Survival outcomes of lymph node dissection in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: identifying suitable candidates.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY World Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03571-7
Huan Wang, Shuanghui Wang, Pengyu Wang, Yimin Han
{"title":"Survival outcomes of lymph node dissection in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: identifying suitable candidates.","authors":"Huan Wang, Shuanghui Wang, Pengyu Wang, Yimin Han","doi":"10.1186/s12957-024-03571-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to assess the effect of lymph node dissection on survival outcomes in patients presenting with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer and to delineate patient characteristics that may indicate a greater benefit from pelvic lymph node dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on individuals diagnosed with clinical stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer who received primary cytoreductive surgery at the Cancer Hospital Affiliated with Harbin Medical University from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2018. The investigation encompassed an examination of demographic data, clinicopathological profiles, perioperative complications, and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 315 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer were incorporated into the study and were segregated into two distinct cohorts: 217 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy (Group A) and 98 patients who did not undergo the procedure (Group B). The disparities in progression-free survival and overall survival between the two cohorts did not attain statistical significance (p > 0.05). Upon conducting a subgroup analysis, it was discerned that patients characterized by clear cell carcinoma as the pathological subtype demonstrated a significantly extended progression-free survival post-lymphadenectomy (p = 0.02). Additionally, the operative duration for the patients in Group A was significantly protracted in comparison to Group B (146.15 ± 39.132 min vs. 133.49 ± 35.308 min, P = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, lymph node dissection does not significantly improve progression-free or overall survival rates. Our findings suggest that individuals with clear cell carcinoma pathology have a higher probability of benefiting in terms of survival following lymph node dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03571-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to assess the effect of lymph node dissection on survival outcomes in patients presenting with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer and to delineate patient characteristics that may indicate a greater benefit from pelvic lymph node dissection.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on individuals diagnosed with clinical stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer who received primary cytoreductive surgery at the Cancer Hospital Affiliated with Harbin Medical University from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2018. The investigation encompassed an examination of demographic data, clinicopathological profiles, perioperative complications, and survival outcomes.

Results: A total of 315 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer were incorporated into the study and were segregated into two distinct cohorts: 217 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy (Group A) and 98 patients who did not undergo the procedure (Group B). The disparities in progression-free survival and overall survival between the two cohorts did not attain statistical significance (p > 0.05). Upon conducting a subgroup analysis, it was discerned that patients characterized by clear cell carcinoma as the pathological subtype demonstrated a significantly extended progression-free survival post-lymphadenectomy (p = 0.02). Additionally, the operative duration for the patients in Group A was significantly protracted in comparison to Group B (146.15 ± 39.132 min vs. 133.49 ± 35.308 min, P = 0.043).

Conclusion: For patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, lymph node dissection does not significantly improve progression-free or overall survival rates. Our findings suggest that individuals with clear cell carcinoma pathology have a higher probability of benefiting in terms of survival following lymph node dissection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期上皮性卵巢癌淋巴结清扫术的生存效果:确定合适的人选。
研究目的该研究旨在评估淋巴结清扫术对早期上皮性卵巢癌患者生存预后的影响,并明确盆腔淋巴结清扫术可使患者获益更多的患者特征:我们对2010年1月1日至2018年1月1日期间在哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院接受初次细胞减灭术的临床I-II期上皮性卵巢癌患者进行了回顾性分析。调查内容包括人口统计学数据、临床病理学特征、围手术期并发症和生存结果:共有 315 名确诊为卵巢癌的患者被纳入研究,并被分为两个不同的队列:217名患者接受了淋巴腺切除术(A组),98名患者未接受该手术(B组)。两组患者的无进展生存期和总生存期差异未达到统计学意义(P > 0.05)。进行亚组分析后发现,病理亚型为透明细胞癌的患者在淋巴腺切除术后的无进展生存期明显延长(P = 0.02)。此外,与 B 组相比,A 组患者的手术时间明显延长(146.15±39.132 分钟 vs. 133.49±35.308 分钟,P = 0.043):结论:对于早期卵巢癌患者,淋巴结清扫术并不能显著提高无进展生存率或总生存率。我们的研究结果表明,病理为透明细胞癌的患者在淋巴结清扫术后获益的概率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
期刊最新文献
Clinicopathological analysis of sclerosing haemangiomatoid nodular transformation of the spleen: analysis of three cases and a literature review. Efficacy and safety of IDH inhibitors in IDH-mutated cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials. Survival outcomes of lymph node dissection in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: identifying suitable candidates. The clinical efficacy of monolayer suture combined with hem-o-lok clip in partial nephrectomy among patient with renal cell carcinoma: a quasi-experimental study. Timing effects of short-term smoking cessation on lung cancer postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1