A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between sensory processing differences and internalising/externalising problems in autism

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102516
Yixin Chen , Zhenyang Xi , Rob Saunders , David Simmons , Vasiliki Totsika , Will Mandy
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between sensory processing differences and internalising/externalising problems in autism","authors":"Yixin Chen ,&nbsp;Zhenyang Xi ,&nbsp;Rob Saunders ,&nbsp;David Simmons ,&nbsp;Vasiliki Totsika ,&nbsp;Will Mandy","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is evidence to suggest that sensory processing differences (SPDs) to external stimuli are a plausible underlying mechanism for mental health problems among autistic people. In the current systematic review, we examined the associations between, on the one hand, eleven types of SPDs and, on the other hand, internalising and externalising problems. The literature search was conducted on five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL) between 1990 and August 2024. Studies with autistic people aged under 65 years-old that reported correlations between SPDs and internalising/externalising problems were included. Three-level and random-effects meta-analyses and narrative synthesis were conducted. In total, we included 63 articles (11,659 participants) in the current review. Overall, higher levels of all SPD subtypes were found to be associated with greater internalising/externalising problems. Hypersensitivity, visual, auditory, and tactile sensitivities were strongly associated with internalising/externalising problems, while smaller effects were observed for unusual processing of smell and taste. Sensation seeking was highly linked with externalising problems, whereas it was the least associated sensory subtype with internalising problems. Future studies could address the limitations in the extant literature (e.g., heterogeneity in the estimates of associations, a lack of externalising problem investigations and longitudinal studies) to further advance our understanding of the role of SPDs in the aetiology, development, and treatment of internalising/externalising problems in autism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102516"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001375","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is evidence to suggest that sensory processing differences (SPDs) to external stimuli are a plausible underlying mechanism for mental health problems among autistic people. In the current systematic review, we examined the associations between, on the one hand, eleven types of SPDs and, on the other hand, internalising and externalising problems. The literature search was conducted on five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CINAHL) between 1990 and August 2024. Studies with autistic people aged under 65 years-old that reported correlations between SPDs and internalising/externalising problems were included. Three-level and random-effects meta-analyses and narrative synthesis were conducted. In total, we included 63 articles (11,659 participants) in the current review. Overall, higher levels of all SPD subtypes were found to be associated with greater internalising/externalising problems. Hypersensitivity, visual, auditory, and tactile sensitivities were strongly associated with internalising/externalising problems, while smaller effects were observed for unusual processing of smell and taste. Sensation seeking was highly linked with externalising problems, whereas it was the least associated sensory subtype with internalising problems. Future studies could address the limitations in the extant literature (e.g., heterogeneity in the estimates of associations, a lack of externalising problem investigations and longitudinal studies) to further advance our understanding of the role of SPDs in the aetiology, development, and treatment of internalising/externalising problems in autism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症患者感觉处理差异与内化/外化问题之间关系的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
有证据表明,对外界刺激的感觉处理差异(SPDs)是自闭症患者出现心理健康问题的一个可信的潜在机制。在本系统综述中,我们研究了 11 种 SPD 与内化和外化问题之间的关联。文献检索在 1990 年至 2024 年 8 月期间的五个数据库(MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 CINAHL)中进行。研究对象为 65 岁以下的自闭症患者,研究内容包括 SPD 与内化/外化问题之间的相关性。我们进行了三级随机效应荟萃分析和叙述性综合分析。本次综述共纳入 63 篇文章(11659 名参与者)。总体而言,所有 SPD 亚型的较高水平都与较严重的内化/外化问题有关。过度敏感、视觉、听觉和触觉敏感与内化/外化问题密切相关,而嗅觉和味觉异常处理的影响较小。寻求感觉与外部化问题的关联度很高,而它是与内部化问题关联度最低的感官亚型。未来的研究可以解决现有文献的局限性(例如,关联估计的异质性、缺乏外部化问题调查和纵向研究),从而进一步加深我们对自闭症患者内化/外部化问题的病因、发展和治疗中SPDs作用的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024) Five-factor personality traits and functional somatic disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis What is fidelity? A systematic review of provider fidelity and its associations with engagement and outcomes in parenting programs Prevalence of mental health conditions, substance use disorders, suicidal ideation and attempts, and experiences of homelessness among Veterans with criminal-legal involvement: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1