[GLIM criteria for diagnosing malnutrition in institutionalized older adults].

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BUSINESS Nutricion hospitalaria Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.20960/nh.05283
David Robles Torres, Brais Bea Mascato, María Alfonsín Lara, Elena Yaiza Romero Ventosa, Nerea García Beloso, Aída López López, Patricia Pérez Castro, Noemí Martínez López de Castro, Natividad Lago Rivero
{"title":"[GLIM criteria for diagnosing malnutrition in institutionalized older adults].","authors":"David Robles Torres, Brais Bea Mascato, María Alfonsín Lara, Elena Yaiza Romero Ventosa, Nerea García Beloso, Aída López López, Patricia Pérez Castro, Noemí Martínez López de Castro, Natividad Lago Rivero","doi":"10.20960/nh.05283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Introduction: the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) was created to unify the diagnosis of malnutrition worldwide. The main objective of this work is to evaluate the validity of the GLIM criteria for diagnosing malnutrition in a population over 65 years of age living in a nursing home. In addition, the order of importance of the GLIM criteria for diagnosing malnutrition was also analyzed. Material and methods: a cross-sectional study was carried out with 130 older adults institutionalized in a nursing home. To study the validity of the GLIM criteria, sensitivity and specificity were calculated and a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated using the MNA questionnaire as the reference diagnostic method. A Lasso regression model was used to determine the order of importance of the criteria. Results: according to GLIM and MNA the prevalence of malnutrition was 26.2 % and 18.5 %, respectively. The GLIM criteria were found to have a sensitivity of 100 %, a specificity of 91 % and a very good level of precision (AUC = 0.95). The order of importance of the criteria from highest to lowest are loss of muscle mass, weight loss, presence of inflammation, low BMI and decreased nutrient intake or assimilation. Conclusions: the GLIM criteria presented a satisfactory level of validity and are therefore an acceptable method to diagnose malnutrition in institutionalized older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":19385,"journal":{"name":"Nutricion hospitalaria","volume":" ","pages":"1188-1193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutricion hospitalaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.05283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Introduction: the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) was created to unify the diagnosis of malnutrition worldwide. The main objective of this work is to evaluate the validity of the GLIM criteria for diagnosing malnutrition in a population over 65 years of age living in a nursing home. In addition, the order of importance of the GLIM criteria for diagnosing malnutrition was also analyzed. Material and methods: a cross-sectional study was carried out with 130 older adults institutionalized in a nursing home. To study the validity of the GLIM criteria, sensitivity and specificity were calculated and a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated using the MNA questionnaire as the reference diagnostic method. A Lasso regression model was used to determine the order of importance of the criteria. Results: according to GLIM and MNA the prevalence of malnutrition was 26.2 % and 18.5 %, respectively. The GLIM criteria were found to have a sensitivity of 100 %, a specificity of 91 % and a very good level of precision (AUC = 0.95). The order of importance of the criteria from highest to lowest are loss of muscle mass, weight loss, presence of inflammation, low BMI and decreased nutrient intake or assimilation. Conclusions: the GLIM criteria presented a satisfactory level of validity and are therefore an acceptable method to diagnose malnutrition in institutionalized older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[用于诊断养老院老年人营养不良的 GLIM 标准]。
导言:全球营养不良领导力倡议(GLIM)旨在统一全球营养不良的诊断标准。这项工作的主要目的是评估 GLIM 标准在诊断居住在疗养院的 65 岁以上老人营养不良方面的有效性。此外,还分析了诊断营养不良的 GLIM 标准的重要性顺序。材料和方法:对养老院中的 130 名老年人进行了横断面研究。为研究 GLIM 标准的有效性,计算了灵敏度和特异性,并以 MNA 问卷作为参考诊断方法,计算了接收者操作特征曲线 (ROC)。结果:根据 GLIM 和 MNA,营养不良的发生率分别为 26.2% 和 18.5%。GLIM 标准的灵敏度为 100%,特异度为 91%,精确度非常高(AUC = 0.95)。这些标准的重要性从高到低依次为:肌肉量减少、体重减轻、存在炎症、体重指数低和营养摄入或同化减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutricion hospitalaria
Nutricion hospitalaria 医学-营养学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Nutrición Hospitalaria was born following the SENPE Bulletin (1981-1983) and the SENPE journal (1984-1985). It is the official organ of expression of the Spanish Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Throughout its 36 years of existence has been adapting to the rhythms and demands set by the scientific community and the trends of the editorial processes, being its most recent milestone the achievement of Impact Factor (JCR) in 2009. Its content covers the fields of the sciences of nutrition, with special emphasis on nutritional support.
期刊最新文献
[Metabolic, clinical and body composition changes in Mexican adults undergoing bariatric surgery]. [Radiological versus endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis]. Decision tree model development and in silico validation for avoidable hospital readmissions at 30 days in a pediatric population. Heuristic evaluation of body mass index with bioimpedance data in the Mexican population. Weight-adjusted waist index predicts metabolic syndrome in Caucasian patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1