Navigating the employment terrain in the Irish radiography sector.

Alison Considine, Mark F McEntee, Marie Ryan, Rena Young, Angela Flynn, Mohammad Rawashdeh, Mostafa Abdelrahman, Mohamed Z El-Sayed, Andrew England
{"title":"Navigating the employment terrain in the Irish radiography sector.","authors":"Alison Considine, Mark F McEntee, Marie Ryan, Rena Young, Angela Flynn, Mohammad Rawashdeh, Mostafa Abdelrahman, Mohamed Z El-Sayed, Andrew England","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Ireland, radiographers typically work in the public or private sector. This study investigates the determinants influencing radiographers' employment choices between the public and private sectors, offering employers valuable insights into the key factors that shape these decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was distributed nationally via social media and email. The survey gathered data on demographics, job acceptance factors, career progression, employee retention, and perceived sector advantages. Descriptive and qualitative analyses were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty-one radiographers completed the survey, representing approximately 4.7 % of state-registered (CORU) radiographers in Ireland. Key differences between sectors emerged: public sector radiographers prioritized pension, job security, and paid sick leave. Private sector radiographers valued salary, benefits, working hour flexibility, and specialized training opportunities. Career progression was viewed more favorably in the private sector (58 %) compared to the public sector (41 %). Both sectors reported similar retention issues, primarily due to heavy workloads and burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Employers can improve radiographer retention by aligning their strategies with the motivations of these professionals. The appeal of the public sector is rooted in stability and comprehensive benefits, whereas the private sector attracts radiographers through flexibility, opportunities for professional development, and higher income potential. By effectively balancing compensation, resources, and incentives, in conjunction with promoting technological innovation, organizations can significantly enhance radiographer retention in Ireland.</p>","PeriodicalId":94092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Ireland, radiographers typically work in the public or private sector. This study investigates the determinants influencing radiographers' employment choices between the public and private sectors, offering employers valuable insights into the key factors that shape these decisions.

Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed nationally via social media and email. The survey gathered data on demographics, job acceptance factors, career progression, employee retention, and perceived sector advantages. Descriptive and qualitative analyses were employed.

Results: One hundred and forty-one radiographers completed the survey, representing approximately 4.7 % of state-registered (CORU) radiographers in Ireland. Key differences between sectors emerged: public sector radiographers prioritized pension, job security, and paid sick leave. Private sector radiographers valued salary, benefits, working hour flexibility, and specialized training opportunities. Career progression was viewed more favorably in the private sector (58 %) compared to the public sector (41 %). Both sectors reported similar retention issues, primarily due to heavy workloads and burnout.

Conclusion: Employers can improve radiographer retention by aligning their strategies with the motivations of these professionals. The appeal of the public sector is rooted in stability and comprehensive benefits, whereas the private sector attracts radiographers through flexibility, opportunities for professional development, and higher income potential. By effectively balancing compensation, resources, and incentives, in conjunction with promoting technological innovation, organizations can significantly enhance radiographer retention in Ireland.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驾驭爱尔兰放射摄影行业的就业环境。
背景:在爱尔兰,放射技师通常在公共部门或私营部门工作。本研究调查了影响放射技师在公共部门和私营部门之间就业选择的决定性因素,为雇主提供了关于影响这些决定的关键因素的宝贵见解:通过社交媒体和电子邮件在全国范围内分发了一份在线问卷。调查收集了有关人口统计学、工作接受因素、职业发展、员工留用和感知部门优势等方面的数据。调查采用了描述性分析和定性分析:141名放射技师完成了调查,约占爱尔兰国家注册(CORU)放射技师的4.7%。不同行业之间存在主要差异:公共部门的放射技师优先考虑养老金、工作保障和带薪病假。私营部门的放射技师则看重薪酬、福利、工作时间的灵活性和专业培训机会。与公共部门(41%)相比,私营部门(58%)更看重职业发展。两个行业都报告了类似的留用问题,主要是由于繁重的工作量和职业倦怠:结论:雇主可以根据放射技师的动机调整战略,从而提高他们的留用率。公共部门的吸引力在于稳定和全面的福利,而私营部门则通过灵活性、职业发展机会和更高的收入潜力来吸引放射技师。通过有效平衡薪酬、资源和激励机制,同时促进技术创新,各组织可以显著提高爱尔兰放射技师的留用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Silent stories: A CT technologist's view. Navigating the employment terrain in the Irish radiography sector. Medical Image sharing: What do the public see when reviewing radiographs? A pilot study. Feasibility of low contrast volume and low injection flow rate in CT pulmonary angiography. Caffeine effect on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1