Meta-analysis of the factor structure of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS)

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.027
Federico Dazzi , Alan Shafer
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the factor structure of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS)","authors":"Federico Dazzi ,&nbsp;Alan Shafer","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The SAPS and SANS was designed to measure two broad factors, but the majority of factor analyses conducted have found substantially more dimensions. To investigate their structure a meta-analysis was conducted of SAPS and SANS factor analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A total of 42 articles reporting 55 factor analyses were retrieved from database searches (PubMed, PsychINFO) supplemented by searches of references. Reproduced correlations were calculated from retrieved factor analyses and 3 separate meta-analyses were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meta-analysis of the SAPS SANS global ratings (k = 34; <em>n</em> = 5219) yielded a 3-factor solution including Positive Symptoms (Hallucinations and Delusions), Negative Symptoms (Affective Flattening, Alogia, Avolition/Apathy, Anhedonia/Asociality and Attentional Impairment), and Disorganization (Positive Formal Thought Disorder and Bizarre Behavior). The item analysis of the SAPS SANS combined (k = 11; <em>n</em> = 3146) found 4 factors, with the Negative Symptoms splitting into Affective Flattening/Alogia and Avolition/Asociality as main difference. The SANS only item analysis (k = 10; <em>n</em> = 2073) identified 3 factors, Affective Flattening, Avolition/Asociality, and Alogia/Inattentiveness. Importantly, our data suggests that the items Inappropriate Affect and Poverty of Content of Speech should be moved from Negative Symptoms to the Disorganization factor. Attentional Impairment shows the highest loading on Negative Symptoms but its inclusion under this dimension is conceptually unclear and it may be better considered as a non-specific domain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The three factor structure of Positive Symptoms, Negative Symptoms and Disorganization accounted for most of the data. The SAPS SANS global scales are generally valid, but suggestions for a conservative revision of SAPS SANS structure, including supplementary subscales, are presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"274 ","pages":"Pages 464-472"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996424004705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The SAPS and SANS was designed to measure two broad factors, but the majority of factor analyses conducted have found substantially more dimensions. To investigate their structure a meta-analysis was conducted of SAPS and SANS factor analysis.

Method

A total of 42 articles reporting 55 factor analyses were retrieved from database searches (PubMed, PsychINFO) supplemented by searches of references. Reproduced correlations were calculated from retrieved factor analyses and 3 separate meta-analyses were conducted.

Results

The meta-analysis of the SAPS SANS global ratings (k = 34; n = 5219) yielded a 3-factor solution including Positive Symptoms (Hallucinations and Delusions), Negative Symptoms (Affective Flattening, Alogia, Avolition/Apathy, Anhedonia/Asociality and Attentional Impairment), and Disorganization (Positive Formal Thought Disorder and Bizarre Behavior). The item analysis of the SAPS SANS combined (k = 11; n = 3146) found 4 factors, with the Negative Symptoms splitting into Affective Flattening/Alogia and Avolition/Asociality as main difference. The SANS only item analysis (k = 10; n = 2073) identified 3 factors, Affective Flattening, Avolition/Asociality, and Alogia/Inattentiveness. Importantly, our data suggests that the items Inappropriate Affect and Poverty of Content of Speech should be moved from Negative Symptoms to the Disorganization factor. Attentional Impairment shows the highest loading on Negative Symptoms but its inclusion under this dimension is conceptually unclear and it may be better considered as a non-specific domain.

Conclusions

The three factor structure of Positive Symptoms, Negative Symptoms and Disorganization accounted for most of the data. The SAPS SANS global scales are generally valid, but suggestions for a conservative revision of SAPS SANS structure, including supplementary subscales, are presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消极症状评估量表(SANS)和积极症状评估量表(SAPS)因子结构的元分析。
介绍:SAPS 和 SANS 的设计目的是测量两个广泛的因子,但所进行的大多数因子分析都发现了更多的维度。为了研究它们的结构,我们对 SAPS 和 SANS 因子分析进行了元分析:方法:通过数据库搜索(PubMed、PsychINFO)和参考文献搜索,共检索到 42 篇报道 55 项因子分析的文章。从检索到的因子分析中计算出再现相关性,并分别进行了 3 次元分析:对 SAPS SANS 整体评分的荟萃分析(k = 34;n = 5219)得出了一个 3 因子解决方案,包括阳性症状(幻觉和妄想)、阴性症状(情感平淡、嗜睡、逃避/情感淡漠、失乐症/社交障碍和注意力障碍)和组织混乱(阳性形式思维障碍和怪异行为)。SAPS SANS 合并项目分析(k=11;n=3146)发现了 4 个因子,其中消极症状分为情感平淡/自闭和逃避/社交,这是主要差异。仅对 SANS 进行的项目分析(k = 10;n = 2073)发现了 3 个因子,即情感扁平化、逃避/社交性和焦虑/注意力不集中。重要的是,我们的数据表明,"不恰当情感 "和 "言语内容贫乏 "这两个项目应从 "消极症状 "移至 "组织混乱 "因子。注意力障碍在消极症状中的负荷最高,但将其纳入这一维度在概念上并不清晰,最好将其视为一个非特异性领域:积极症状、消极症状和组织混乱的三因子结构涵盖了大部分数据。SAPS SANS总体量表总体有效,但建议对SAPS SANS结构进行保守修订,包括补充子量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Schizophrenia Research
Schizophrenia Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership! Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue. The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing the relationship between personality dimensions and psychosis-specific clinical characteristics. Emotional intelligence as a predictor of functional outcomes in psychotic disorders. Ambient coarse particulate matter pollution and hospital admissions for schizophrenia. Positive mental health interventions for people with schizophrenia: A scoping review. Systematic review and meta-analysis of family-based interventions for early psychosis: Carer and patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1