Meta-analysis of the factor structure of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS)
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the factor structure of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS)","authors":"Federico Dazzi , Alan Shafer","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The SAPS and SANS was designed to measure two broad factors, but the majority of factor analyses conducted have found substantially more dimensions. To investigate their structure a meta-analysis was conducted of SAPS and SANS factor analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A total of 42 articles reporting 55 factor analyses were retrieved from database searches (PubMed, PsychINFO) supplemented by searches of references. Reproduced correlations were calculated from retrieved factor analyses and 3 separate meta-analyses were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meta-analysis of the SAPS SANS global ratings (k = 34; <em>n</em> = 5219) yielded a 3-factor solution including Positive Symptoms (Hallucinations and Delusions), Negative Symptoms (Affective Flattening, Alogia, Avolition/Apathy, Anhedonia/Asociality and Attentional Impairment), and Disorganization (Positive Formal Thought Disorder and Bizarre Behavior). The item analysis of the SAPS SANS combined (k = 11; <em>n</em> = 3146) found 4 factors, with the Negative Symptoms splitting into Affective Flattening/Alogia and Avolition/Asociality as main difference. The SANS only item analysis (k = 10; <em>n</em> = 2073) identified 3 factors, Affective Flattening, Avolition/Asociality, and Alogia/Inattentiveness. Importantly, our data suggests that the items Inappropriate Affect and Poverty of Content of Speech should be moved from Negative Symptoms to the Disorganization factor. Attentional Impairment shows the highest loading on Negative Symptoms but its inclusion under this dimension is conceptually unclear and it may be better considered as a non-specific domain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The three factor structure of Positive Symptoms, Negative Symptoms and Disorganization accounted for most of the data. The SAPS SANS global scales are generally valid, but suggestions for a conservative revision of SAPS SANS structure, including supplementary subscales, are presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"274 ","pages":"Pages 464-472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996424004705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The SAPS and SANS was designed to measure two broad factors, but the majority of factor analyses conducted have found substantially more dimensions. To investigate their structure a meta-analysis was conducted of SAPS and SANS factor analysis.
Method
A total of 42 articles reporting 55 factor analyses were retrieved from database searches (PubMed, PsychINFO) supplemented by searches of references. Reproduced correlations were calculated from retrieved factor analyses and 3 separate meta-analyses were conducted.
Results
The meta-analysis of the SAPS SANS global ratings (k = 34; n = 5219) yielded a 3-factor solution including Positive Symptoms (Hallucinations and Delusions), Negative Symptoms (Affective Flattening, Alogia, Avolition/Apathy, Anhedonia/Asociality and Attentional Impairment), and Disorganization (Positive Formal Thought Disorder and Bizarre Behavior). The item analysis of the SAPS SANS combined (k = 11; n = 3146) found 4 factors, with the Negative Symptoms splitting into Affective Flattening/Alogia and Avolition/Asociality as main difference. The SANS only item analysis (k = 10; n = 2073) identified 3 factors, Affective Flattening, Avolition/Asociality, and Alogia/Inattentiveness. Importantly, our data suggests that the items Inappropriate Affect and Poverty of Content of Speech should be moved from Negative Symptoms to the Disorganization factor. Attentional Impairment shows the highest loading on Negative Symptoms but its inclusion under this dimension is conceptually unclear and it may be better considered as a non-specific domain.
Conclusions
The three factor structure of Positive Symptoms, Negative Symptoms and Disorganization accounted for most of the data. The SAPS SANS global scales are generally valid, but suggestions for a conservative revision of SAPS SANS structure, including supplementary subscales, are presented.
期刊介绍:
As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership!
Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue.
The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.