial activity, and fertility in agriculture. However, the effects of agroclimatic conditions on soil pH are not well understood, particularly in the Horro Guduru Zone of Ethiopia. This study aimed to investigate the soil pH under extremely wet and dry conditions across 3 shared socioeconomic pathway (SSP) scenarios: SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5. Baseline agroclimatic data (1981-2010) and future projections (2041-2070) were obtained from the European Commission Climate Change Services. Soil pH data at a 250 m resolution were extracted from the FAO-UNESCO global soil map. Missing values, multicollinearity, and outliers were addressed before modeling. Predictive models, including neural networks, generalized regression, and bootstrap forests, were validated, with the generalized regression model showing the best performance. The results indicate that soil pH decreases under consecutive dry‒wet conditions and increases with increasing maximum day temperatures across all scenarios. Soil pH is significantly influenced by the number of consecutive dry days, consecutive wet days, and maximum day temperature. The SSP1-2.6 and SSP2-4.5 scenarios resulted in improved pH levels, whereas SSP5-8.5 led to a decrease in soil pH, averaging 5.79 and decreasing to 5.54. These findings suggest that under SSP5-8.5, soil health and farming productivity may be compromised. This study emphasizes the need to adjust soil management practices based on prevailing climatic conditions to ensure soil health and agricultural sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚西北部 Horro Guduru Wallaga 区极端农业气候条件下的土壤酸度(pH 值)动态模型。
土壤在农业养分供应、微生物活动和肥力方面起着至关重要的作用。然而,人们对农业气候条件对土壤 pH 值的影响并不十分了解,尤其是在埃塞俄比亚的霍罗古杜鲁区。本研究旨在调查 3 种共同社会经济路径(SSP)情景下极度潮湿和干燥条件下的土壤 pH 值:SSP1-2.6、SSP2-4.5 和 SSP5-8.5。基线农业气候数据(1981-2010 年)和未来预测数据(2041-2070 年)来自欧盟委员会气候变化服务部。分辨率为 250 米的土壤 pH 值数据来自联合国粮农组织-教科文组织全球土壤地图。在建模之前,对缺失值、多重共线性和异常值进行了处理。对包括神经网络、广义回归和自举森林在内的预测模型进行了验证,其中广义回归模型表现最佳。结果表明,在所有情况下,土壤 pH 值在连续干湿条件下都会降低,并随着日最高气温的升高而升高。土壤 pH 值受连续干旱天数、连续潮湿天数和最高日气温的影响很大。SSP1-2.6 和 SSP2-4.5 方案改善了土壤 pH 值,而 SSP5-8.5 方案则导致土壤 pH 值下降,平均为 5.79,最低为 5.54。这些研究结果表明,在 SSP5-8.5 条件下,土壤健康和农业生产力可能会受到损害。这项研究强调,有必要根据当时的气候条件调整土壤管理方法,以确保土壤健康和农业的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Geochemistry and Health
Environmental Geochemistry and Health 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people. Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes. The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.
期刊最新文献
Distribution, assessment, and causality analysis of soil heavy metals pollution in complex contaminated sites: a case study of a chemical plant. Hydrochemical characteristics, cross-layer pollution and environmental health risk of groundwater system in coal mine area: a case study of Jiangzhuang coal mine. Environmental microplastic and phthalate esters co-contamination, interrelationships, co-toxicity and mechanisms. A review. Cultivable bacteria contribute to the removal of diclofenac and naproxen mix in a constructed wetland with Typha latifolia. Mercury in saliva, milk, and hair of nursing mothers in southeastern Iranian mothers: levels, distribution and risk assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1