{"title":"Information and Communication Technology-based Assessment for Children with Developmental Needs: Kids Brain Balancer.","authors":"Tomoko Sugiyama, Keiji Hashimoto, Nobuyuki Kawate","doi":"10.31662/jmaj.2024-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined the test-retest reliability of the Kids Brain Balancer, a tablet-based cognitive assessment app, among children in the special education system and gathered preliminary validity evidence by evaluating score agreement with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 36 children undergoing special education (aged 7-11 years) completed the Balancer tasks more than three times for over 1 month. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) facilitated the analysis of score reliability across sessions. Score agreement with Wechsler indices were evaluated for each task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the nine tasks, six demonstrated moderate-to-good reliability for raw or age-adjusted scores. The Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ), composite scores on the WISC-IV, and Balancer index scores on several tasks exhibited moderate-to-strong correlations over three repeated test administrations. Agreement with the FSIQ varied; however, most visuospatial/executive tasks initially correlated better, whereas verbal/working memory tasks converged by the third session. Those with lower baseline scores exhibited improvement in agreement over repeat testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides initial evidence supporting the validity and test-retest reliability of the Kids Brain Balancer in evaluating intellectual/cognitive functioning among children undergoing special education. Enhancement and wider testing could establish this convenient tool to support evaluation of diverse developmental needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73550,"journal":{"name":"JMA journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2024-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study examined the test-retest reliability of the Kids Brain Balancer, a tablet-based cognitive assessment app, among children in the special education system and gathered preliminary validity evidence by evaluating score agreement with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV).
Methods: A total of 36 children undergoing special education (aged 7-11 years) completed the Balancer tasks more than three times for over 1 month. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) facilitated the analysis of score reliability across sessions. Score agreement with Wechsler indices were evaluated for each task.
Results: Of the nine tasks, six demonstrated moderate-to-good reliability for raw or age-adjusted scores. The Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ), composite scores on the WISC-IV, and Balancer index scores on several tasks exhibited moderate-to-strong correlations over three repeated test administrations. Agreement with the FSIQ varied; however, most visuospatial/executive tasks initially correlated better, whereas verbal/working memory tasks converged by the third session. Those with lower baseline scores exhibited improvement in agreement over repeat testing.
Conclusions: This study provides initial evidence supporting the validity and test-retest reliability of the Kids Brain Balancer in evaluating intellectual/cognitive functioning among children undergoing special education. Enhancement and wider testing could establish this convenient tool to support evaluation of diverse developmental needs.