"What Matters" in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Analysis of Older Adults' Concerns and Desired Outcomes.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002053
Tonya Chera, Mary Tinetti, Jasmine Travers, James Galske, Arjun K Venkatesh, Lauren Southerland, Scott M Dresden, Colleen McQuown, Cameron J Gettel
{"title":"\"What Matters\" in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Analysis of Older Adults' Concerns and Desired Outcomes.","authors":"Tonya Chera, Mary Tinetti, Jasmine Travers, James Galske, Arjun K Venkatesh, Lauren Southerland, Scott M Dresden, Colleen McQuown, Cameron J Gettel","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe \"What Matters\" to older adults seeking emergency department (ED) care and to identify patient characteristics associated with meeting desired outcomes.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>As part of the 4Ms framework, identifying \"What Matters\" has been captured across healthcare settings, yet limited attention has been directed to older adults in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. The study enrolled 1013 patients aged 65 and older during an ED encounter and performed 90-day follow-up interviews. The primary outcome was the quantification of \"What Matters\" (concerns and desired outcomes) to older adults during emergency care. As secondary outcomes, we assessed concerns at day 90, if desired outcomes were met at follow-up, and patient characteristics associated with outcome achievement by estimating multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older adults reported specific concerns at the time of the ED visit including: (1) symptom identification and/or persistence (31.4%), (2) ability to take care of oneself (19.4%), and (3) end-of-life (17.8%). Desired outcomes expressed by participants included: (1) getting well and symptom resolution (72.0%), (2) obtaining a diagnosis (25.7%), and (3) functional independence (19.5%). At day 90 follow-up, concerns remained similar to the initial ED visit, and the majority of participants (66.2%) achieved their desired outcome. Frailty (adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83, P < 0.01) was associated with older adults not meeting their desired outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older adults identified a variety of concerns during emergency care, and two-thirds reported that desired outcomes were met at longitudinal day 90 follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"62 12 Suppl 1","pages":"S50-S56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe "What Matters" to older adults seeking emergency department (ED) care and to identify patient characteristics associated with meeting desired outcomes.

Background: As part of the 4Ms framework, identifying "What Matters" has been captured across healthcare settings, yet limited attention has been directed to older adults in the ED.

Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. The study enrolled 1013 patients aged 65 and older during an ED encounter and performed 90-day follow-up interviews. The primary outcome was the quantification of "What Matters" (concerns and desired outcomes) to older adults during emergency care. As secondary outcomes, we assessed concerns at day 90, if desired outcomes were met at follow-up, and patient characteristics associated with outcome achievement by estimating multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: Older adults reported specific concerns at the time of the ED visit including: (1) symptom identification and/or persistence (31.4%), (2) ability to take care of oneself (19.4%), and (3) end-of-life (17.8%). Desired outcomes expressed by participants included: (1) getting well and symptom resolution (72.0%), (2) obtaining a diagnosis (25.7%), and (3) functional independence (19.5%). At day 90 follow-up, concerns remained similar to the initial ED visit, and the majority of participants (66.2%) achieved their desired outcome. Frailty (adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83, P < 0.01) was associated with older adults not meeting their desired outcomes.

Conclusions: Older adults identified a variety of concerns during emergency care, and two-thirds reported that desired outcomes were met at longitudinal day 90 follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊室中的 "重要事项":对老年人关注的问题和期望结果的前瞻性分析。
摘要描述寻求急诊科(ED)治疗的老年人的 "重要事项",并确定与达到预期结果相关的患者特征:背景:作为 4Ms 框架的一部分,确定 "什么是重要的 "已被纳入各种医疗机构,但对急诊科老年人的关注却很有限:我们对一项多中心前瞻性观察研究进行了二次分析。该研究共招募了 1013 名 65 岁及以上的急诊患者,并进行了 90 天的随访。主要结果是量化老年人在急诊护理期间的 "重要事项"(关注点和期望结果)。作为次要结果,我们通过估计多变量逻辑回归模型,评估了第 90 天的关注点、随访时是否达到预期结果以及与达到结果相关的患者特征:老年人在急诊室就诊时报告的具体问题包括:(1) 症状识别和/或持续性(31.4%),(2) 生活自理能力(19.4%),(3) 生命终结(17.8%)。参与者表达的期望结果包括(1) 康复和症状缓解(72.0%),(2) 获得诊断(25.7%),(3) 功能独立(19.5%)。在第 90 天的随访中,所关注的问题与最初到急诊室就诊时相似,大多数参与者(66.2%)都达到了预期结果。虚弱(调整后的几率比=0.56,95% CI:0.38-0.83,P <0.01)与老年人未达到预期结果有关:结论:老年人在急诊护理过程中发现了各种问题,三分之二的老年人表示在第 90 天的纵向随访中达到了预期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
期刊最新文献
Community Benefit and Tax-Exemption Levels at Non-Profit Hospitals Across US States. Using Z Codes to Document Social Risk Factors in the Electronic Health Record: A Scoping Review. Comparison of Alternative Approaches to Using Race-and-Ethnicity Data in Estimating Differences in Health Care and Social Determinants of Health. Facility-Level Differences in Antipsychotic Drug Use: Impact on Quality Outcomes for Nursing Home Residents. Knowledge of Medical Interpretation Rights Among Individuals With Non-English Language Preference: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1