Stakeholder-centric explanations for black-box decisions: an XAI process model and its application to automotive goodwill assessments.

IF 3 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2024.1471208
Stefan Haas, Konstantin Hegestweiler, Michael Rapp, Maximilian Muschalik, Eyke Hüllermeier
{"title":"Stakeholder-centric explanations for black-box decisions: an XAI process model and its application to automotive goodwill assessments.","authors":"Stefan Haas, Konstantin Hegestweiler, Michael Rapp, Maximilian Muschalik, Eyke Hüllermeier","doi":"10.3389/frai.2024.1471208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Machine learning has made tremendous progress in predictive performance in recent years. Despite these advances, employing machine learning models in high-stake domains remains challenging due to the opaqueness of many high-performance models. If their behavior cannot be analyzed, this likely decreases the trust in such models and hinders the acceptance of human decision-makers. Motivated by these challenges, we propose a process model for developing and evaluating explainable decision support systems that are tailored to the needs of different stakeholders. To demonstrate its usefulness, we apply the process model to a real-world application in an enterprise context. The goal is to increase the acceptance of an existing black-box model developed at a car manufacturer for supporting manual goodwill assessments. Following the proposed process, we conduct two quantitative surveys targeted at the application's stakeholders. Our study reveals that textual explanations based on local feature importance best fit the needs of the stakeholders in the considered use case. Specifically, our results show that all stakeholders, including business specialists, goodwill assessors, and technical IT experts, agree that such explanations significantly increase their trust in the decision support system. Furthermore, our technical evaluation confirms the faithfulness and stability of the selected explanation method. These practical findings demonstrate the potential of our process model to facilitate the successful deployment of machine learning models in enterprise settings. The results emphasize the importance of developing explanations that are tailored to the specific needs and expectations of diverse stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 ","pages":"1471208"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1471208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning has made tremendous progress in predictive performance in recent years. Despite these advances, employing machine learning models in high-stake domains remains challenging due to the opaqueness of many high-performance models. If their behavior cannot be analyzed, this likely decreases the trust in such models and hinders the acceptance of human decision-makers. Motivated by these challenges, we propose a process model for developing and evaluating explainable decision support systems that are tailored to the needs of different stakeholders. To demonstrate its usefulness, we apply the process model to a real-world application in an enterprise context. The goal is to increase the acceptance of an existing black-box model developed at a car manufacturer for supporting manual goodwill assessments. Following the proposed process, we conduct two quantitative surveys targeted at the application's stakeholders. Our study reveals that textual explanations based on local feature importance best fit the needs of the stakeholders in the considered use case. Specifically, our results show that all stakeholders, including business specialists, goodwill assessors, and technical IT experts, agree that such explanations significantly increase their trust in the decision support system. Furthermore, our technical evaluation confirms the faithfulness and stability of the selected explanation method. These practical findings demonstrate the potential of our process model to facilitate the successful deployment of machine learning models in enterprise settings. The results emphasize the importance of developing explanations that are tailored to the specific needs and expectations of diverse stakeholders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以利益相关者为中心的黑箱决策解释:XAI 流程模型及其在汽车商誉评估中的应用。
近年来,机器学习在预测性能方面取得了巨大进步。尽管取得了这些进步,但由于许多高性能模型的不透明性,在高风险领域使用机器学习模型仍具有挑战性。如果无法对其行为进行分析,很可能会降低对此类模型的信任度,并阻碍人类决策者对其的接受。在这些挑战的激励下,我们提出了一个流程模型,用于开发和评估可解释的决策支持系统,以满足不同利益相关者的需求。为了证明其实用性,我们将该流程模型应用于企业环境中的实际应用。我们的目标是提高一家汽车制造商为支持人工商誉评估而开发的现有黑盒模型的接受度。按照建议的流程,我们针对应用程序的利益相关者进行了两次定量调查。我们的研究表明,在所考虑的用例中,基于局部特征重要性的文字说明最符合利益相关者的需求。具体来说,我们的研究结果表明,所有利益相关者,包括业务专家、商誉评估员和 IT 技术专家,都认为这种解释能显著提高他们对决策支持系统的信任度。此外,我们的技术评估证实了所选解释方法的忠实性和稳定性。这些实际研究结果表明,我们的流程模型具有促进机器学习模型在企业环境中成功部署的潜力。结果强调了根据不同利益相关者的具体需求和期望制定解释的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advancing smart city factories: enhancing industrial mechanical operations via deep learning techniques. Inpainting of damaged temple murals using edge- and line-guided diffusion patch GAN. Catalyzing IVF outcome prediction: exploring advanced machine learning paradigms for enhanced success rate prognostication. Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor. A generative AI-driven interactive listening assessment task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1